Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS), such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been used in stroke patients with motor impairment. NBS can help recovery from brain damage by modulating cortical excitability. However, the effica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jungsoo Lee, Ahee Lee, Heegoo Kim, Mina Shin, Sang Moon Yun, Youngjin Jung, Won Hyuk Chang, Yun-Hee Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3826495
id doaj-17d2f199d6eb49a1a2fe4395adee04eb
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jungsoo Lee
Ahee Lee
Heegoo Kim
Mina Shin
Sang Moon Yun
Youngjin Jung
Won Hyuk Chang
Yun-Hee Kim
spellingShingle Jungsoo Lee
Ahee Lee
Heegoo Kim
Mina Shin
Sang Moon Yun
Youngjin Jung
Won Hyuk Chang
Yun-Hee Kim
Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients
Neural Plasticity
author_facet Jungsoo Lee
Ahee Lee
Heegoo Kim
Mina Shin
Sang Moon Yun
Youngjin Jung
Won Hyuk Chang
Yun-Hee Kim
author_sort Jungsoo Lee
title Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients
title_short Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients
title_full Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients
title_fullStr Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients
title_sort different brain connectivity between responders and nonresponders to dual-mode noninvasive brain stimulation over bilateral primary motor cortices in stroke patients
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Neural Plasticity
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS), such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been used in stroke patients with motor impairment. NBS can help recovery from brain damage by modulating cortical excitability. However, the efficacy of NBS varies among individuals. To obtain insights of responsiveness to the efficacy of NBS, we investigated characteristic changes of the motor network in responders and nonresponders of NBS over the primary motor cortex (M1). A total of 21 patients with subacute stroke (13 males, mean age 59.6±11.5 years) received NBS in the same manner: 1 Hz rTMS on the contralesional M1 and anodal tDCS on the ipsilesional M1. Participants were classified into responders and nonresponders based on the functional improvement of the affected upper extremity after applying NBS. Twelve age-matched healthy controls (8 males, mean age 56.1±14.3 years) were also recruited. Motor networks were constructed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. M1 intrahemispheric connectivity, interhemispheric connectivity, and network efficiency were measured to investigate differences in network characteristics between groups. The motor network characteristics were found to differ between both groups. Specifically, M1 intrahemispheric connectivity in responders showed a noticeable imbalance between affected and unaffected hemispheres, which was markedly restored after NBS. The responders also showed greater interhemispheric connectivity and higher efficiency of the motor network than the nonresponders. These results may provide insight on patient-specific NBS treatment based on the brain network characteristics in neurorehabilitation of patients with stroke. This trial is registered with trial registration number NCT03390192.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3826495
work_keys_str_mv AT jungsoolee differentbrainconnectivitybetweenrespondersandnonresponderstodualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationoverbilateralprimarymotorcorticesinstrokepatients
AT aheelee differentbrainconnectivitybetweenrespondersandnonresponderstodualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationoverbilateralprimarymotorcorticesinstrokepatients
AT heegookim differentbrainconnectivitybetweenrespondersandnonresponderstodualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationoverbilateralprimarymotorcorticesinstrokepatients
AT minashin differentbrainconnectivitybetweenrespondersandnonresponderstodualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationoverbilateralprimarymotorcorticesinstrokepatients
AT sangmoonyun differentbrainconnectivitybetweenrespondersandnonresponderstodualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationoverbilateralprimarymotorcorticesinstrokepatients
AT youngjinjung differentbrainconnectivitybetweenrespondersandnonresponderstodualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationoverbilateralprimarymotorcorticesinstrokepatients
AT wonhyukchang differentbrainconnectivitybetweenrespondersandnonresponderstodualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationoverbilateralprimarymotorcorticesinstrokepatients
AT yunheekim differentbrainconnectivitybetweenrespondersandnonresponderstodualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationoverbilateralprimarymotorcorticesinstrokepatients
_version_ 1725872980435664896
spelling doaj-17d2f199d6eb49a1a2fe4395adee04eb2020-11-24T21:53:04ZengHindawi LimitedNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432019-01-01201910.1155/2019/38264953826495Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke PatientsJungsoo Lee0Ahee Lee1Heegoo Kim2Mina Shin3Sang Moon Yun4Youngjin Jung5Won Hyuk Chang6Yun-Hee Kim7Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Global Prestige Radiological Science, Dongseo University, 47 Jurye-ro, Sasang-gu, Busan 47011, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of KoreaNoninvasive brain stimulation (NBS), such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been used in stroke patients with motor impairment. NBS can help recovery from brain damage by modulating cortical excitability. However, the efficacy of NBS varies among individuals. To obtain insights of responsiveness to the efficacy of NBS, we investigated characteristic changes of the motor network in responders and nonresponders of NBS over the primary motor cortex (M1). A total of 21 patients with subacute stroke (13 males, mean age 59.6±11.5 years) received NBS in the same manner: 1 Hz rTMS on the contralesional M1 and anodal tDCS on the ipsilesional M1. Participants were classified into responders and nonresponders based on the functional improvement of the affected upper extremity after applying NBS. Twelve age-matched healthy controls (8 males, mean age 56.1±14.3 years) were also recruited. Motor networks were constructed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. M1 intrahemispheric connectivity, interhemispheric connectivity, and network efficiency were measured to investigate differences in network characteristics between groups. The motor network characteristics were found to differ between both groups. Specifically, M1 intrahemispheric connectivity in responders showed a noticeable imbalance between affected and unaffected hemispheres, which was markedly restored after NBS. The responders also showed greater interhemispheric connectivity and higher efficiency of the motor network than the nonresponders. These results may provide insight on patient-specific NBS treatment based on the brain network characteristics in neurorehabilitation of patients with stroke. This trial is registered with trial registration number NCT03390192.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3826495