TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects

Background: Brain mapping is fundamental to understanding brain organization and function. However, a major drawback to the traditional Brodmann parcellation technique is the reliance on the use of postmortem specimens. It has therefore historically been difficult to make any comparison regarding fu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wan-qi Li, Tuo Lin, Xue Li, Ying-hua Jing, Cheng Wu, Meng-ni Li, Qian Ding, Yue Lan, Guang-qing Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-05-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X2030053X
id doaj-16df4d4a637f45e7a29a1bc655661018
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wan-qi Li
Tuo Lin
Xue Li
Ying-hua Jing
Cheng Wu
Meng-ni Li
Qian Ding
Yue Lan
Guang-qing Xu
spellingShingle Wan-qi Li
Tuo Lin
Xue Li
Ying-hua Jing
Cheng Wu
Meng-ni Li
Qian Ding
Yue Lan
Guang-qing Xu
TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects
Brain Stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Motor mapping
Swallowing
Intraluminal catheter
author_facet Wan-qi Li
Tuo Lin
Xue Li
Ying-hua Jing
Cheng Wu
Meng-ni Li
Qian Ding
Yue Lan
Guang-qing Xu
author_sort Wan-qi Li
title TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects
title_short TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects
title_full TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects
title_fullStr TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects
title_full_unstemmed TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects
title_sort tms brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Background: Brain mapping is fundamental to understanding brain organization and function. However, a major drawback to the traditional Brodmann parcellation technique is the reliance on the use of postmortem specimens. It has therefore historically been difficult to make any comparison regarding functional data from different regions or hemispheres within the same individual. Moreover, this method has been significant limited by subjective boundaries and classification criteria and therefore suffer from reproducibility issues. The development of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) offers an alternative approach to brain mapping, specifically the motor cortical regions by eliciting quantifiable functional reactions. Objective: To precisely describe the motor cortical topographic representation of pharyngeal constrictor musculature using TMS and to further map the brain for use as a tool to study brain plasticity. Methods: 51 healthy subjects (20 male/31 female, 19–26 years old) were tested using single-pulse TMS combined with intraluminal catheter-guided high-resolution manometry and a standardized grid cap. We investigated various parameters of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) that include the motor map area, amplitude, latency, center of gravity (CoG) and asymmetry index. Results: Cortically evoked response latencies were similar for the left and right hemispheres at 6.79 ± 0.22 and 7.24 ± 0.27 ms, respectively. The average scalp positions (relative to the vertex) of the pharyngeal motor cortical representation were 10.40 ± 0.19 (SE) cm medio-lateral and 3.20 ± 0.20 (SE) cm antero-posterior in the left hemisphere and 9.65 ± 0.24 (SE) cm medio-lateral and 3.18 ± 0.23 (SE) cm antero-posterior in the right hemisphere. The mean motor map area of the pharynx in the left and right hemispheres were 9.22 ± 0.85(SE) cm2and 10.12 ± 1.24(SE) cm2, respectively. The amplitudes of the MEPs were 35.94 ± 1.81(SE)uV in the left hemisphere and 34.49 ± 1.95(SE)uV in the right hemisphere. By comparison, subtle but consistent differences in the degree of the bilateral hemispheric representation were also apparent both between and within individuals. Conclusion: The swallowing musculature has a bilateral motor cortical representation across individuals, but is largely asymmetric within single subjects. These results suggest that TMS mapping using a guided intra-pharyngeal EMG catheter combined with a standardized gridded cap might be a useful tool to localize brain function/dysfunction by linking brain activation to the corresponding physical reaction.
topic Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Motor mapping
Swallowing
Intraluminal catheter
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X2030053X
work_keys_str_mv AT wanqili tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
AT tuolin tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
AT xueli tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
AT yinghuajing tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
AT chengwu tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
AT mengnili tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
AT qianding tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
AT yuelan tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
AT guangqingxu tmsbrainmappingofthepharyngealcorticalrepresentationinhealthysubjects
_version_ 1724213504570818560
spelling doaj-16df4d4a637f45e7a29a1bc6556610182021-03-19T07:21:49ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2020-05-01133891899TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjectsWan-qi Li0Tuo Lin1Xue Li2Ying-hua Jing3Cheng Wu4Meng-ni Li5Qian Ding6Yue Lan7Guang-qing Xu8Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Corresponding author. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China; Corresponding author. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.Background: Brain mapping is fundamental to understanding brain organization and function. However, a major drawback to the traditional Brodmann parcellation technique is the reliance on the use of postmortem specimens. It has therefore historically been difficult to make any comparison regarding functional data from different regions or hemispheres within the same individual. Moreover, this method has been significant limited by subjective boundaries and classification criteria and therefore suffer from reproducibility issues. The development of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) offers an alternative approach to brain mapping, specifically the motor cortical regions by eliciting quantifiable functional reactions. Objective: To precisely describe the motor cortical topographic representation of pharyngeal constrictor musculature using TMS and to further map the brain for use as a tool to study brain plasticity. Methods: 51 healthy subjects (20 male/31 female, 19–26 years old) were tested using single-pulse TMS combined with intraluminal catheter-guided high-resolution manometry and a standardized grid cap. We investigated various parameters of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) that include the motor map area, amplitude, latency, center of gravity (CoG) and asymmetry index. Results: Cortically evoked response latencies were similar for the left and right hemispheres at 6.79 ± 0.22 and 7.24 ± 0.27 ms, respectively. The average scalp positions (relative to the vertex) of the pharyngeal motor cortical representation were 10.40 ± 0.19 (SE) cm medio-lateral and 3.20 ± 0.20 (SE) cm antero-posterior in the left hemisphere and 9.65 ± 0.24 (SE) cm medio-lateral and 3.18 ± 0.23 (SE) cm antero-posterior in the right hemisphere. The mean motor map area of the pharynx in the left and right hemispheres were 9.22 ± 0.85(SE) cm2and 10.12 ± 1.24(SE) cm2, respectively. The amplitudes of the MEPs were 35.94 ± 1.81(SE)uV in the left hemisphere and 34.49 ± 1.95(SE)uV in the right hemisphere. By comparison, subtle but consistent differences in the degree of the bilateral hemispheric representation were also apparent both between and within individuals. Conclusion: The swallowing musculature has a bilateral motor cortical representation across individuals, but is largely asymmetric within single subjects. These results suggest that TMS mapping using a guided intra-pharyngeal EMG catheter combined with a standardized gridded cap might be a useful tool to localize brain function/dysfunction by linking brain activation to the corresponding physical reaction.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X2030053XTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)Motor mappingSwallowingIntraluminal catheter