Staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? A literature review
<p>Immobile populations have received academic attention in recent years, following a period of focus on hypermobility and increasing migration as the main research interest. This article analyses the existing stock of literature on the topics of “immobilities” and “staying” to give insight in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Geographica Helvetica |
Online Access: | https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/76/275/2021/gh-76-275-2021.pdf |
id |
doaj-1761978c991a4711b61185a2a1212aeb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1761978c991a4711b61185a2a1212aeb2021-06-15T13:26:10ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982021-06-017627528410.5194/gh-76-275-2021Staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? A literature reviewE. Gruber<p>Immobile populations have received academic attention in recent years, following a period of focus on hypermobility and increasing migration as the main research interest. This article analyses the existing stock of literature on the topics of “immobilities” and “staying” to give insight into the importance of these concepts for rethinking contemporary population geography. It considers texts dealing with voluntary and involuntary types of immobility, as well as reasons for and factors influencing the increased observed immobility in the context of internal migration. Common theoretical frameworks used to explain immobilities and consequences for increasingly rooted societies are discussed. The paper also presents open research questions for future research. It draws the conclusion that staying and immobility are meaningful concepts for future research in the context of population and human geography, since they introduce a new perspective for research dedicated to spatial living patterns of populations. These concepts furthermore highlight the importance of different types and forms of (im)mobilities, the interconnectedness of mobile and immobile populations, and changes in aspirations and capabilities of life-course decision-making over time.</p>https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/76/275/2021/gh-76-275-2021.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
E. Gruber |
spellingShingle |
E. Gruber Staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? A literature review Geographica Helvetica |
author_facet |
E. Gruber |
author_sort |
E. Gruber |
title |
Staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? A literature review |
title_short |
Staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? A literature review |
title_full |
Staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? A literature review |
title_fullStr |
Staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? A literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? A literature review |
title_sort |
staying and immobility: new concepts in population geography? a literature review |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geographica Helvetica |
issn |
0016-7312 2194-8798 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
<p>Immobile populations have received academic attention in recent years, following a period of focus on hypermobility and increasing migration as the main research interest. This article analyses the existing stock of literature on the topics of “immobilities” and “staying” to give insight into the importance of these concepts for rethinking contemporary population geography. It considers texts dealing with voluntary and involuntary types of immobility, as well as reasons for and factors influencing the increased observed immobility in the context of internal migration. Common theoretical frameworks used to explain immobilities and consequences for increasingly rooted societies are discussed. The paper also presents open research questions for future research. It draws the conclusion that staying and immobility are meaningful concepts for future research in the context of population and human geography, since they introduce a new perspective for research dedicated to spatial living patterns of populations. These concepts furthermore highlight the importance of different types and forms of (im)mobilities, the interconnectedness of mobile and immobile populations, and changes in aspirations and capabilities of life-course decision-making over time.</p> |
url |
https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/76/275/2021/gh-76-275-2021.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT egruber stayingandimmobilitynewconceptsinpopulationgeographyaliteraturereview |
_version_ |
1721376007017988096 |