The Effect of Growth Promoter Feed Additives on Performance of Broilers Challenged With Escherichia coli

A total of 528 day-old Ross 308 male broilers were used to study the effect of antibiotic, probiotic, prebiotic and organic acid on performance, cecal Coliform load and internal organs’ weight. The chickens were placed into 6 groups with 4 replicates and 22 chickens per pen. Six dietary treatments i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.R Valipouri, Sh Rahimi, T Zahraei Salehi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad 2012-01-01
Series:پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران
Online Access:http://ijasr.um.ac.ir/index.php/animal/article/view/11008
id doaj-16babddf71754e16929e12f62c2e49d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16babddf71754e16929e12f62c2e49d62021-05-02T18:44:32ZfasFerdowsi University of Mashhadپژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران2008-31062423-40012012-01-01324146The Effect of Growth Promoter Feed Additives on Performance of Broilers Challenged With Escherichia coliA.R ValipouriSh RahimiT Zahraei SalehiA total of 528 day-old Ross 308 male broilers were used to study the effect of antibiotic, probiotic, prebiotic and organic acid on performance, cecal Coliform load and internal organs’ weight. The chickens were placed into 6 groups with 4 replicates and 22 chickens per pen. Six dietary treatments included: 1) negative control as basal diet without any antibiotic growth promoter and coccidiostat (Control), 2) Diet 1+ 0.9 g/kg Primalac® (Primalac), 3) Diet 1+0.1 g/kg Bactocell® (Bactocell), 4) Diet 1+15ppm virginiamycin (Virginiamycin), 5) Diet 1+2 g/kg Fermacto® (Fermacto), and 6) Diet 1+2 g/kg Formycin Gold® (Formycin). At day 7 all chickens were orally gavaged with a 0.5 mL of 107 cfu/mL of mixed culture of pathogenic E. coli (O2K12 and O78K80) verified for presence of genes including stx1, stx2, eaeA and hlyA. Eight chickens from each group were euthanized for detection of the challenged bacteria in liver, spleen and cecum content at days 14, 28 and 42. Overall weight gain (Phttp://ijasr.um.ac.ir/index.php/animal/article/view/11008
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A.R Valipouri
Sh Rahimi
T Zahraei Salehi
spellingShingle A.R Valipouri
Sh Rahimi
T Zahraei Salehi
The Effect of Growth Promoter Feed Additives on Performance of Broilers Challenged With Escherichia coli
پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران
author_facet A.R Valipouri
Sh Rahimi
T Zahraei Salehi
author_sort A.R Valipouri
title The Effect of Growth Promoter Feed Additives on Performance of Broilers Challenged With Escherichia coli
title_short The Effect of Growth Promoter Feed Additives on Performance of Broilers Challenged With Escherichia coli
title_full The Effect of Growth Promoter Feed Additives on Performance of Broilers Challenged With Escherichia coli
title_fullStr The Effect of Growth Promoter Feed Additives on Performance of Broilers Challenged With Escherichia coli
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Growth Promoter Feed Additives on Performance of Broilers Challenged With Escherichia coli
title_sort effect of growth promoter feed additives on performance of broilers challenged with escherichia coli
publisher Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
series پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران
issn 2008-3106
2423-4001
publishDate 2012-01-01
description A total of 528 day-old Ross 308 male broilers were used to study the effect of antibiotic, probiotic, prebiotic and organic acid on performance, cecal Coliform load and internal organs’ weight. The chickens were placed into 6 groups with 4 replicates and 22 chickens per pen. Six dietary treatments included: 1) negative control as basal diet without any antibiotic growth promoter and coccidiostat (Control), 2) Diet 1+ 0.9 g/kg Primalac® (Primalac), 3) Diet 1+0.1 g/kg Bactocell® (Bactocell), 4) Diet 1+15ppm virginiamycin (Virginiamycin), 5) Diet 1+2 g/kg Fermacto® (Fermacto), and 6) Diet 1+2 g/kg Formycin Gold® (Formycin). At day 7 all chickens were orally gavaged with a 0.5 mL of 107 cfu/mL of mixed culture of pathogenic E. coli (O2K12 and O78K80) verified for presence of genes including stx1, stx2, eaeA and hlyA. Eight chickens from each group were euthanized for detection of the challenged bacteria in liver, spleen and cecum content at days 14, 28 and 42. Overall weight gain (P
url http://ijasr.um.ac.ir/index.php/animal/article/view/11008
work_keys_str_mv AT arvalipouri theeffectofgrowthpromoterfeedadditivesonperformanceofbroilerschallengedwithescherichiacoli
AT shrahimi theeffectofgrowthpromoterfeedadditivesonperformanceofbroilerschallengedwithescherichiacoli
AT tzahraeisalehi theeffectofgrowthpromoterfeedadditivesonperformanceofbroilerschallengedwithescherichiacoli
AT arvalipouri effectofgrowthpromoterfeedadditivesonperformanceofbroilerschallengedwithescherichiacoli
AT shrahimi effectofgrowthpromoterfeedadditivesonperformanceofbroilerschallengedwithescherichiacoli
AT tzahraeisalehi effectofgrowthpromoterfeedadditivesonperformanceofbroilerschallengedwithescherichiacoli
_version_ 1721488724351516672