The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China

To shed light on whether and how firms changed compensation practices in response to a shift in the environment in which they operated, we examine whether there is contagion effect of executive compensation regulation on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the emerging market of China. Specifically, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Shao, Haiyan Zhou, Na Gong, Junzi Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738257/full
id doaj-16b87f68f07f4cc2bb4cf3561018d7b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16b87f68f07f4cc2bb4cf3561018d7b32021-10-01T05:56:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-10-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.738257738257The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From ChinaJun Shao0Haiyan Zhou1Na Gong2Junzi Zhang3Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, ChinaThe University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, TX, United StatesShanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, ChinaCity University of London, London, United KingdomTo shed light on whether and how firms changed compensation practices in response to a shift in the environment in which they operated, we examine whether there is contagion effect of executive compensation regulation on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the emerging market of China. Specifically, we investigate whether firms not directly affected by the changing regulatory environment nonetheless changed executive compensation in response to the actions of the directly affected firms, which is called contagion effect. We further examine the specific contagion mechanisms and the economic consequences of regulation on compensation. We find that the regulation has a significant effect on compensation gap in central SOEs and a contagion effect on local SOEs but not for non-SOEs. Within SOEs, there is an intra-industry contagion effect of compensation regulation but not an intra-region effect. Further, central SOEs and local SOEs experience reduced firm performance after the compensation regulations, but not the non-SOEs; indicating that the compensation regulation does not have favorable economic consequences for both the directly affected central SOEs and the indirectly affected local SOEs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738257/fullcontagion effectcontagion mechanismcompensation regulationeconomic consequencemerging marketcompensation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jun Shao
Haiyan Zhou
Na Gong
Junzi Zhang
spellingShingle Jun Shao
Haiyan Zhou
Na Gong
Junzi Zhang
The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China
Frontiers in Psychology
contagion effect
contagion mechanism
compensation regulation
economic consequence
merging market
compensation
author_facet Jun Shao
Haiyan Zhou
Na Gong
Junzi Zhang
author_sort Jun Shao
title The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China
title_short The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China
title_full The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China
title_fullStr The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China
title_full_unstemmed The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China
title_sort contagion effect of compensation regulation: evidence from china
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-10-01
description To shed light on whether and how firms changed compensation practices in response to a shift in the environment in which they operated, we examine whether there is contagion effect of executive compensation regulation on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the emerging market of China. Specifically, we investigate whether firms not directly affected by the changing regulatory environment nonetheless changed executive compensation in response to the actions of the directly affected firms, which is called contagion effect. We further examine the specific contagion mechanisms and the economic consequences of regulation on compensation. We find that the regulation has a significant effect on compensation gap in central SOEs and a contagion effect on local SOEs but not for non-SOEs. Within SOEs, there is an intra-industry contagion effect of compensation regulation but not an intra-region effect. Further, central SOEs and local SOEs experience reduced firm performance after the compensation regulations, but not the non-SOEs; indicating that the compensation regulation does not have favorable economic consequences for both the directly affected central SOEs and the indirectly affected local SOEs.
topic contagion effect
contagion mechanism
compensation regulation
economic consequence
merging market
compensation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738257/full
work_keys_str_mv AT junshao thecontagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina
AT haiyanzhou thecontagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina
AT nagong thecontagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina
AT junzizhang thecontagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina
AT junshao contagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina
AT haiyanzhou contagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina
AT nagong contagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina
AT junzizhang contagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina
_version_ 1716862068346322944