The dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.

In nature, protozoa play a major role in controlling bacterial populations. This paper proposes a microfluidic device for the study of protozoa behaviors change due to their chemotactic response in the presence of bacterial cells. A three-channel microfluidic device was designed using a nitrocellulo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Gaines, Miranda Ludovice, Jie Xu, Marc Zanghi, Richard J Meinersmann, Mark Berrang, Wayne Daley, Doug Britton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222484
id doaj-16bdf82f5ee04d6695d597f50eb2b84f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16bdf82f5ee04d6695d597f50eb2b84f2021-03-03T21:06:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e022248410.1371/journal.pone.0222484The dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.Anna GainesMiranda LudoviceJie XuMarc ZanghiRichard J MeinersmannMark BerrangWayne DaleyDoug BrittonIn nature, protozoa play a major role in controlling bacterial populations. This paper proposes a microfluidic device for the study of protozoa behaviors change due to their chemotactic response in the presence of bacterial cells. A three-channel microfluidic device was designed using a nitrocellulose membrane into which channels were cut using a laser cutter. The membrane was sandwiched between two glass slides; a Euglena suspension was then allowed to flow through the central channel. The two side channels were filled with either, 0.1% peptone as a negative control, or a Listeria suspension respectively. The membrane design prevented direct interaction but allowed Euglena cells to detect Listeria cells as secretions diffused through the nitrocellulose membrane. A significant number of Euglena cells migrated toward the chambers near the bacterial cells, indicating a positive chemotactic response of Euglena toward chemical cues released from Listeria cells. Filtrates collected from Listeria suspension with a series of molecular weight cutoffs (3k, 10k and 100k) were examined in Euglena chemotaxis tests. Euglena cells were attracted to all filtrates collected from the membrane filtration with different molecular weight cutoffs, suggesting small molecules from Listeria might be the chemical cues to attract protozoa. Headspace volatile organic compounds (VOC) released from Listeria were collected, spiked to 0.1% peptone and tested as the chemotactic effectors. It was discovered that the Euglena cells responded quickly to Listeria VOCs including decanal, 3,5- dimethylbenzaldehyde, ethyl acetate, indicating bacterial VOCs were used by Euglena to track the location of bacteria.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222484
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Gaines
Miranda Ludovice
Jie Xu
Marc Zanghi
Richard J Meinersmann
Mark Berrang
Wayne Daley
Doug Britton
spellingShingle Anna Gaines
Miranda Ludovice
Jie Xu
Marc Zanghi
Richard J Meinersmann
Mark Berrang
Wayne Daley
Doug Britton
The dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Anna Gaines
Miranda Ludovice
Jie Xu
Marc Zanghi
Richard J Meinersmann
Mark Berrang
Wayne Daley
Doug Britton
author_sort Anna Gaines
title The dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.
title_short The dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.
title_full The dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.
title_fullStr The dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.
title_full_unstemmed The dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.
title_sort dialogue between protozoa and bacteria in a microfluidic device.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description In nature, protozoa play a major role in controlling bacterial populations. This paper proposes a microfluidic device for the study of protozoa behaviors change due to their chemotactic response in the presence of bacterial cells. A three-channel microfluidic device was designed using a nitrocellulose membrane into which channels were cut using a laser cutter. The membrane was sandwiched between two glass slides; a Euglena suspension was then allowed to flow through the central channel. The two side channels were filled with either, 0.1% peptone as a negative control, or a Listeria suspension respectively. The membrane design prevented direct interaction but allowed Euglena cells to detect Listeria cells as secretions diffused through the nitrocellulose membrane. A significant number of Euglena cells migrated toward the chambers near the bacterial cells, indicating a positive chemotactic response of Euglena toward chemical cues released from Listeria cells. Filtrates collected from Listeria suspension with a series of molecular weight cutoffs (3k, 10k and 100k) were examined in Euglena chemotaxis tests. Euglena cells were attracted to all filtrates collected from the membrane filtration with different molecular weight cutoffs, suggesting small molecules from Listeria might be the chemical cues to attract protozoa. Headspace volatile organic compounds (VOC) released from Listeria were collected, spiked to 0.1% peptone and tested as the chemotactic effectors. It was discovered that the Euglena cells responded quickly to Listeria VOCs including decanal, 3,5- dimethylbenzaldehyde, ethyl acetate, indicating bacterial VOCs were used by Euglena to track the location of bacteria.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222484
work_keys_str_mv AT annagaines thedialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT mirandaludovice thedialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT jiexu thedialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT marczanghi thedialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT richardjmeinersmann thedialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT markberrang thedialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT waynedaley thedialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT dougbritton thedialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT annagaines dialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT mirandaludovice dialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT jiexu dialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT marczanghi dialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT richardjmeinersmann dialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT markberrang dialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT waynedaley dialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
AT dougbritton dialoguebetweenprotozoaandbacteriainamicrofluidicdevice
_version_ 1714818748071804928