Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
ABSTRACT Objective: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. Methods: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000100094&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-17e5ddcf566746e287b6a11d06a0d3ee |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-17e5ddcf566746e287b6a11d06a0d3ee2020-11-25T00:56:37ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-43785319410010.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008S0102-36162018000100094Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedgeCarlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Fonseca NetoMarcos Murilo Santana LimaBruno Tavares RabelloLeonardo da Silva SenaLuiz Carlos Zacaron JúniorMaurício Tarrago VianaABSTRACT Objective: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. Methods: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using trabecular metal wedges from September 2010 to December 2014 were evaluated. This study included only cases of Paprosky 3A and 3B. Preoperative and postoperative images were analyzed. Non-fixation of the implant was defined by the presence of angular variation of the component higher 10 degrees or displacement greater than 6 mm. Patients with follow-up times of less than 24 months or who did not attend the last two appointments were excluded from the study. Results: The mean follow-up time was 39.4 months (25-61). Fixation was achieved in all cases despite its complexity. There was only one case of dislocation that was treated with open reduction. One case developed infection, and was surgically approached on two occasions, with extensive debridement and intravenous antibiotics following protocol, with good evolution. Conclusion: The implanted trabecular metal wedges showed excellent results in the short- and medium-term and may represent another option in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects, sometimes replacing bone reconstruction that uses bone tissue banks or autologous graft.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000100094&lng=en&tlng=enArtroplastia de quadrilAcetábuloPróteses e implantes |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Fonseca Neto Marcos Murilo Santana Lima Bruno Tavares Rabello Leonardo da Silva Sena Luiz Carlos Zacaron Júnior Maurício Tarrago Viana |
spellingShingle |
Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Fonseca Neto Marcos Murilo Santana Lima Bruno Tavares Rabello Leonardo da Silva Sena Luiz Carlos Zacaron Júnior Maurício Tarrago Viana Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Artroplastia de quadril Acetábulo Próteses e implantes |
author_facet |
Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Fonseca Neto Marcos Murilo Santana Lima Bruno Tavares Rabello Leonardo da Silva Sena Luiz Carlos Zacaron Júnior Maurício Tarrago Viana |
author_sort |
Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Fonseca Neto |
title |
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_short |
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_full |
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_fullStr |
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_sort |
radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with paprosky 3a and 3b submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
series |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia |
issn |
1982-4378 |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. Methods: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using trabecular metal wedges from September 2010 to December 2014 were evaluated. This study included only cases of Paprosky 3A and 3B. Preoperative and postoperative images were analyzed. Non-fixation of the implant was defined by the presence of angular variation of the component higher 10 degrees or displacement greater than 6 mm. Patients with follow-up times of less than 24 months or who did not attend the last two appointments were excluded from the study. Results: The mean follow-up time was 39.4 months (25-61). Fixation was achieved in all cases despite its complexity. There was only one case of dislocation that was treated with open reduction. One case developed infection, and was surgically approached on two occasions, with extensive debridement and intravenous antibiotics following protocol, with good evolution. Conclusion: The implanted trabecular metal wedges showed excellent results in the short- and medium-term and may represent another option in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects, sometimes replacing bone reconstruction that uses bone tissue banks or autologous graft. |
topic |
Artroplastia de quadril Acetábulo Próteses e implantes |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000100094&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carloseduardobenvindorosaldafonsecaneto radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT marcosmurilosantanalima radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT brunotavaresrabello radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT leonardodasilvasena radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT luizcarloszacaronjunior radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT mauriciotarragoviana radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge |
_version_ |
1725226322998853632 |