Measuring organizational culture: An empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a Mongolian setting

While it has become common practice to measure organizational culture quantitatively, its applicability is seldom questioned nor investigated. This empirical study shows, how one of the most frequently used questionnaires (Hofstede et al. 1990), can only be partly replicated in a Mongolian setting u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ariunaa Kh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mongolian Academy of Sciences 2018-04-01
Series:Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mongoliajol.info/index.php/PMAS/article/view/979
id doaj-17d4e95c3ff74d43bdd75679e7163903
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17d4e95c3ff74d43bdd75679e71639032020-11-25T00:44:40ZengMongolian Academy of SciencesProceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences2310-47162312-29942018-04-0158114015910.5564/pmas.v58i1.979932Measuring organizational culture: An empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a Mongolian settingAriunaa Kh0Department of Business Administration, School of Business Administration and Humanities Mongolian University of Science and TechnologyWhile it has become common practice to measure organizational culture quantitatively, its applicability is seldom questioned nor investigated. This empirical study shows, how one of the most frequently used questionnaires (Hofstede et al. 1990), can only be partly replicated in a Mongolian setting using a translated version of the Hofstede et al. (1990) questionnaire. Quantitative data was collected and analyzed accordingly, using common statistical procedures, such as factor analysis and Cronbach alpha measures. The sample consists of 1106 Mongolian employees in three service sectors. The service sectors are mobile communications service, banking sector and education sector. This study shows that Hofstede et al.’s (1990) questionnaire can only partly be replicated in a Mongolian setting. Data was only collected and interpreted in a Mongolian context. We propose that future research should focus on matching dimensions approaches to organizational culture with other existing models, e.g. Schein (1985), Hatch & Cunliffe (2006), Dauber et al. (2010).https://www.mongoliajol.info/index.php/PMAS/article/view/979organizational cultureperformanceHofstede questionnaire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ariunaa Kh
spellingShingle Ariunaa Kh
Measuring organizational culture: An empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a Mongolian setting
Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences
organizational culture
performance
Hofstede questionnaire
author_facet Ariunaa Kh
author_sort Ariunaa Kh
title Measuring organizational culture: An empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a Mongolian setting
title_short Measuring organizational culture: An empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a Mongolian setting
title_full Measuring organizational culture: An empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a Mongolian setting
title_fullStr Measuring organizational culture: An empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a Mongolian setting
title_full_unstemmed Measuring organizational culture: An empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a Mongolian setting
title_sort measuring organizational culture: an empirical assessment of the hofstede questionnaire in a mongolian setting
publisher Mongolian Academy of Sciences
series Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences
issn 2310-4716
2312-2994
publishDate 2018-04-01
description While it has become common practice to measure organizational culture quantitatively, its applicability is seldom questioned nor investigated. This empirical study shows, how one of the most frequently used questionnaires (Hofstede et al. 1990), can only be partly replicated in a Mongolian setting using a translated version of the Hofstede et al. (1990) questionnaire. Quantitative data was collected and analyzed accordingly, using common statistical procedures, such as factor analysis and Cronbach alpha measures. The sample consists of 1106 Mongolian employees in three service sectors. The service sectors are mobile communications service, banking sector and education sector. This study shows that Hofstede et al.’s (1990) questionnaire can only partly be replicated in a Mongolian setting. Data was only collected and interpreted in a Mongolian context. We propose that future research should focus on matching dimensions approaches to organizational culture with other existing models, e.g. Schein (1985), Hatch & Cunliffe (2006), Dauber et al. (2010).
topic organizational culture
performance
Hofstede questionnaire
url https://www.mongoliajol.info/index.php/PMAS/article/view/979
work_keys_str_mv AT ariunaakh measuringorganizationalcultureanempiricalassessmentofthehofstedequestionnaireinamongoliansetting
_version_ 1725274207550439424