Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions
Should moods be regarded as intentional states, and, if so, what kind of intentional content do they have? I focus on irritability (understood as an angry mood) and apprehension (understood as a fearful mood), which I examine from the perspective of a teleosemantic theory of content. Eric Lormand ha...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
2006-01-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Analytic Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/135314 |
id |
doaj-176bda965ef24615bff58d3dfff6c3d7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-176bda965ef24615bff58d3dfff6c3d72020-11-25T03:27:37ZengUniversity of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences European Journal of Analytic Philosophy1845-84751849-05142006-01-01214968Affect without object: moods and objectless emotionsCarolyn PriceShould moods be regarded as intentional states, and, if so, what kind of intentional content do they have? I focus on irritability (understood as an angry mood) and apprehension (understood as a fearful mood), which I examine from the perspective of a teleosemantic theory of content. Eric Lormand has argued that moods are non-intentional states, distinct from emotions; Robert Solomon and Peter Goldie argue that moods are generalised emotions and that they have intentional content of a correspondingly general kind. I present a third model, on which moods are regarded, not as generalised emotions, but as states of vigilance; and I argue that, on this model, moods should be regarded as intentional states of a kind quite distinct from emotions. An advantage of this account is that it allows us to distinguish between a mood of apprehension and an episode of objectless fear.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/135314emotionmoodintentionalityteleosemantic theory of contentstate of vigilance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carolyn Price |
spellingShingle |
Carolyn Price Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions European Journal of Analytic Philosophy emotion mood intentionality teleosemantic theory of content state of vigilance |
author_facet |
Carolyn Price |
author_sort |
Carolyn Price |
title |
Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions |
title_short |
Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions |
title_full |
Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions |
title_fullStr |
Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions |
title_sort |
affect without object: moods and objectless emotions |
publisher |
University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
series |
European Journal of Analytic Philosophy |
issn |
1845-8475 1849-0514 |
publishDate |
2006-01-01 |
description |
Should moods be regarded as intentional states, and, if so, what kind of intentional content do they have? I focus on irritability (understood as an angry mood) and apprehension (understood as a fearful mood), which I examine from the perspective of a teleosemantic theory of content. Eric Lormand has argued that moods are non-intentional states, distinct from emotions; Robert Solomon and Peter Goldie argue that moods are generalised emotions and that they have intentional content of a correspondingly general kind. I present a third model, on which moods are regarded, not as generalised emotions, but as states of vigilance; and I argue that, on this model, moods should be regarded as intentional states of a kind quite distinct from emotions. An advantage of this account is that it allows us to distinguish between a mood of apprehension and an episode of objectless fear. |
topic |
emotion mood intentionality teleosemantic theory of content state of vigilance |
url |
https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/135314 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carolynprice affectwithoutobjectmoodsandobjectlessemotions |
_version_ |
1724588098058190848 |