‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing
The concept of the ‘predatory’ publisher has today become a standard way of characterizing a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we tre...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
tripleC
2017-07-01
|
Series: | tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/870 |
id |
doaj-17aa8d29a3d94e20b32661d26b9a4b60 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-17aa8d29a3d94e20b32661d26b9a4b602020-11-24T22:07:27ZengtripleCtripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique1726-670X1726-670X2017-07-0115265166210.31269/triplec.v15i2.870870‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic PublishingKirsten Bell0University of British ColumbiaThe concept of the ‘predatory’ publisher has today become a standard way of characterizing a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we treat them as parody instead of predator, a far more nuanced reading emerges. Viewed in this light, such journals destabilize the prevailing discourse on what constitutes a ‘legitimate’ journal, and, indeed, the nature of scholarly knowledge production itself. Instead of condemning them outright, their growth should therefore encourage us to ask difficult but necessary questions about the commercial context of knowledge production, prevailing conceptions of quality and value, and the ways in which they privilege scholarship from the ‘centre’ and exclude that from the ‘periphery’.https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/870open access publisherspredatory journalsacademic publishingparodymimicry |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kirsten Bell |
spellingShingle |
Kirsten Bell ‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique open access publishers predatory journals academic publishing parody mimicry |
author_facet |
Kirsten Bell |
author_sort |
Kirsten Bell |
title |
‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing |
title_short |
‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing |
title_full |
‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing |
title_fullStr |
‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing |
title_sort |
‘predatory’ open access journals as parody: exposing the limitations of ‘legitimate’ academic publishing |
publisher |
tripleC |
series |
tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique |
issn |
1726-670X 1726-670X |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
The concept of the ‘predatory’ publisher has today become a standard way of characterizing a new breed of open access journals that seem to be more concerned with making a profit than disseminating academic knowledge. This essay presents an alternative view of such publishers, arguing that if we treat them as parody instead of predator, a far more nuanced reading emerges. Viewed in this light, such journals destabilize the prevailing discourse on what constitutes a ‘legitimate’ journal, and, indeed, the nature of scholarly knowledge production itself. Instead of condemning them outright, their growth should therefore encourage us to ask difficult but necessary questions about the commercial context of knowledge production, prevailing conceptions of quality and value, and the ways in which they privilege scholarship from the ‘centre’ and exclude that from the ‘periphery’. |
topic |
open access publishers predatory journals academic publishing parody mimicry |
url |
https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/870 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kirstenbell predatoryopenaccessjournalsasparodyexposingthelimitationsoflegitimateacademicpublishing |
_version_ |
1725820312114692096 |