The Limits of Auteurism: Case Studies in the Critically Constructed New Hollywood, by Nicholas Godfrey

At a time when even Martin Scorsese cannot offer a polite critique of the Marvel industrial complex without suffering the umbrage of his fellow Hollywood elites, it is bracing to read the words of an industry insider truly, unapologetically sounding off on what he perceives to be the failures of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryan Sherwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University College Cork 2020-07-01
Series:Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue19/HTML/ReviewSherwood.html
id doaj-1774d325b20647cc831eb0452aee329d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1774d325b20647cc831eb0452aee329d2021-04-12T12:08:25ZengUniversity College CorkAlphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media2009-40782020-07-0119242247https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.19.23The Limits of Auteurism: Case Studies in the Critically Constructed New Hollywood, by Nicholas GodfreyRyan Sherwoodhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1449-3227At a time when even Martin Scorsese cannot offer a polite critique of the Marvel industrial complex without suffering the umbrage of his fellow Hollywood elites, it is bracing to read the words of an industry insider truly, unapologetically sounding off on what he perceives to be the failures of the American cinema. In a 1972 Gallery interview, Dennis Hopper—whose 1969 directorial debut, Easy Rider, supposedly galvanised the much-mythologised New Hollywood period—shared his grim assessment of his cohort’s most celebrated work. The so-called “art films” of such directors as John Cassavetes, Bob Rafelson, and Peter Bogdanovich were, in Hopper’s opinion, nothing of the sort, devoid of “things that haven’t been done a million times before by directors like Howard Hawks, Joseph Mankiewicz, George Stevens, John Ford, and Henry Hathaway” (qtd. in Godfrey 211). Presuming to speak directly to his peers, Hopper insisted, “you’re no longer inventing anything, you’re no longer contributing to the evolution of your art” (211).http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue19/HTML/ReviewSherwood.htmlauteurismdirectorshollywoodmarketingreception
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryan Sherwood
spellingShingle Ryan Sherwood
The Limits of Auteurism: Case Studies in the Critically Constructed New Hollywood, by Nicholas Godfrey
Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media
auteurism
directors
hollywood
marketing
reception
author_facet Ryan Sherwood
author_sort Ryan Sherwood
title The Limits of Auteurism: Case Studies in the Critically Constructed New Hollywood, by Nicholas Godfrey
title_short The Limits of Auteurism: Case Studies in the Critically Constructed New Hollywood, by Nicholas Godfrey
title_full The Limits of Auteurism: Case Studies in the Critically Constructed New Hollywood, by Nicholas Godfrey
title_fullStr The Limits of Auteurism: Case Studies in the Critically Constructed New Hollywood, by Nicholas Godfrey
title_full_unstemmed The Limits of Auteurism: Case Studies in the Critically Constructed New Hollywood, by Nicholas Godfrey
title_sort limits of auteurism: case studies in the critically constructed new hollywood, by nicholas godfrey
publisher University College Cork
series Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media
issn 2009-4078
publishDate 2020-07-01
description At a time when even Martin Scorsese cannot offer a polite critique of the Marvel industrial complex without suffering the umbrage of his fellow Hollywood elites, it is bracing to read the words of an industry insider truly, unapologetically sounding off on what he perceives to be the failures of the American cinema. In a 1972 Gallery interview, Dennis Hopper—whose 1969 directorial debut, Easy Rider, supposedly galvanised the much-mythologised New Hollywood period—shared his grim assessment of his cohort’s most celebrated work. The so-called “art films” of such directors as John Cassavetes, Bob Rafelson, and Peter Bogdanovich were, in Hopper’s opinion, nothing of the sort, devoid of “things that haven’t been done a million times before by directors like Howard Hawks, Joseph Mankiewicz, George Stevens, John Ford, and Henry Hathaway” (qtd. in Godfrey 211). Presuming to speak directly to his peers, Hopper insisted, “you’re no longer inventing anything, you’re no longer contributing to the evolution of your art” (211).
topic auteurism
directors
hollywood
marketing
reception
url http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue19/HTML/ReviewSherwood.html
work_keys_str_mv AT ryansherwood thelimitsofauteurismcasestudiesinthecriticallyconstructednewhollywoodbynicholasgodfrey
AT ryansherwood limitsofauteurismcasestudiesinthecriticallyconstructednewhollywoodbynicholasgodfrey
_version_ 1721530000827482112