The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms
The analysis of spatial relationship, or configuration, among the components of a character is important for visual word form recognition (Kao et al., 2010). We investigated such spatial configuration processing in dyslexics and developing populations. Four types of characters: real- and non-charact...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2011-05-01
|
Series: | i-Perception |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1068/ic261 |
id |
doaj-17a8b66c18c3454d8fe41cd163f3d2ae |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-17a8b66c18c3454d8fe41cd163f3d2ae2020-11-25T04:01:00ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952011-05-01210.1068/ic26110.1068_ic261The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word FormsChienhui Kao0Hsiaolan Wang1Chienchung Chen2Department of Psychology, National Taiwan UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Cambridge UniversityDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan UniversityThe analysis of spatial relationship, or configuration, among the components of a character is important for visual word form recognition (Kao et al., 2010). We investigated such spatial configuration processing in dyslexics and developing populations. Four types of characters: real- and non-characters and their upside-down versions were used in this study. The task of the observers was to determine whether two characters presented on the display were identical. One group of dyslexic children (Dys) and two groups of non-dyslexic controls, one (RL) matched Dys in reading performance and the other (CA) matched in age, were recruited in this study. Dys performed significantly worse than the control groups for all character types, suggesting a worse visual word form processing in dyslexics. For Dys and CA, the proportional correct response for the upright real characters was better than that for their upside-down versions. RL, (which was younger) showed the same effect for the non-characters. Since the non-characters disrupts the global configuration while the inverted characters disrupted both local and global configurations, our results suggest that younger children recognize a word with an analysis of the local configuration while older children, regardless of whether they are dyslexics or not, analyze the global configuration.https://doi.org/10.1068/ic261 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chienhui Kao Hsiaolan Wang Chienchung Chen |
spellingShingle |
Chienhui Kao Hsiaolan Wang Chienchung Chen The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms i-Perception |
author_facet |
Chienhui Kao Hsiaolan Wang Chienchung Chen |
author_sort |
Chienhui Kao |
title |
The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms |
title_short |
The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms |
title_full |
The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms |
title_fullStr |
The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms |
title_sort |
development of spatial configuration processing of visual word forms |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
i-Perception |
issn |
2041-6695 |
publishDate |
2011-05-01 |
description |
The analysis of spatial relationship, or configuration, among the components of a character is important for visual word form recognition (Kao et al., 2010). We investigated such spatial configuration processing in dyslexics and developing populations. Four types of characters: real- and non-characters and their upside-down versions were used in this study. The task of the observers was to determine whether two characters presented on the display were identical. One group of dyslexic children (Dys) and two groups of non-dyslexic controls, one (RL) matched Dys in reading performance and the other (CA) matched in age, were recruited in this study. Dys performed significantly worse than the control groups for all character types, suggesting a worse visual word form processing in dyslexics. For Dys and CA, the proportional correct response for the upright real characters was better than that for their upside-down versions. RL, (which was younger) showed the same effect for the non-characters. Since the non-characters disrupts the global configuration while the inverted characters disrupted both local and global configurations, our results suggest that younger children recognize a word with an analysis of the local configuration while older children, regardless of whether they are dyslexics or not, analyze the global configuration. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1068/ic261 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chienhuikao thedevelopmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms AT hsiaolanwang thedevelopmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms AT chienchungchen thedevelopmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms AT chienhuikao developmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms AT hsiaolanwang developmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms AT chienchungchen developmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms |
_version_ |
1724448112386244608 |