The filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug users

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Injection drug use syringe filters (IDUSF) are designed to prevent several complications related to the injection of drugs. Due to their small pore size, their use can reduce the solution's insoluble particle content and thus di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keijzer Lenneke, Imbert Elliot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-08-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Online Access:http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/8/1/20
id doaj-175262fd5277467ba9c51756523763d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-175262fd5277467ba9c51756523763d92020-11-25T01:29:47ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172011-08-01812010.1186/1477-7517-8-20The filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug usersKeijzer LennekeImbert Elliot<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Injection drug use syringe filters (IDUSF) are designed to prevent several complications related to the injection of drugs. Due to their small pore size, their use can reduce the solution's insoluble particle content and thus diminish the prevalence of phlebitis, talcosis.... Their low drug retention discourages from filter reuse and sharing and can thus prevent viral and microbial infections. In France, drug users have access to sterile cotton filters for 15 years and to an IDUSF (the Sterifilt<sup>®</sup>) for 5 years. This study was set up to explore the factors influencing filter preference amongst injecting drug users.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered through 241 questionnaires and the participation of 23 people in focus groups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Factors found to significantly influence filter preference were duration and frequency of injecting drug use, the type of drugs injected and subculture. Furthermore, IDU's rationale for the preference of one type of filter over others was explored. It was found that filter preference depends on perceived health benefits (reduced harms, prevention of vein damage, protection of injection sites), drug retention (low retention: better high, protective mechanism against the reuse of filters; high retention: filter reuse as a protective mechanism against withdrawal), technical and practical issues (filter clogging, ease of use, time needed to prepare an injection) and believes (the conviction that a clear solution contains less active compound).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It was concluded that the factors influencing filter preference are in favour of change; a shift towards the use of more efficient filters can be made through increased availability, information and demonstrations.</p> http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/8/1/20
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keijzer Lenneke
Imbert Elliot
spellingShingle Keijzer Lenneke
Imbert Elliot
The filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug users
Harm Reduction Journal
author_facet Keijzer Lenneke
Imbert Elliot
author_sort Keijzer Lenneke
title The filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug users
title_short The filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug users
title_full The filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug users
title_fullStr The filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug users
title_full_unstemmed The filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug users
title_sort filter of choice: filtration method preference among injecting drug users
publisher BMC
series Harm Reduction Journal
issn 1477-7517
publishDate 2011-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Injection drug use syringe filters (IDUSF) are designed to prevent several complications related to the injection of drugs. Due to their small pore size, their use can reduce the solution's insoluble particle content and thus diminish the prevalence of phlebitis, talcosis.... Their low drug retention discourages from filter reuse and sharing and can thus prevent viral and microbial infections. In France, drug users have access to sterile cotton filters for 15 years and to an IDUSF (the Sterifilt<sup>®</sup>) for 5 years. This study was set up to explore the factors influencing filter preference amongst injecting drug users.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered through 241 questionnaires and the participation of 23 people in focus groups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Factors found to significantly influence filter preference were duration and frequency of injecting drug use, the type of drugs injected and subculture. Furthermore, IDU's rationale for the preference of one type of filter over others was explored. It was found that filter preference depends on perceived health benefits (reduced harms, prevention of vein damage, protection of injection sites), drug retention (low retention: better high, protective mechanism against the reuse of filters; high retention: filter reuse as a protective mechanism against withdrawal), technical and practical issues (filter clogging, ease of use, time needed to prepare an injection) and believes (the conviction that a clear solution contains less active compound).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It was concluded that the factors influencing filter preference are in favour of change; a shift towards the use of more efficient filters can be made through increased availability, information and demonstrations.</p>
url http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/8/1/20
work_keys_str_mv AT keijzerlenneke thefilterofchoicefiltrationmethodpreferenceamonginjectingdrugusers
AT imbertelliot thefilterofchoicefiltrationmethodpreferenceamonginjectingdrugusers
AT keijzerlenneke filterofchoicefiltrationmethodpreferenceamonginjectingdrugusers
AT imbertelliot filterofchoicefiltrationmethodpreferenceamonginjectingdrugusers
_version_ 1725094724715413504