Capturing and Selecting Senescence Variation in Wheat
Senescence is a highly quantitative trait, but in wheat the genetics underpinning senescence regulation remain relatively unknown. To select senescence variation and ultimately identify novel genetic regulators, accurate characterization of senescence phenotypes is essential. When investigating sene...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.638738/full |
id |
doaj-17f9aa0cc19445ff816682eef06044b5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-17f9aa0cc19445ff816682eef06044b52021-04-16T05:43:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2021-04-011210.3389/fpls.2021.638738638738Capturing and Selecting Senescence Variation in WheatElizabeth A. Chapman0Simon Orford1Jacob Lage2Simon Griffiths3Department of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United KingdomDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United KingdomKWS UK Ltd., Thriplow, United KingdomDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United KingdomSenescence is a highly quantitative trait, but in wheat the genetics underpinning senescence regulation remain relatively unknown. To select senescence variation and ultimately identify novel genetic regulators, accurate characterization of senescence phenotypes is essential. When investigating senescence, phenotyping efforts often focus on, or are limited to, the visual assessment of flag leaves. However, senescence is a whole-plant process, involving remobilization and translocation of resources into the developing grain. Furthermore, the temporal progression of senescence poses challenges regarding trait quantification and description, whereupon the different models and approaches applied result in varying definitions of apparently similar metrics. To gain a holistic understanding of senescence, we phenotyped flag leaf and peduncle senescence progression, alongside grain maturation. Reviewing the literature, we identified techniques commonly applied in quantification of senescence variation and developed simple methods to calculate descriptive and discriminatory metrics. To capture senescence dynamism, we developed the idea of calculating thermal time to different flag leaf senescence scores, for which between-year Spearman’s rank correlations of r ≥ 0.59, P < 4.7 × 10–5 (TT70), identify as an accurate phenotyping method. Following our experience of senescence trait genetic mapping, we recognized the need for singular metrics capable of discriminating senescence variation, identifying thermal time to flag leaf senescence score of 70 (TT70) and mean peduncle senescence (MeanPed) scores as most informative. Moreover, grain maturity assessments confirmed a previous association between our staygreen traits and grain fill extension, illustrating trait functionality. Here we review different senescence phenotyping approaches and share our experiences of phenotyping two independent recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations segregating for staygreen traits. Together, we direct readers toward senescence phenotyping methods we found most effective, encouraging their use when investigating and discriminating senescence variation of differing genetic bases, and aid trait selection and weighting in breeding and research programs alike.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.638738/fullsenescencephenotypingselectionstaygreengrain developmentpeduncle |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elizabeth A. Chapman Simon Orford Jacob Lage Simon Griffiths |
spellingShingle |
Elizabeth A. Chapman Simon Orford Jacob Lage Simon Griffiths Capturing and Selecting Senescence Variation in Wheat Frontiers in Plant Science senescence phenotyping selection staygreen grain development peduncle |
author_facet |
Elizabeth A. Chapman Simon Orford Jacob Lage Simon Griffiths |
author_sort |
Elizabeth A. Chapman |
title |
Capturing and Selecting Senescence Variation in Wheat |
title_short |
Capturing and Selecting Senescence Variation in Wheat |
title_full |
Capturing and Selecting Senescence Variation in Wheat |
title_fullStr |
Capturing and Selecting Senescence Variation in Wheat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capturing and Selecting Senescence Variation in Wheat |
title_sort |
capturing and selecting senescence variation in wheat |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
issn |
1664-462X |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Senescence is a highly quantitative trait, but in wheat the genetics underpinning senescence regulation remain relatively unknown. To select senescence variation and ultimately identify novel genetic regulators, accurate characterization of senescence phenotypes is essential. When investigating senescence, phenotyping efforts often focus on, or are limited to, the visual assessment of flag leaves. However, senescence is a whole-plant process, involving remobilization and translocation of resources into the developing grain. Furthermore, the temporal progression of senescence poses challenges regarding trait quantification and description, whereupon the different models and approaches applied result in varying definitions of apparently similar metrics. To gain a holistic understanding of senescence, we phenotyped flag leaf and peduncle senescence progression, alongside grain maturation. Reviewing the literature, we identified techniques commonly applied in quantification of senescence variation and developed simple methods to calculate descriptive and discriminatory metrics. To capture senescence dynamism, we developed the idea of calculating thermal time to different flag leaf senescence scores, for which between-year Spearman’s rank correlations of r ≥ 0.59, P < 4.7 × 10–5 (TT70), identify as an accurate phenotyping method. Following our experience of senescence trait genetic mapping, we recognized the need for singular metrics capable of discriminating senescence variation, identifying thermal time to flag leaf senescence score of 70 (TT70) and mean peduncle senescence (MeanPed) scores as most informative. Moreover, grain maturity assessments confirmed a previous association between our staygreen traits and grain fill extension, illustrating trait functionality. Here we review different senescence phenotyping approaches and share our experiences of phenotyping two independent recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations segregating for staygreen traits. Together, we direct readers toward senescence phenotyping methods we found most effective, encouraging their use when investigating and discriminating senescence variation of differing genetic bases, and aid trait selection and weighting in breeding and research programs alike. |
topic |
senescence phenotyping selection staygreen grain development peduncle |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.638738/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elizabethachapman capturingandselectingsenescencevariationinwheat AT simonorford capturingandselectingsenescencevariationinwheat AT jacoblage capturingandselectingsenescencevariationinwheat AT simongriffiths capturingandselectingsenescencevariationinwheat |
_version_ |
1721525427590135808 |