Poor Folk by Fyodor Dostoevsky as a Dialogue between the Old and the New Word

Although Poor Folk, the first novel by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, has been thoroughly studied, the correlation between its characters’ epistolary styles is not yet clarified. Varvara Dobroselova’s language usually escapes critical attention, albeit her “verbal” function in the novel might even exceed her “...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Victoria I. Buyanovskaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2018-12-01
Series:Studia Litterarum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studlit.ru/images/2018-3-4/Buyanovskaya.pdf
id doaj-17ba6d8952884e53b1420f75aee98613
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17ba6d8952884e53b1420f75aee986132020-11-24T21:15:21ZengA.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesStudia Litterarum2500-42472541-85642018-12-013415216910.22455/2500-4247-2018-3-4-152-169Poor Folk by Fyodor Dostoevsky as a Dialogue between the Old and the New WordVictoria I. Buyanovskaya0National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, RussiaAlthough Poor Folk, the first novel by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, has been thoroughly studied, the correlation between its characters’ epistolary styles is not yet clarified. Varvara Dobroselova’s language usually escapes critical attention, albeit her “verbal” function in the novel might even exceed her “plot” function. Makar Alekseyevich’s style develops itself in the endless dialogue with “pattern” style and can be only understood in comparison. The article focuses on the major differences in the narrative strategies of the characters. It reveals the opposition of Varvara Alekseyevna’s “ready-made” word deeply enrooted in the sentimental tradition and Devushkin’s language which is intensely forming at the moment of writing and shifts constantly from one level of discourse to another. The topics selected by the characters, time orientation of their letters, and their style are closely analyzed in comparative perspective. The analysis reveals an important regularity: the expressiveness in Varvara Alekseyevna’s letters is attained through paralipsis, while Devushkin’s letters are expressive precisely as they speak even the most obscure and painful things. Devushkin’s language, as the article shows, tends to appropriate and combine diverse elements of the style of the other and to explore new thematic and stylistic spheres. As a result, the problems and techniques of the Natural School emerge in his letters. The study of Devushkin’s speech strategy with its effusive and even aggressive nature allows us to conclude that the character not only “unbosoms his feelings,” but also tries to assert himself in the new word, as it were, when arguing with Varvara Alekseyevna (read: old literature).http://studlit.ru/images/2018-3-4/Buyanovskaya.pdfF. M. Dostoevsky"Poor people"epistolary noveldialogic narrative
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Victoria I. Buyanovskaya
spellingShingle Victoria I. Buyanovskaya
Poor Folk by Fyodor Dostoevsky as a Dialogue between the Old and the New Word
Studia Litterarum
F. M. Dostoevsky
"Poor people"
epistolary novel
dialogic narrative
author_facet Victoria I. Buyanovskaya
author_sort Victoria I. Buyanovskaya
title Poor Folk by Fyodor Dostoevsky as a Dialogue between the Old and the New Word
title_short Poor Folk by Fyodor Dostoevsky as a Dialogue between the Old and the New Word
title_full Poor Folk by Fyodor Dostoevsky as a Dialogue between the Old and the New Word
title_fullStr Poor Folk by Fyodor Dostoevsky as a Dialogue between the Old and the New Word
title_full_unstemmed Poor Folk by Fyodor Dostoevsky as a Dialogue between the Old and the New Word
title_sort poor folk by fyodor dostoevsky as a dialogue between the old and the new word
publisher A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Studia Litterarum
issn 2500-4247
2541-8564
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Although Poor Folk, the first novel by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, has been thoroughly studied, the correlation between its characters’ epistolary styles is not yet clarified. Varvara Dobroselova’s language usually escapes critical attention, albeit her “verbal” function in the novel might even exceed her “plot” function. Makar Alekseyevich’s style develops itself in the endless dialogue with “pattern” style and can be only understood in comparison. The article focuses on the major differences in the narrative strategies of the characters. It reveals the opposition of Varvara Alekseyevna’s “ready-made” word deeply enrooted in the sentimental tradition and Devushkin’s language which is intensely forming at the moment of writing and shifts constantly from one level of discourse to another. The topics selected by the characters, time orientation of their letters, and their style are closely analyzed in comparative perspective. The analysis reveals an important regularity: the expressiveness in Varvara Alekseyevna’s letters is attained through paralipsis, while Devushkin’s letters are expressive precisely as they speak even the most obscure and painful things. Devushkin’s language, as the article shows, tends to appropriate and combine diverse elements of the style of the other and to explore new thematic and stylistic spheres. As a result, the problems and techniques of the Natural School emerge in his letters. The study of Devushkin’s speech strategy with its effusive and even aggressive nature allows us to conclude that the character not only “unbosoms his feelings,” but also tries to assert himself in the new word, as it were, when arguing with Varvara Alekseyevna (read: old literature).
topic F. M. Dostoevsky
"Poor people"
epistolary novel
dialogic narrative
url http://studlit.ru/images/2018-3-4/Buyanovskaya.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT victoriaibuyanovskaya poorfolkbyfyodordostoevskyasadialoguebetweentheoldandthenewword
_version_ 1716745645676560384