The Uyghur Minority in China: A Case Study of Cultural Genocide, Minority Rights and the Insufficiency of the International Legal Framework in Preventing State-Imposed Extinction

Raphael Lemkin, the man who founded the term ‘genocide,’ did so with a view to protecting not only physical beings from systematically imposed extinction, but also protecting their cultures from the same fate. However, in the wake of the atrocities and bloodshed of WWII, cultural...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ciara Finnegan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Laws
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/1/1
id doaj-16dba5ae1a944f4d978e598fadd00fd7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16dba5ae1a944f4d978e598fadd00fd72020-11-25T02:20:43ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2020-01-0191110.3390/laws9010001laws9010001The Uyghur Minority in China: A Case Study of Cultural Genocide, Minority Rights and the Insufficiency of the International Legal Framework in Preventing State-Imposed ExtinctionCiara Finnegan0Department of Law, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, IrelandRaphael Lemkin, the man who founded the term ‘genocide,’ did so with a view to protecting not only physical beings from systematically imposed extinction, but also protecting their cultures from the same fate. However, in the wake of the atrocities and bloodshed of WWII, cultural genocide was omitted from the 1948 Genocide Convention, and as a result, does not constitute an international crime. This omission has left a lacuna in international law which threatens minority groups. Not a threat of loss of life but rather loss of the culture that distinguishes them and identifies them as a minority. Powerful States with indifferent attitudes towards their international obligations face no significantly harsher punishment for cultural genocide than they do for other human rights transgressions. Consequently, cultural genocide continues as minority cultures are rendered extinct at the hands of States. The Case Study of this article investigates the present-day example of the Uyghur minority in China and analyzes whether this modern cultural genocide can pave the way for the recognition of cultural genocide as an international crime or whether the Uyghur culture will become a cautionary tale for minorities in the future.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/1/1uyghuruighurminority rightscultural genocideraphael lemkinchinachina human rightschina counter-terrorismvocational education centresinternational law
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ciara Finnegan
spellingShingle Ciara Finnegan
The Uyghur Minority in China: A Case Study of Cultural Genocide, Minority Rights and the Insufficiency of the International Legal Framework in Preventing State-Imposed Extinction
Laws
uyghur
uighur
minority rights
cultural genocide
raphael lemkin
china
china human rights
china counter-terrorism
vocational education centres
international law
author_facet Ciara Finnegan
author_sort Ciara Finnegan
title The Uyghur Minority in China: A Case Study of Cultural Genocide, Minority Rights and the Insufficiency of the International Legal Framework in Preventing State-Imposed Extinction
title_short The Uyghur Minority in China: A Case Study of Cultural Genocide, Minority Rights and the Insufficiency of the International Legal Framework in Preventing State-Imposed Extinction
title_full The Uyghur Minority in China: A Case Study of Cultural Genocide, Minority Rights and the Insufficiency of the International Legal Framework in Preventing State-Imposed Extinction
title_fullStr The Uyghur Minority in China: A Case Study of Cultural Genocide, Minority Rights and the Insufficiency of the International Legal Framework in Preventing State-Imposed Extinction
title_full_unstemmed The Uyghur Minority in China: A Case Study of Cultural Genocide, Minority Rights and the Insufficiency of the International Legal Framework in Preventing State-Imposed Extinction
title_sort uyghur minority in china: a case study of cultural genocide, minority rights and the insufficiency of the international legal framework in preventing state-imposed extinction
publisher MDPI AG
series Laws
issn 2075-471X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Raphael Lemkin, the man who founded the term ‘genocide,’ did so with a view to protecting not only physical beings from systematically imposed extinction, but also protecting their cultures from the same fate. However, in the wake of the atrocities and bloodshed of WWII, cultural genocide was omitted from the 1948 Genocide Convention, and as a result, does not constitute an international crime. This omission has left a lacuna in international law which threatens minority groups. Not a threat of loss of life but rather loss of the culture that distinguishes them and identifies them as a minority. Powerful States with indifferent attitudes towards their international obligations face no significantly harsher punishment for cultural genocide than they do for other human rights transgressions. Consequently, cultural genocide continues as minority cultures are rendered extinct at the hands of States. The Case Study of this article investigates the present-day example of the Uyghur minority in China and analyzes whether this modern cultural genocide can pave the way for the recognition of cultural genocide as an international crime or whether the Uyghur culture will become a cautionary tale for minorities in the future.
topic uyghur
uighur
minority rights
cultural genocide
raphael lemkin
china
china human rights
china counter-terrorism
vocational education centres
international law
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/1/1
work_keys_str_mv AT ciarafinnegan theuyghurminorityinchinaacasestudyofculturalgenocideminorityrightsandtheinsufficiencyoftheinternationallegalframeworkinpreventingstateimposedextinction
AT ciarafinnegan uyghurminorityinchinaacasestudyofculturalgenocideminorityrightsandtheinsufficiencyoftheinternationallegalframeworkinpreventingstateimposedextinction
_version_ 1724870382913060864