Can Resilience be Reconciled with Globalization and the Increasingly Complex Conditions of Resource Degradation in Asian Coastal Regions?

This paper explores the relationship between resilience and globalization. We are concerned, most importantly, with whether resilience is a suitable conceptual framework for natural resource management in the context of the rapid changes and disruptions that globalization causes in social-ecological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derek Armitage, Derek Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2006-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art2/
id doaj-17900f89c6f54d5aa7ee78db0490708c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17900f89c6f54d5aa7ee78db0490708c2020-11-24T22:56:22ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872006-06-01111210.5751/ES-01485-1101021485Can Resilience be Reconciled with Globalization and the Increasingly Complex Conditions of Resource Degradation in Asian Coastal Regions?Derek Armitage0Derek Johnson1Wilfrid Laurier UniversityCentre for Maritime ResearchThis paper explores the relationship between resilience and globalization. We are concerned, most importantly, with whether resilience is a suitable conceptual framework for natural resource management in the context of the rapid changes and disruptions that globalization causes in social-ecological systems. Although theoretical in scope, we ground this analysis using our experiences in two Asian coastal areas: Junagadh District in Gujarat State, India and Banawa Selatan, in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. We present the histories of resource exploitation in the two areas, and we attempt to combine a resilience perspective with close attention to the impact of globalization. Our efforts serve as a basis from which to examine the conceptual and practical compatibility of resilience with globalization. The first challenge we address is epistemological: given that resilience and globalization have roots in different disciplines, do they share a sufficiently common perception of change and human action to be compatible? Second, we address the issue of how resilience can be a viable management objective in the rapidly changing context of globalization. We identify scale as particularly important in this regard.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art2/globalizationresiliencecomplexityIndiaIndonesiaresource managementcoastal managementsocial-ecological systemsustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Derek Armitage
Derek Johnson
spellingShingle Derek Armitage
Derek Johnson
Can Resilience be Reconciled with Globalization and the Increasingly Complex Conditions of Resource Degradation in Asian Coastal Regions?
Ecology and Society
globalization
resilience
complexity
India
Indonesia
resource management
coastal management
social-ecological system
sustainability
author_facet Derek Armitage
Derek Johnson
author_sort Derek Armitage
title Can Resilience be Reconciled with Globalization and the Increasingly Complex Conditions of Resource Degradation in Asian Coastal Regions?
title_short Can Resilience be Reconciled with Globalization and the Increasingly Complex Conditions of Resource Degradation in Asian Coastal Regions?
title_full Can Resilience be Reconciled with Globalization and the Increasingly Complex Conditions of Resource Degradation in Asian Coastal Regions?
title_fullStr Can Resilience be Reconciled with Globalization and the Increasingly Complex Conditions of Resource Degradation in Asian Coastal Regions?
title_full_unstemmed Can Resilience be Reconciled with Globalization and the Increasingly Complex Conditions of Resource Degradation in Asian Coastal Regions?
title_sort can resilience be reconciled with globalization and the increasingly complex conditions of resource degradation in asian coastal regions?
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2006-06-01
description This paper explores the relationship between resilience and globalization. We are concerned, most importantly, with whether resilience is a suitable conceptual framework for natural resource management in the context of the rapid changes and disruptions that globalization causes in social-ecological systems. Although theoretical in scope, we ground this analysis using our experiences in two Asian coastal areas: Junagadh District in Gujarat State, India and Banawa Selatan, in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. We present the histories of resource exploitation in the two areas, and we attempt to combine a resilience perspective with close attention to the impact of globalization. Our efforts serve as a basis from which to examine the conceptual and practical compatibility of resilience with globalization. The first challenge we address is epistemological: given that resilience and globalization have roots in different disciplines, do they share a sufficiently common perception of change and human action to be compatible? Second, we address the issue of how resilience can be a viable management objective in the rapidly changing context of globalization. We identify scale as particularly important in this regard.
topic globalization
resilience
complexity
India
Indonesia
resource management
coastal management
social-ecological system
sustainability
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art2/
work_keys_str_mv AT derekarmitage canresiliencebereconciledwithglobalizationandtheincreasinglycomplexconditionsofresourcedegradationinasiancoastalregions
AT derekjohnson canresiliencebereconciledwithglobalizationandtheincreasinglycomplexconditionsofresourcedegradationinasiancoastalregions
_version_ 1716390312596733952