Rasch model analysis of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is a growing awareness of the need for easily administered, psychometrically sound screening tools to identify individuals with elevated levels of psychological distress. Although support has been found for the psychometric pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tennant Alan, Shea Tracey L, Pallant Julie F
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-05-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/9/21
id doaj-17054bbcf6fa4ce1bf9357c8f6eaea4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17054bbcf6fa4ce1bf9357c8f6eaea4c2020-11-24T21:04:43ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2009-05-01912110.1186/1471-244X-9-21Rasch model analysis of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)Tennant AlanShea Tracey LPallant Julie F<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is a growing awareness of the need for easily administered, psychometrically sound screening tools to identify individuals with elevated levels of psychological distress. Although support has been found for the psychometric properties of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS) using classical test theory approaches it has not been subjected to Rasch analysis. The aim of this study was to use Rasch analysis to assess the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 scales, using two different administration modes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The DASS-21 was administered to 420 participants with half the sample responding to a web-based version and the other half completing a traditional pencil-and-paper version. Conformity of DASS-21 scales to a Rasch partial credit model was assessed using the RUMM2020 software.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>To achieve adequate model fit it was necessary to remove one item from each of the DASS-21 subscales. The reduced scales showed adequate internal consistency reliability, unidimensionality and freedom from differential item functioning for sex, age and mode of administration. Analysis of all DASS-21 items combined did not support its use as a measure of general psychological distress. A scale combining the anxiety and stress items showed satisfactory fit to the Rasch model after removal of three items.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The results provide support for the measurement properties, internal consistency reliability, and unidimensionality of three slightly modified DASS-21 scales, across two different administration methods. The further use of Rasch analysis on the DASS-21 in larger and broader samples is recommended to confirm the findings of the current study.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/9/21
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tennant Alan
Shea Tracey L
Pallant Julie F
spellingShingle Tennant Alan
Shea Tracey L
Pallant Julie F
Rasch model analysis of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)
BMC Psychiatry
author_facet Tennant Alan
Shea Tracey L
Pallant Julie F
author_sort Tennant Alan
title Rasch model analysis of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)
title_short Rasch model analysis of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)
title_full Rasch model analysis of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)
title_fullStr Rasch model analysis of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)
title_full_unstemmed Rasch model analysis of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS)
title_sort rasch model analysis of the depression, anxiety and stress scales (dass)
publisher BMC
series BMC Psychiatry
issn 1471-244X
publishDate 2009-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is a growing awareness of the need for easily administered, psychometrically sound screening tools to identify individuals with elevated levels of psychological distress. Although support has been found for the psychometric properties of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS) using classical test theory approaches it has not been subjected to Rasch analysis. The aim of this study was to use Rasch analysis to assess the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 scales, using two different administration modes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The DASS-21 was administered to 420 participants with half the sample responding to a web-based version and the other half completing a traditional pencil-and-paper version. Conformity of DASS-21 scales to a Rasch partial credit model was assessed using the RUMM2020 software.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>To achieve adequate model fit it was necessary to remove one item from each of the DASS-21 subscales. The reduced scales showed adequate internal consistency reliability, unidimensionality and freedom from differential item functioning for sex, age and mode of administration. Analysis of all DASS-21 items combined did not support its use as a measure of general psychological distress. A scale combining the anxiety and stress items showed satisfactory fit to the Rasch model after removal of three items.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The results provide support for the measurement properties, internal consistency reliability, and unidimensionality of three slightly modified DASS-21 scales, across two different administration methods. The further use of Rasch analysis on the DASS-21 in larger and broader samples is recommended to confirm the findings of the current study.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/9/21
work_keys_str_mv AT tennantalan raschmodelanalysisofthedepressionanxietyandstressscalesdass
AT sheatraceyl raschmodelanalysisofthedepressionanxietyandstressscalesdass
AT pallantjulief raschmodelanalysisofthedepressionanxietyandstressscalesdass
_version_ 1716770064415326208