Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To address three methodological challenges when attempting to measure patients' experiences and views of a system of inter-related health services rather than a single service: the feasibility of a population survey for identify...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholl Jon, Knowles Emma, O'Cathain Alicia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-06-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/52
id doaj-16e34340dda34d4e997bd137045635ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16e34340dda34d4e997bd137045635ab2020-11-24T22:38:51ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882010-06-011015210.1186/1471-2288-10-52Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal surveyNicholl JonKnowles EmmaO'Cathain Alicia<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To address three methodological challenges when attempting to measure patients' experiences and views of a system of inter-related health services rather than a single service: the feasibility of a population survey for identifying system users, the optimal recall period for system use, and the mode of administration which is most feasible and representative in the context of routine measurement of system performance.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Postal survey of a random sample of 900 members of the general population and market research telephone survey of quota sample of 1000 members of the general population.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Response rates to the postal and market research telephone population surveys were 51% (457 out of 893 receiving the questionnaire) and 9% (1014 out of 11924 contactable telephone numbers) respectively. Both surveys were able to identify users of the system in the previous three months: 22% (99/457) of postal and 15% (151/1000) of telephone survey respondents. For both surveys, recall of event occurrence reduced by a half after four weeks. The telephone survey more accurately estimated use of individual services within the system than the postal survey. Experiences and views of events remained reasonably stable over the three month recall time period for both modes of administration. Even though the response rate was lower, the telephone survey was more representative of the population, was faster and cheaper to undertake, and had fewer missing values.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>It is possible to identify users of a health care system using a population survey. A recall period of three months can be used to estimate experiences and views but one month is more accurate for estimating use of the system. A quota sample market research telephone survey gives a low response rate yet is more representative and accurate than a postal survey of a random sample of the population.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/52
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicholl Jon
Knowles Emma
O'Cathain Alicia
spellingShingle Nicholl Jon
Knowles Emma
O'Cathain Alicia
Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
BMC Medical Research Methodology
author_facet Nicholl Jon
Knowles Emma
O'Cathain Alicia
author_sort Nicholl Jon
title Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
title_short Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
title_full Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
title_fullStr Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
title_full_unstemmed Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
title_sort testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2010-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To address three methodological challenges when attempting to measure patients' experiences and views of a system of inter-related health services rather than a single service: the feasibility of a population survey for identifying system users, the optimal recall period for system use, and the mode of administration which is most feasible and representative in the context of routine measurement of system performance.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Postal survey of a random sample of 900 members of the general population and market research telephone survey of quota sample of 1000 members of the general population.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Response rates to the postal and market research telephone population surveys were 51% (457 out of 893 receiving the questionnaire) and 9% (1014 out of 11924 contactable telephone numbers) respectively. Both surveys were able to identify users of the system in the previous three months: 22% (99/457) of postal and 15% (151/1000) of telephone survey respondents. For both surveys, recall of event occurrence reduced by a half after four weeks. The telephone survey more accurately estimated use of individual services within the system than the postal survey. Experiences and views of events remained reasonably stable over the three month recall time period for both modes of administration. Even though the response rate was lower, the telephone survey was more representative of the population, was faster and cheaper to undertake, and had fewer missing values.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>It is possible to identify users of a health care system using a population survey. A recall period of three months can be used to estimate experiences and views but one month is more accurate for estimating use of the system. A quota sample market research telephone survey gives a low response rate yet is more representative and accurate than a postal survey of a random sample of the population.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/52
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholljon testingsurveymethodologytomeasurepatientsexperiencesandviewsoftheemergencyandurgentcaresystemtelephoneversuspostalsurvey
AT knowlesemma testingsurveymethodologytomeasurepatientsexperiencesandviewsoftheemergencyandurgentcaresystemtelephoneversuspostalsurvey
AT ocathainalicia testingsurveymethodologytomeasurepatientsexperiencesandviewsoftheemergencyandurgentcaresystemtelephoneversuspostalsurvey
_version_ 1725711570334384128