Surgical outcomes and risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with cervical spine metastasis: a prospective study

• Main Authors: Yutaro Kanda, Kenichiro Kakutani, Yoshitada Sakai, Zhongying Zhang, Takashi Yurube, Shingo Miyazaki, Yuji Kakiuchi, Yoshiki Takeoka, Ryu Tsujimoto, Kunihiko Miyazaki, Hiroki Ohnishi, Yuichi Hoshino, Toru Takada, Ryosuke Kuroda
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2021-07-01
• Series: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
• Subjects: Cervical spine metastasis; Quality of life; Cervicothoracic junction; Palliative surgery; Performance status
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02562-8

Abstract Background Few studies have addressed the impact of palliative surgery for cervical spine metastasis on patients’ performance status (PS) and quality of life (QOL). We investigated the surgical outcomes of patients with cervical spine metastasis and the risk factors for a poor outcome with a focus on the PS and QOL. Methods We prospectively analyzed patients with cervical spine metastasis who underwent palliative surgery from 2013 to 2018. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS (ECOGPS) and EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ5D) score were assessed at study enrollment and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Neurological function was evaluated with Frankel grading. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for a poor surgical outcome, defined as no improvement or deterioration after improvement of the ECOGPS or EQ5D score within 3 months. Results Forty-six patients (mean age, 67.5 ± 11.7 years) were enrolled. Twelve postoperative complications occurred in 11 (23.9%) patients. The median ECOGPS improved from PS3 at study enrolment to PS2 at 1 month and PS1 at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The mean EQ5D score improved from 0.085 ± 0.487 at study enrolment to 0.658 ± 0.356 at 1 month and 0.753 ± 0.312 at 3 months. A poor outcome was observed in 18 (39.1%) patients. The univariate analysis showed that variables with a P value of < 0.10 were sex (male), the revised Tokuhashi score, the new Katagiri score, the level of the main lesion, and the Frankel grade at baseline. The multivariate analysis identified the level of the main lesion (cervicothoracic junction) as the significant risk factor (odds ratio, 5.00; P = 0.025). Conclusions Palliative surgery for cervical spine metastasis improved the PS and QOL, but a cervicothoracic junction lesion could be a risk factor for a poor outcome.