The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China
To shed light on whether and how firms changed compensation practices in response to a shift in the environment in which they operated, we examine whether there is contagion effect of executive compensation regulation on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the emerging market of China. Specifically, w...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738257/full |
id |
doaj-16b87f68f07f4cc2bb4cf3561018d7b3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-16b87f68f07f4cc2bb4cf3561018d7b32021-10-01T05:56:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-10-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.738257738257The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From ChinaJun Shao0Haiyan Zhou1Na Gong2Junzi Zhang3Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, ChinaThe University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, TX, United StatesShanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, ChinaCity University of London, London, United KingdomTo shed light on whether and how firms changed compensation practices in response to a shift in the environment in which they operated, we examine whether there is contagion effect of executive compensation regulation on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the emerging market of China. Specifically, we investigate whether firms not directly affected by the changing regulatory environment nonetheless changed executive compensation in response to the actions of the directly affected firms, which is called contagion effect. We further examine the specific contagion mechanisms and the economic consequences of regulation on compensation. We find that the regulation has a significant effect on compensation gap in central SOEs and a contagion effect on local SOEs but not for non-SOEs. Within SOEs, there is an intra-industry contagion effect of compensation regulation but not an intra-region effect. Further, central SOEs and local SOEs experience reduced firm performance after the compensation regulations, but not the non-SOEs; indicating that the compensation regulation does not have favorable economic consequences for both the directly affected central SOEs and the indirectly affected local SOEs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738257/fullcontagion effectcontagion mechanismcompensation regulationeconomic consequencemerging marketcompensation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jun Shao Haiyan Zhou Na Gong Junzi Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Jun Shao Haiyan Zhou Na Gong Junzi Zhang The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China Frontiers in Psychology contagion effect contagion mechanism compensation regulation economic consequence merging market compensation |
author_facet |
Jun Shao Haiyan Zhou Na Gong Junzi Zhang |
author_sort |
Jun Shao |
title |
The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China |
title_short |
The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China |
title_full |
The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China |
title_fullStr |
The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Contagion Effect of Compensation Regulation: Evidence From China |
title_sort |
contagion effect of compensation regulation: evidence from china |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2021-10-01 |
description |
To shed light on whether and how firms changed compensation practices in response to a shift in the environment in which they operated, we examine whether there is contagion effect of executive compensation regulation on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the emerging market of China. Specifically, we investigate whether firms not directly affected by the changing regulatory environment nonetheless changed executive compensation in response to the actions of the directly affected firms, which is called contagion effect. We further examine the specific contagion mechanisms and the economic consequences of regulation on compensation. We find that the regulation has a significant effect on compensation gap in central SOEs and a contagion effect on local SOEs but not for non-SOEs. Within SOEs, there is an intra-industry contagion effect of compensation regulation but not an intra-region effect. Further, central SOEs and local SOEs experience reduced firm performance after the compensation regulations, but not the non-SOEs; indicating that the compensation regulation does not have favorable economic consequences for both the directly affected central SOEs and the indirectly affected local SOEs. |
topic |
contagion effect contagion mechanism compensation regulation economic consequence merging market compensation |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738257/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT junshao thecontagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina AT haiyanzhou thecontagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina AT nagong thecontagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina AT junzizhang thecontagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina AT junshao contagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina AT haiyanzhou contagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina AT nagong contagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina AT junzizhang contagioneffectofcompensationregulationevidencefromchina |
_version_ |
1716862068346322944 |