Methodological review to develop a list of bias items used to assess reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: protocol and rationale
Introduction Systematic reviews with network meta-analysis (NMA; ie, multiple treatment comparisons, indirect comparisons) have gained popularity and grown in number due to their ability to provide comparative effectiveness of multiple treatments for the same condition. The methodological review aim...
Main Authors: | Brian Hutton, Georgia Salanti, Sofia Dias, Andrea C Tricco, Carole Lunny, Ian White, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, James M Wright |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-06-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e045987.full |
Similar Items
-
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
by: Jennifer A. Watt, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
by: Areti Angeliki Veroniki, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01) -
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
by: Jennifer Watt, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis
by: Areti Angeliki Veroniki, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Characteristics of networks of interventions: a description of a database of 186 published networks.
by: Adriani Nikolakopoulou, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)