Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.

Numerous devices have been designed to support the back during lifting tasks. To improve the utility of such devices, this research explores the use of preparatory muscle activity to classify muscle loading and initiate appropriate device activation. The goal of this study was to determine the earli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deema Totah, Lauro Ojeda, Daniel D Johnson, Deanna Gates, Emily Mower Provost, Kira Barton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5814006?pdf=render
id doaj-173b7bbcb09a43f58f1c30180096e8b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-173b7bbcb09a43f58f1c30180096e8b32020-11-25T01:24:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019293810.1371/journal.pone.0192938Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.Deema TotahLauro OjedaDaniel D JohnsonDeanna GatesEmily Mower ProvostKira BartonNumerous devices have been designed to support the back during lifting tasks. To improve the utility of such devices, this research explores the use of preparatory muscle activity to classify muscle loading and initiate appropriate device activation. The goal of this study was to determine the earliest time window that enabled accurate load classification during a dynamic lifting task.Nine subjects performed thirty symmetrical lifts, split evenly across three weight conditions (no-weight, 10-lbs and 24-lbs), while low-back muscle activity data was collected. Seven descriptive statistics features were extracted from 100 ms windows of data. A multinomial logistic regression (MLR) classifier was trained and tested, employing leave-one subject out cross-validation, to classify lifted load values. Dimensionality reduction was achieved through feature cross-correlation analysis and greedy feedforward selection. The time of full load support by the subject was defined as load-onset.Regions of highest average classification accuracy started at 200 ms before until 200 ms after load-onset with average accuracies ranging from 80% (±10%) to 81% (±7%). The average recall for each class ranged from 69-92%.These inter-subject classification results indicate that preparatory muscle activity can be leveraged to identify the intent to lift a weight up to 100 ms prior to load-onset. The high accuracies shown indicate the potential to utilize intent classification for assistive device applications.Active assistive devices, e.g. exoskeletons, could prevent back injury by off-loading low-back muscles. Early intent classification allows more time for actuators to respond and integrate seamlessly with the user.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5814006?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deema Totah
Lauro Ojeda
Daniel D Johnson
Deanna Gates
Emily Mower Provost
Kira Barton
spellingShingle Deema Totah
Lauro Ojeda
Daniel D Johnson
Deanna Gates
Emily Mower Provost
Kira Barton
Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Deema Totah
Lauro Ojeda
Daniel D Johnson
Deanna Gates
Emily Mower Provost
Kira Barton
author_sort Deema Totah
title Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.
title_short Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.
title_full Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.
title_fullStr Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.
title_full_unstemmed Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.
title_sort low-back electromyography (emg) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Numerous devices have been designed to support the back during lifting tasks. To improve the utility of such devices, this research explores the use of preparatory muscle activity to classify muscle loading and initiate appropriate device activation. The goal of this study was to determine the earliest time window that enabled accurate load classification during a dynamic lifting task.Nine subjects performed thirty symmetrical lifts, split evenly across three weight conditions (no-weight, 10-lbs and 24-lbs), while low-back muscle activity data was collected. Seven descriptive statistics features were extracted from 100 ms windows of data. A multinomial logistic regression (MLR) classifier was trained and tested, employing leave-one subject out cross-validation, to classify lifted load values. Dimensionality reduction was achieved through feature cross-correlation analysis and greedy feedforward selection. The time of full load support by the subject was defined as load-onset.Regions of highest average classification accuracy started at 200 ms before until 200 ms after load-onset with average accuracies ranging from 80% (±10%) to 81% (±7%). The average recall for each class ranged from 69-92%.These inter-subject classification results indicate that preparatory muscle activity can be leveraged to identify the intent to lift a weight up to 100 ms prior to load-onset. The high accuracies shown indicate the potential to utilize intent classification for assistive device applications.Active assistive devices, e.g. exoskeletons, could prevent back injury by off-loading low-back muscles. Early intent classification allows more time for actuators to respond and integrate seamlessly with the user.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5814006?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT deematotah lowbackelectromyographyemgdatadrivenloadclassificationfordynamicliftingtasks
AT lauroojeda lowbackelectromyographyemgdatadrivenloadclassificationfordynamicliftingtasks
AT danieldjohnson lowbackelectromyographyemgdatadrivenloadclassificationfordynamicliftingtasks
AT deannagates lowbackelectromyographyemgdatadrivenloadclassificationfordynamicliftingtasks
AT emilymowerprovost lowbackelectromyographyemgdatadrivenloadclassificationfordynamicliftingtasks
AT kirabarton lowbackelectromyographyemgdatadrivenloadclassificationfordynamicliftingtasks
_version_ 1725117789820157952