Comparison of EuroSCORE and STS risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery

Objective: To compare the feasibility of the EuroSCORE and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scoring systems for predicting the surgical mortality of isolated coronary artery bypass surgery patients. Methods: The risk scoring of 148 patients who were operated on between April 2005 and March...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehmet Salih Aydın, Mustafa Göz, Abdussemet Hazar, Aydemir Koçarslan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dicle University Medical School 2015-03-01
Series:Dicle Medical Journal
Subjects:
STS
Online Access:http://www.diclemedj.org/upload/sayi/35/Dicle%20Med%20J-02379.pdf
id doaj-16bab0511eb24308980444b219580732
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16bab0511eb24308980444b2195807322020-11-24T23:13:08ZengDicle University Medical SchoolDicle Medical Journal 1300-29451308-98892015-03-01421556010.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.01.0530Comparison of EuroSCORE and STS risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgeryMehmet Salih Aydın0Mustafa Göz1Abdussemet Hazar2Aydemir Koçarslan3Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kalp Damar Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, TürkiyeHarran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kalp Damar Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, TürkiyeHarran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kalp Damar Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, TürkiyeHarran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kalp Damar Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa, TürkiyeObjective: To compare the feasibility of the EuroSCORE and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scoring systems for predicting the surgical mortality of isolated coronary artery bypass surgery patients. Methods: The risk scoring of 148 patients who were operated on between April 2005 and March 2009 was performed prospectively according to the EuroSCORE and STS risk scoring systems. The predicted and observed mortality rates according to each scoring system were compared. Results: Hospital mortality was 13.2% (24 patients). The predicted mortality rate according to EuroSCORE was 4.71±4.9%, whereas it was 1.17±1.35% for STS. There were no significant differences between predicted and observed mortality rates according to either scoring system. The area under the ROC curve was 0.712 for EuroSCORE and was 0.727 for STS. Conclusion: Both scoring systems were efficient for predicting mortality rates for our study. It is an advantage of STS that it also gives valuable information about morbidity but for our not found satisfactory. In conclusion new risks scores for our country’s population are needed. http://www.diclemedj.org/upload/sayi/35/Dicle%20Med%20J-02379.pdfAorta-coronary bypasssurgerySTSEuroSCORE
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mehmet Salih Aydın
Mustafa Göz
Abdussemet Hazar
Aydemir Koçarslan
spellingShingle Mehmet Salih Aydın
Mustafa Göz
Abdussemet Hazar
Aydemir Koçarslan
Comparison of EuroSCORE and STS risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery
Dicle Medical Journal
Aorta-coronary bypass
surgery
STS
EuroSCORE
author_facet Mehmet Salih Aydın
Mustafa Göz
Abdussemet Hazar
Aydemir Koçarslan
author_sort Mehmet Salih Aydın
title Comparison of EuroSCORE and STS risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery
title_short Comparison of EuroSCORE and STS risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery
title_full Comparison of EuroSCORE and STS risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of EuroSCORE and STS risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of EuroSCORE and STS risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery
title_sort comparison of euroscore and sts risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery
publisher Dicle University Medical School
series Dicle Medical Journal
issn 1300-2945
1308-9889
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Objective: To compare the feasibility of the EuroSCORE and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scoring systems for predicting the surgical mortality of isolated coronary artery bypass surgery patients. Methods: The risk scoring of 148 patients who were operated on between April 2005 and March 2009 was performed prospectively according to the EuroSCORE and STS risk scoring systems. The predicted and observed mortality rates according to each scoring system were compared. Results: Hospital mortality was 13.2% (24 patients). The predicted mortality rate according to EuroSCORE was 4.71±4.9%, whereas it was 1.17±1.35% for STS. There were no significant differences between predicted and observed mortality rates according to either scoring system. The area under the ROC curve was 0.712 for EuroSCORE and was 0.727 for STS. Conclusion: Both scoring systems were efficient for predicting mortality rates for our study. It is an advantage of STS that it also gives valuable information about morbidity but for our not found satisfactory. In conclusion new risks scores for our country’s population are needed.
topic Aorta-coronary bypass
surgery
STS
EuroSCORE
url http://www.diclemedj.org/upload/sayi/35/Dicle%20Med%20J-02379.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmetsalihaydın comparisonofeuroscoreandstsriskparametersinpatientsperformedwithcoronaryarterybypasssurgery
AT mustafagoz comparisonofeuroscoreandstsriskparametersinpatientsperformedwithcoronaryarterybypasssurgery
AT abdussemethazar comparisonofeuroscoreandstsriskparametersinpatientsperformedwithcoronaryarterybypasssurgery
AT aydemirkocarslan comparisonofeuroscoreandstsriskparametersinpatientsperformedwithcoronaryarterybypasssurgery
_version_ 1725599149176389632