‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing

The concept of the ‘predatory’ publisher has today become a standard way of characterizing a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we tre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kirsten Bell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: tripleC 2017-07-01
Series:tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/870
id doaj-17aa8d29a3d94e20b32661d26b9a4b60
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17aa8d29a3d94e20b32661d26b9a4b602020-11-24T22:07:27ZengtripleCtripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique1726-670X1726-670X2017-07-0115265166210.31269/triplec.v15i2.870870‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic PublishingKirsten Bell0University of British ColumbiaThe concept of the ‘predatory’ publisher has today become a standard way of characterizing a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we treat them as parody instead of predator, a far more nuanced reading emerges. Viewed in this light, such journals destabilize the prevailing discourse on what constitutes a ‘legitimate’ journal, and, indeed, the nature of scholarly knowledge production itself. Instead of condemning them outright, their growth should therefore encourage us to ask difficult but necessary questions about the commercial context of knowledge production, prevailing conceptions of quality and value, and the ways in which they privilege scholarship from the ‘centre’ and exclude that from the ‘periphery’.https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/870open access publisherspredatory journalsacademic publishingparodymimicry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kirsten Bell
spellingShingle Kirsten Bell
‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing
tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
open access publishers
predatory journals
academic publishing
parody
mimicry
author_facet Kirsten Bell
author_sort Kirsten Bell
title ‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing
title_short ‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing
title_full ‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing
title_fullStr ‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing
title_full_unstemmed ‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing
title_sort ‘predatory’ open access journals as parody: exposing the limitations of ‘legitimate’ academic publishing
publisher tripleC
series tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
issn 1726-670X
1726-670X
publishDate 2017-07-01
description The concept of the ‘predatory’ publisher has today become a standard way of characterizing a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we treat them as parody instead of predator, a far more nuanced reading emerges. Viewed in this light, such journals destabilize the prevailing discourse on what constitutes a ‘legitimate’ journal, and, indeed, the nature of scholarly knowledge production itself. Instead of condemning them outright, their growth should therefore encourage us to ask difficult but necessary questions about the commercial context of knowledge production, prevailing conceptions of quality and value, and the ways in which they privilege scholarship from the ‘centre’ and exclude that from the ‘periphery’.
topic open access publishers
predatory journals
academic publishing
parody
mimicry
url https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/870
work_keys_str_mv AT kirstenbell predatoryopenaccessjournalsasparodyexposingthelimitationsoflegitimateacademicpublishing
_version_ 1725820312114692096