Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review

Abstract Introduction Ectopic sinonasal teeth are uncommon. The classic approach to removal of such foreign bodies was the Caldwell-Luc. In recent years however, endoscopic approaches have become increasingly utilized. Despite this, there is a dearth of literature and consensus regarding the endosco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc Levin, Doron D. Sommer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0353-8
id doaj-1755fff9056344ef824ad18caabec073
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1755fff9056344ef824ad18caabec0732020-11-25T03:04:25ZengBMCJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162019-07-014811910.1186/s40463-019-0353-8Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic reviewMarc Levin0Doron D. Sommer1Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityAbstract Introduction Ectopic sinonasal teeth are uncommon. The classic approach to removal of such foreign bodies was the Caldwell-Luc. In recent years however, endoscopic approaches have become increasingly utilized. Despite this, there is a dearth of literature and consensus regarding the endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth. As such, we conducted a systematic review on all cases of endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth in the literature. With an understanding of the literature, clinical and technical decision making for patients with this pathology may be elucidated. Methods Systematic review of the Ovid Medline, EMBASE Classic and Pubmed databases were conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Results Our search identified 100 articles. Final inclusion consisted of 23 studies with a total of 27 patient cases. The majority of the patients included were male (70.4%) with a mean age of 27.06 years. Patients presented with a multitude of symptoms, with nasal obstruction (48.14%), rhinorrhea (22.2%), facial pain (22.2%) and epistaxis (22.2%) being most common. Surgeons mostly reported using a 0° endoscope (22.2%) and performing a maxillary antrostomy/uncinectomy (37%) and simple extraction under general anesthetic (41%). Conclusions This systematic review analyzed important epidemiological, clinical and technical information regarding patients with endoscopic removal of sinonasal ectopic teeth. Further research is needed to promote implementation of such data into clinical practice.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0353-8Endoscopic sinus surgeryEctopic sinonasal teethEndoscopic teeth removalCaldwell-LucChronic rhinosinusitis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marc Levin
Doron D. Sommer
spellingShingle Marc Levin
Doron D. Sommer
Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Endoscopic sinus surgery
Ectopic sinonasal teeth
Endoscopic teeth removal
Caldwell-Luc
Chronic rhinosinusitis
author_facet Marc Levin
Doron D. Sommer
author_sort Marc Levin
title Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_short Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_full Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_fullStr Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_sort endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
issn 1916-0216
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract Introduction Ectopic sinonasal teeth are uncommon. The classic approach to removal of such foreign bodies was the Caldwell-Luc. In recent years however, endoscopic approaches have become increasingly utilized. Despite this, there is a dearth of literature and consensus regarding the endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth. As such, we conducted a systematic review on all cases of endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth in the literature. With an understanding of the literature, clinical and technical decision making for patients with this pathology may be elucidated. Methods Systematic review of the Ovid Medline, EMBASE Classic and Pubmed databases were conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Results Our search identified 100 articles. Final inclusion consisted of 23 studies with a total of 27 patient cases. The majority of the patients included were male (70.4%) with a mean age of 27.06 years. Patients presented with a multitude of symptoms, with nasal obstruction (48.14%), rhinorrhea (22.2%), facial pain (22.2%) and epistaxis (22.2%) being most common. Surgeons mostly reported using a 0° endoscope (22.2%) and performing a maxillary antrostomy/uncinectomy (37%) and simple extraction under general anesthetic (41%). Conclusions This systematic review analyzed important epidemiological, clinical and technical information regarding patients with endoscopic removal of sinonasal ectopic teeth. Further research is needed to promote implementation of such data into clinical practice.
topic Endoscopic sinus surgery
Ectopic sinonasal teeth
Endoscopic teeth removal
Caldwell-Luc
Chronic rhinosinusitis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0353-8
work_keys_str_mv AT marclevin endoscopicremovalofectopicsinonasalteethasystematicreview
AT dorondsommer endoscopicremovalofectopicsinonasalteethasystematicreview
_version_ 1724681979659550720