A Comparison of Conventional and Microwave Decalcification and Processing of Tooth and Mandibular Bone Specimens
Introduction: Any laboratory procedure exposes the technician and the pathologists to the hazardous effects of chemicals. Conventional procedures like decalcification and histoprocessing employed in laboratories are labour intense and time consuming thereby delaying the report dispatch. The prese...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8694/21015_CE(EK)_F(AK)_PF1(EK_RK)_PFA_PF2(EKAK).pdf |
Summary: | Introduction: Any laboratory procedure exposes the technician
and the pathologists to the hazardous effects of chemicals.
Conventional procedures like decalcification and histoprocessing employed in laboratories are labour intense and time
consuming thereby delaying the report dispatch. The present
study was an attempt to employ a kitchen microwave to hasten
the process and facilitate faster and accurate reporting; thus,
benefitting the technician, pathologist and the patient.
Aim: To compare conventional and microwave based decalcification, processing and staining of tooth and mandibular bone
specimens using 5% nitric acid as decalcifying agent.
Materials and Methods: The sample included formalin fixed
180 tooth specimens (60 incisors, 60 premolars, 60 molars)
and 60 mandibular bone specimens (approx 0.5cm each). The
hard tissue specimens were subjected to varying combination
of conventional and microwave decalcification, processing and
staining. The entire procedure was blinded and evaluated by
two examiners.
Results: Conventional Decalcification (CD), processing and
staining produced the utmost quality, though consuming
a relatively longer duration. Microwave reduced the total
decalcification time by half and retained the diagnostic quality
of the specimens. On the contrary the microwave based
processing and staining caused significant damage to the
tissues rendering sections un-diagnostic.
Conclusion: A combination of Microwave Decalcification (MD)
followed by Conventional Processing (CP) and staining would
be ideal to hasten the overall laboratory time with minimal
compromise on tissue quality. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2249-782X 0973-709X |