Global and National Socioeconomic Disparities in Obesity, Overweight, and Underweight Status

Objective. To examine the association between socioeconomic factors and weight status across 53 countries. Methods. Data are cross-sectional and from the long version of the World Health Survey (WHS). There were 172,625 WHS participants who provided self-reported height and weight measures and socio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Spencer Moore, Justin N. Hall, Sam Harper, John W. Lynch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/514674
id doaj-177950b7d8f1441db8bb4abc896c3136
record_format Article
spelling doaj-177950b7d8f1441db8bb4abc896c31362020-11-24T20:58:21ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162010-01-01201010.1155/2010/514674514674Global and National Socioeconomic Disparities in Obesity, Overweight, and Underweight StatusSpencer Moore0Justin N. Hall1Sam Harper2John W. Lynch3School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division Street Room 310-F, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, CanadaSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division Street Room 310-F, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, CanadaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, H3A 1A2, CanadaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, H3A 1A2, CanadaObjective. To examine the association between socioeconomic factors and weight status across 53 countries. Methods. Data are cross-sectional and from the long version of the World Health Survey (WHS). There were 172,625 WHS participants who provided self-reported height and weight measures and sociodemographic information. The International Classification of adult weight status was used to classify participants by body mass index (BMI): (1) underweight (<18.5), (2) normal weight (18.5–24.9), (3) overweight (25.0–29.9), and (4) obese (>30.0). Multinomial regression was used in the analyses. Results. Globally, 6.7% was underweight, 25.7% overweight, and 8.9% obese. Underweight status was least (5.8%) and obesity (9.3%) most prevalent in the richest quintile. There was variability between countries, with a tendency for lower-income quintiles to be at increased risk for underweight and reduced risk for obesity. Conclusion. International policies may require flexibility in addressing cross-national differences in the socio-economic covariates of BMI status.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/514674
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Spencer Moore
Justin N. Hall
Sam Harper
John W. Lynch
spellingShingle Spencer Moore
Justin N. Hall
Sam Harper
John W. Lynch
Global and National Socioeconomic Disparities in Obesity, Overweight, and Underweight Status
Journal of Obesity
author_facet Spencer Moore
Justin N. Hall
Sam Harper
John W. Lynch
author_sort Spencer Moore
title Global and National Socioeconomic Disparities in Obesity, Overweight, and Underweight Status
title_short Global and National Socioeconomic Disparities in Obesity, Overweight, and Underweight Status
title_full Global and National Socioeconomic Disparities in Obesity, Overweight, and Underweight Status
title_fullStr Global and National Socioeconomic Disparities in Obesity, Overweight, and Underweight Status
title_full_unstemmed Global and National Socioeconomic Disparities in Obesity, Overweight, and Underweight Status
title_sort global and national socioeconomic disparities in obesity, overweight, and underweight status
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Obesity
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Objective. To examine the association between socioeconomic factors and weight status across 53 countries. Methods. Data are cross-sectional and from the long version of the World Health Survey (WHS). There were 172,625 WHS participants who provided self-reported height and weight measures and sociodemographic information. The International Classification of adult weight status was used to classify participants by body mass index (BMI): (1) underweight (<18.5), (2) normal weight (18.5–24.9), (3) overweight (25.0–29.9), and (4) obese (>30.0). Multinomial regression was used in the analyses. Results. Globally, 6.7% was underweight, 25.7% overweight, and 8.9% obese. Underweight status was least (5.8%) and obesity (9.3%) most prevalent in the richest quintile. There was variability between countries, with a tendency for lower-income quintiles to be at increased risk for underweight and reduced risk for obesity. Conclusion. International policies may require flexibility in addressing cross-national differences in the socio-economic covariates of BMI status.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/514674
work_keys_str_mv AT spencermoore globalandnationalsocioeconomicdisparitiesinobesityoverweightandunderweightstatus
AT justinnhall globalandnationalsocioeconomicdisparitiesinobesityoverweightandunderweightstatus
AT samharper globalandnationalsocioeconomicdisparitiesinobesityoverweightandunderweightstatus
AT johnwlynch globalandnationalsocioeconomicdisparitiesinobesityoverweightandunderweightstatus
_version_ 1716786114231009280