Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions

Should moods be regarded as intentional states, and, if so, what kind of intentional content do they have? I focus on irritability (understood as an angry mood) and apprehension (understood as a fearful mood), which I examine from the perspective of a teleosemantic theory of content. Eric Lormand ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carolyn Price
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences 2006-01-01
Series:European Journal of Analytic Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/135314
id doaj-176bda965ef24615bff58d3dfff6c3d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-176bda965ef24615bff58d3dfff6c3d72020-11-25T03:27:37ZengUniversity of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences European Journal of Analytic Philosophy1845-84751849-05142006-01-01214968Affect without object: moods and objectless emotionsCarolyn PriceShould moods be regarded as intentional states, and, if so, what kind of intentional content do they have? I focus on irritability (understood as an angry mood) and apprehension (understood as a fearful mood), which I examine from the perspective of a teleosemantic theory of content. Eric Lormand has argued that moods are non-intentional states, distinct from emotions; Robert Solomon and Peter Goldie argue that moods are generalised emotions and that they have intentional content of a correspondingly general kind. I present a third model, on which moods are regarded, not as generalised emotions, but as states of vigilance; and I argue that, on this model, moods should be regarded as intentional states of a kind quite distinct from emotions. An advantage of this account is that it allows us to distinguish between a mood of apprehension and an episode of objectless fear.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/135314emotionmoodintentionalityteleosemantic theory of contentstate of vigilance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carolyn Price
spellingShingle Carolyn Price
Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions
European Journal of Analytic Philosophy
emotion
mood
intentionality
teleosemantic theory of content
state of vigilance
author_facet Carolyn Price
author_sort Carolyn Price
title Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions
title_short Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions
title_full Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions
title_fullStr Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions
title_full_unstemmed Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions
title_sort affect without object: moods and objectless emotions
publisher University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
series European Journal of Analytic Philosophy
issn 1845-8475
1849-0514
publishDate 2006-01-01
description Should moods be regarded as intentional states, and, if so, what kind of intentional content do they have? I focus on irritability (understood as an angry mood) and apprehension (understood as a fearful mood), which I examine from the perspective of a teleosemantic theory of content. Eric Lormand has argued that moods are non-intentional states, distinct from emotions; Robert Solomon and Peter Goldie argue that moods are generalised emotions and that they have intentional content of a correspondingly general kind. I present a third model, on which moods are regarded, not as generalised emotions, but as states of vigilance; and I argue that, on this model, moods should be regarded as intentional states of a kind quite distinct from emotions. An advantage of this account is that it allows us to distinguish between a mood of apprehension and an episode of objectless fear.
topic emotion
mood
intentionality
teleosemantic theory of content
state of vigilance
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/135314
work_keys_str_mv AT carolynprice affectwithoutobjectmoodsandobjectlessemotions
_version_ 1724588098058190848