The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms

The analysis of spatial relationship, or configuration, among the components of a character is important for visual word form recognition (Kao et al., 2010). We investigated such spatial configuration processing in dyslexics and developing populations. Four types of characters: real- and non-charact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chienhui Kao, Hsiaolan Wang, Chienchung Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-05-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/ic261
id doaj-17a8b66c18c3454d8fe41cd163f3d2ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17a8b66c18c3454d8fe41cd163f3d2ae2020-11-25T04:01:00ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952011-05-01210.1068/ic26110.1068_ic261The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word FormsChienhui Kao0Hsiaolan Wang1Chienchung Chen2Department of Psychology, National Taiwan UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Cambridge UniversityDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan UniversityThe analysis of spatial relationship, or configuration, among the components of a character is important for visual word form recognition (Kao et al., 2010). We investigated such spatial configuration processing in dyslexics and developing populations. Four types of characters: real- and non-characters and their upside-down versions were used in this study. The task of the observers was to determine whether two characters presented on the display were identical. One group of dyslexic children (Dys) and two groups of non-dyslexic controls, one (RL) matched Dys in reading performance and the other (CA) matched in age, were recruited in this study. Dys performed significantly worse than the control groups for all character types, suggesting a worse visual word form processing in dyslexics. For Dys and CA, the proportional correct response for the upright real characters was better than that for their upside-down versions. RL, (which was younger) showed the same effect for the non-characters. Since the non-characters disrupts the global configuration while the inverted characters disrupted both local and global configurations, our results suggest that younger children recognize a word with an analysis of the local configuration while older children, regardless of whether they are dyslexics or not, analyze the global configuration.https://doi.org/10.1068/ic261
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chienhui Kao
Hsiaolan Wang
Chienchung Chen
spellingShingle Chienhui Kao
Hsiaolan Wang
Chienchung Chen
The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms
i-Perception
author_facet Chienhui Kao
Hsiaolan Wang
Chienchung Chen
author_sort Chienhui Kao
title The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms
title_short The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms
title_full The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms
title_fullStr The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms
title_full_unstemmed The Development of Spatial Configuration Processing of Visual Word Forms
title_sort development of spatial configuration processing of visual word forms
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2011-05-01
description The analysis of spatial relationship, or configuration, among the components of a character is important for visual word form recognition (Kao et al., 2010). We investigated such spatial configuration processing in dyslexics and developing populations. Four types of characters: real- and non-characters and their upside-down versions were used in this study. The task of the observers was to determine whether two characters presented on the display were identical. One group of dyslexic children (Dys) and two groups of non-dyslexic controls, one (RL) matched Dys in reading performance and the other (CA) matched in age, were recruited in this study. Dys performed significantly worse than the control groups for all character types, suggesting a worse visual word form processing in dyslexics. For Dys and CA, the proportional correct response for the upright real characters was better than that for their upside-down versions. RL, (which was younger) showed the same effect for the non-characters. Since the non-characters disrupts the global configuration while the inverted characters disrupted both local and global configurations, our results suggest that younger children recognize a word with an analysis of the local configuration while older children, regardless of whether they are dyslexics or not, analyze the global configuration.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/ic261
work_keys_str_mv AT chienhuikao thedevelopmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms
AT hsiaolanwang thedevelopmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms
AT chienchungchen thedevelopmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms
AT chienhuikao developmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms
AT hsiaolanwang developmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms
AT chienchungchen developmentofspatialconfigurationprocessingofvisualwordforms
_version_ 1724448112386244608