Comparative fMRI and MEG localization of cortical sensorimotor function: Bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Preoperative functional mapping in the vicinity of brain lesion is of high importance for avoiding complications in surgical management. However, space-occupying lesions may lead to functional reorganization or decreased BOLD activity.<h4>Methods</h4>Ther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Max Zimmermann, Karl Rössler, Martin Kaltenhäuser, Peter Grummich, Nadja Brandner, Michael Buchfelder, Arnd Dörfler, Konrad Kölble, Andreas Stadlbauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213371
id doaj-17c35d9c90d846abba36e90fa10d0b06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17c35d9c90d846abba36e90fa10d0b062021-03-04T10:35:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01143e021337110.1371/journal.pone.0213371Comparative fMRI and MEG localization of cortical sensorimotor function: Bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.Max ZimmermannKarl RösslerMartin KaltenhäuserPeter GrummichNadja BrandnerMichael BuchfelderArnd DörflerKonrad KölbleAndreas Stadlbauer<h4>Introduction</h4>Preoperative functional mapping in the vicinity of brain lesion is of high importance for avoiding complications in surgical management. However, space-occupying lesions may lead to functional reorganization or decreased BOLD activity.<h4>Methods</h4>Therefore in 13 patients with cerebral gliomas or brain arterio-venous malformations/ hemangioma fMRI- and MEG-based cortical localizations of motor and somatosensory cortical activation pattern were compared in order to investigate their congruency.<h4>Results</h4>Localization of cortical sensorimotor areas with fMRI and MEG showed good congruency with a mean spatial distance of around 10 mm, with differences depending on the localization method. The smallest mean differences for the centroids were found for MEF with MNE 8 mm and SEF with sLORETA 8 mm. Primary motor area (M1) reorganization was found in 5 of 12 patients in fMRI and confirmed with MEG data. In these 5 patients with M1-reorganization the distance between the border of the fMRI-based cortical M1-localization and the tumor border on T1w MR images varied between 0-4 mm, which was significant (P = 0.025) different to the distance in glioma patients without M1-reorganization (5-26 mm).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our multimodal preoperative mapping approach combining fMRI and MEG reveals a high degree of spatial congruence and provided high evidence for the presence of motor cortex reorganization.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213371
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Max Zimmermann
Karl Rössler
Martin Kaltenhäuser
Peter Grummich
Nadja Brandner
Michael Buchfelder
Arnd Dörfler
Konrad Kölble
Andreas Stadlbauer
spellingShingle Max Zimmermann
Karl Rössler
Martin Kaltenhäuser
Peter Grummich
Nadja Brandner
Michael Buchfelder
Arnd Dörfler
Konrad Kölble
Andreas Stadlbauer
Comparative fMRI and MEG localization of cortical sensorimotor function: Bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Max Zimmermann
Karl Rössler
Martin Kaltenhäuser
Peter Grummich
Nadja Brandner
Michael Buchfelder
Arnd Dörfler
Konrad Kölble
Andreas Stadlbauer
author_sort Max Zimmermann
title Comparative fMRI and MEG localization of cortical sensorimotor function: Bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.
title_short Comparative fMRI and MEG localization of cortical sensorimotor function: Bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.
title_full Comparative fMRI and MEG localization of cortical sensorimotor function: Bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.
title_fullStr Comparative fMRI and MEG localization of cortical sensorimotor function: Bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative fMRI and MEG localization of cortical sensorimotor function: Bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.
title_sort comparative fmri and meg localization of cortical sensorimotor function: bimodal mapping supports motor area reorganization in glioma patients.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Preoperative functional mapping in the vicinity of brain lesion is of high importance for avoiding complications in surgical management. However, space-occupying lesions may lead to functional reorganization or decreased BOLD activity.<h4>Methods</h4>Therefore in 13 patients with cerebral gliomas or brain arterio-venous malformations/ hemangioma fMRI- and MEG-based cortical localizations of motor and somatosensory cortical activation pattern were compared in order to investigate their congruency.<h4>Results</h4>Localization of cortical sensorimotor areas with fMRI and MEG showed good congruency with a mean spatial distance of around 10 mm, with differences depending on the localization method. The smallest mean differences for the centroids were found for MEF with MNE 8 mm and SEF with sLORETA 8 mm. Primary motor area (M1) reorganization was found in 5 of 12 patients in fMRI and confirmed with MEG data. In these 5 patients with M1-reorganization the distance between the border of the fMRI-based cortical M1-localization and the tumor border on T1w MR images varied between 0-4 mm, which was significant (P = 0.025) different to the distance in glioma patients without M1-reorganization (5-26 mm).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our multimodal preoperative mapping approach combining fMRI and MEG reveals a high degree of spatial congruence and provided high evidence for the presence of motor cortex reorganization.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213371
work_keys_str_mv AT maxzimmermann comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
AT karlrossler comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
AT martinkaltenhauser comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
AT petergrummich comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
AT nadjabrandner comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
AT michaelbuchfelder comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
AT arnddorfler comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
AT konradkolble comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
AT andreasstadlbauer comparativefmriandmeglocalizationofcorticalsensorimotorfunctionbimodalmappingsupportsmotorareareorganizationingliomapatients
_version_ 1714805317286494208