Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.

X inactivation--the transcriptional silencing of one X chromosome copy per female somatic cell--is universal among therian mammals, yet the choice of which X to silence exhibits considerable variation among species. X inactivation strategies can range from strict paternally inherited X inactivation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Connallon, Andrew G Clark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-04-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3630082?pdf=render
id doaj-17e69c60fcb84205990843f9ab56bb4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17e69c60fcb84205990843f9ab56bb4a2020-11-24T21:49:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042013-04-0194e100344010.1371/journal.pgen.1003440Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.Tim ConnallonAndrew G ClarkX inactivation--the transcriptional silencing of one X chromosome copy per female somatic cell--is universal among therian mammals, yet the choice of which X to silence exhibits considerable variation among species. X inactivation strategies can range from strict paternally inherited X inactivation (PXI), which renders females haploid for all maternally inherited alleles, to unbiased random X inactivation (RXI), which equalizes expression of maternally and paternally inherited alleles in each female tissue. However, the underlying evolutionary processes that might account for this observed diversity of X inactivation strategies remain unclear. We present a theoretical population genetic analysis of X inactivation evolution and specifically consider how conditions of dominance, linkage, recombination, and sex-differential selection each influence evolutionary trajectories of X inactivation. The results indicate that a single, critical interaction between allelic dominance and sex-differential selection can select for a broad and continuous range of X inactivation strategies, including unequal rates of inactivation between maternally and paternally inherited X chromosomes. RXI is favored over complete PXI as long as alleles deleterious to female fitness are sufficiently recessive, and the criteria for RXI evolution is considerably more restrictive when fitness variation is sexually antagonistic (i.e., alleles deleterious to females are beneficial to males) relative to variation that is deleterious to both sexes. Evolutionary transitions from PXI to RXI also generally increase mean relative female fitness at the expense of decreased male fitness. These results provide a theoretical framework for predicting and interpreting the evolution of chromosome-wide expression of X-linked genes and lead to several useful predictions that could motivate future studies of allele-specific gene expression variation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3630082?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tim Connallon
Andrew G Clark
spellingShingle Tim Connallon
Andrew G Clark
Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.
PLoS Genetics
author_facet Tim Connallon
Andrew G Clark
author_sort Tim Connallon
title Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.
title_short Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.
title_full Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.
title_fullStr Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.
title_full_unstemmed Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.
title_sort sex-differential selection and the evolution of x inactivation strategies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Genetics
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
publishDate 2013-04-01
description X inactivation--the transcriptional silencing of one X chromosome copy per female somatic cell--is universal among therian mammals, yet the choice of which X to silence exhibits considerable variation among species. X inactivation strategies can range from strict paternally inherited X inactivation (PXI), which renders females haploid for all maternally inherited alleles, to unbiased random X inactivation (RXI), which equalizes expression of maternally and paternally inherited alleles in each female tissue. However, the underlying evolutionary processes that might account for this observed diversity of X inactivation strategies remain unclear. We present a theoretical population genetic analysis of X inactivation evolution and specifically consider how conditions of dominance, linkage, recombination, and sex-differential selection each influence evolutionary trajectories of X inactivation. The results indicate that a single, critical interaction between allelic dominance and sex-differential selection can select for a broad and continuous range of X inactivation strategies, including unequal rates of inactivation between maternally and paternally inherited X chromosomes. RXI is favored over complete PXI as long as alleles deleterious to female fitness are sufficiently recessive, and the criteria for RXI evolution is considerably more restrictive when fitness variation is sexually antagonistic (i.e., alleles deleterious to females are beneficial to males) relative to variation that is deleterious to both sexes. Evolutionary transitions from PXI to RXI also generally increase mean relative female fitness at the expense of decreased male fitness. These results provide a theoretical framework for predicting and interpreting the evolution of chromosome-wide expression of X-linked genes and lead to several useful predictions that could motivate future studies of allele-specific gene expression variation.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3630082?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT timconnallon sexdifferentialselectionandtheevolutionofxinactivationstrategies
AT andrewgclark sexdifferentialselectionandtheevolutionofxinactivationstrategies
_version_ 1725886613141061632