The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements

Three groups of cubic roughness elements non-protruding to the flow were fixed with a specific configuration at the downstream of a stream lined lib sluice gate. The aim was to test the performance of the hydraulic jump under using such elements as appurtenances of stilling basin. The experimental w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maatooq Jaafar, Taleb Enass
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203001
id doaj-173d04b199e44c97891b9e6244346205
record_format Article
spelling doaj-173d04b199e44c97891b9e62443462052021-02-02T06:19:22ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011620300110.1051/matecconf/201816203001matecconf_bcee32018_03001The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elementsMaatooq JaafarTaleb EnassThree groups of cubic roughness elements non-protruding to the flow were fixed with a specific configuration at the downstream of a stream lined lib sluice gate. The aim was to test the performance of the hydraulic jump under using such elements as appurtenances of stilling basin. The experimental works has been conducting to test; four different intensities, I=8%, 10%, 12% and 16%; three width to height ratios, We/he=0.75, 1.5 and 2; and three length to height ratios, Le/he=0.75, 2 and 4, of cubic elements made from waterproof stiff rubber. The test was performed under the incoming Froude number; F1 ranged between 2.7 to 9. After analysing the experimental data one from the second group configuration gives a higher reduction of sequent depth ratio, y2/y1 as compared with the depth ratio of the un-forced hydraulic jump which calculated by Belanger equation, this decreases arrived 20%. Also greater relative energy has been dissipated, and the gain in dissipation (%GED) ranged between 10.8-22.3%.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203001
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maatooq Jaafar
Taleb Enass
spellingShingle Maatooq Jaafar
Taleb Enass
The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Maatooq Jaafar
Taleb Enass
author_sort Maatooq Jaafar
title The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements
title_short The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements
title_full The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements
title_fullStr The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements
title_full_unstemmed The performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements
title_sort performance of hydraulic jump over rough bed stilling basin consisting of cubic-shape elements
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Three groups of cubic roughness elements non-protruding to the flow were fixed with a specific configuration at the downstream of a stream lined lib sluice gate. The aim was to test the performance of the hydraulic jump under using such elements as appurtenances of stilling basin. The experimental works has been conducting to test; four different intensities, I=8%, 10%, 12% and 16%; three width to height ratios, We/he=0.75, 1.5 and 2; and three length to height ratios, Le/he=0.75, 2 and 4, of cubic elements made from waterproof stiff rubber. The test was performed under the incoming Froude number; F1 ranged between 2.7 to 9. After analysing the experimental data one from the second group configuration gives a higher reduction of sequent depth ratio, y2/y1 as compared with the depth ratio of the un-forced hydraulic jump which calculated by Belanger equation, this decreases arrived 20%. Also greater relative energy has been dissipated, and the gain in dissipation (%GED) ranged between 10.8-22.3%.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203001
work_keys_str_mv AT maatooqjaafar theperformanceofhydraulicjumpoverroughbedstillingbasinconsistingofcubicshapeelements
AT talebenass theperformanceofhydraulicjumpoverroughbedstillingbasinconsistingofcubicshapeelements
AT maatooqjaafar performanceofhydraulicjumpoverroughbedstillingbasinconsistingofcubicshapeelements
AT talebenass performanceofhydraulicjumpoverroughbedstillingbasinconsistingofcubicshapeelements
_version_ 1724301479847657472