The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements
Three groups of cubic roughness elements non-protruding to the flow were fixed with a specific configuration at the downstream of a stream lined lib sluice gate. The aim was to test the performance of the hydraulic jump under using such elements as appurtenances of stilling basin. The experimental w...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018-01-01
|
Series: | MATEC Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203001 |
id |
doaj-173d04b199e44c97891b9e6244346205 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-173d04b199e44c97891b9e62443462052021-02-02T06:19:22ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011620300110.1051/matecconf/201816203001matecconf_bcee32018_03001The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elementsMaatooq JaafarTaleb EnassThree groups of cubic roughness elements non-protruding to the flow were fixed with a specific configuration at the downstream of a stream lined lib sluice gate. The aim was to test the performance of the hydraulic jump under using such elements as appurtenances of stilling basin. The experimental works has been conducting to test; four different intensities, I=8%, 10%, 12% and 16%; three width to height ratios, We/he=0.75, 1.5 and 2; and three length to height ratios, Le/he=0.75, 2 and 4, of cubic elements made from waterproof stiff rubber. The test was performed under the incoming Froude number; F1 ranged between 2.7 to 9. After analysing the experimental data one from the second group configuration gives a higher reduction of sequent depth ratio, y2/y1 as compared with the depth ratio of the un-forced hydraulic jump which calculated by Belanger equation, this decreases arrived 20%. Also greater relative energy has been dissipated, and the gain in dissipation (%GED) ranged between 10.8-22.3%.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203001 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maatooq Jaafar Taleb Enass |
spellingShingle |
Maatooq Jaafar Taleb Enass The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements MATEC Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Maatooq Jaafar Taleb Enass |
author_sort |
Maatooq Jaafar |
title |
The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements |
title_short |
The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements |
title_full |
The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements |
title_fullStr |
The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements |
title_full_unstemmed |
The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements |
title_sort |
performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-236X |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Three groups of cubic roughness elements non-protruding to the flow were fixed with a specific configuration at the downstream of a stream lined lib sluice gate. The aim was to test the performance of the hydraulic jump under using such elements as appurtenances of stilling basin. The experimental works has been conducting to test; four different intensities, I=8%, 10%, 12% and 16%; three width to height ratios, We/he=0.75, 1.5 and 2; and three length to height ratios, Le/he=0.75, 2 and 4, of cubic elements made from waterproof stiff rubber. The test was performed under the incoming Froude number; F1 ranged between 2.7 to 9. After analysing the experimental data one from the second group configuration gives a higher reduction of sequent depth ratio, y2/y1 as compared with the depth ratio of the un-forced hydraulic jump which calculated by Belanger equation, this decreases arrived 20%. Also greater relative energy has been dissipated, and the gain in dissipation (%GED) ranged between 10.8-22.3%. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203001 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maatooqjaafar theperformanceofhydraulicjumpoverroughbedstillingbasinconsistingofcubicshapeelements AT talebenass theperformanceofhydraulicjumpoverroughbedstillingbasinconsistingofcubicshapeelements AT maatooqjaafar performanceofhydraulicjumpoverroughbedstillingbasinconsistingofcubicshapeelements AT talebenass performanceofhydraulicjumpoverroughbedstillingbasinconsistingofcubicshapeelements |
_version_ |
1724301479847657472 |