Leading over the Long Run: Rhetorical Consequentialism and Rhetorical Leadership

Because the goals leaders and organizations seek typically require persistent engagement over time, rhetorical leadership has as a central concern the long-term consequences of the leader’s rhetorical choices. Although traditional rhetorical theory downplayed this long-term perspective in favor of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clarke Rountree
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Polskie Towarzystwo Retoryczne/ Polish Rhetoric Society 2019-07-01
Series:Res Rhetorica
Online Access:http://resrhetorica.com/index.php/RR/article/view/356
id doaj-16b54584594d46708f06be3b3e740662
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16b54584594d46708f06be3b3e7406622021-03-01T22:00:55ZengPolskie Towarzystwo Retoryczne/ Polish Rhetoric SocietyRes Rhetorica2392-31132019-07-016210.29107/rr2019.2.1Leading over the Long Run: Rhetorical Consequentialism and Rhetorical LeadershipClarke Rountree0UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLEBecause the goals leaders and organizations seek typically require persistent engagement over time, rhetorical leadership has as a central concern the long-term consequences of the leader’s rhetorical choices. Although traditional rhetorical theory downplayed this long-term perspective in favor of the singular rhetorical engagement (such as a speech), rhetorical theorists have begun considering the rhetorical implications of persuasion wrought over the long-run. This essay applies rhetorical consequentialism, a theoretical perspective developed by the author, to explain the orientation and strategies the rhetorical leader must consider in longterm persuasion. Leaders must be concerned about consistency over time to avoid charges of waffl ing, delusion, lying, hypocrisy, and the like if they are to maintain their ethos and that of their organizations. They also should take positive steps to create the symbolic and material conditions for rhetorical success over the long run. The essay describes „constraint avoidance” strategies that limit inconsistencies over time, as well as „stage-setting” strategies that prepare the symbolic and material ground for future rhetorical success. The essay draws examples from American political rhetoric, especially that of Donald Trump, to illuminate these strategies. The essay concludes by considering the challenges and prospects of such strategies.http://resrhetorica.com/index.php/RR/article/view/356
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clarke Rountree
spellingShingle Clarke Rountree
Leading over the Long Run: Rhetorical Consequentialism and Rhetorical Leadership
Res Rhetorica
author_facet Clarke Rountree
author_sort Clarke Rountree
title Leading over the Long Run: Rhetorical Consequentialism and Rhetorical Leadership
title_short Leading over the Long Run: Rhetorical Consequentialism and Rhetorical Leadership
title_full Leading over the Long Run: Rhetorical Consequentialism and Rhetorical Leadership
title_fullStr Leading over the Long Run: Rhetorical Consequentialism and Rhetorical Leadership
title_full_unstemmed Leading over the Long Run: Rhetorical Consequentialism and Rhetorical Leadership
title_sort leading over the long run: rhetorical consequentialism and rhetorical leadership
publisher Polskie Towarzystwo Retoryczne/ Polish Rhetoric Society
series Res Rhetorica
issn 2392-3113
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Because the goals leaders and organizations seek typically require persistent engagement over time, rhetorical leadership has as a central concern the long-term consequences of the leader’s rhetorical choices. Although traditional rhetorical theory downplayed this long-term perspective in favor of the singular rhetorical engagement (such as a speech), rhetorical theorists have begun considering the rhetorical implications of persuasion wrought over the long-run. This essay applies rhetorical consequentialism, a theoretical perspective developed by the author, to explain the orientation and strategies the rhetorical leader must consider in longterm persuasion. Leaders must be concerned about consistency over time to avoid charges of waffl ing, delusion, lying, hypocrisy, and the like if they are to maintain their ethos and that of their organizations. They also should take positive steps to create the symbolic and material conditions for rhetorical success over the long run. The essay describes „constraint avoidance” strategies that limit inconsistencies over time, as well as „stage-setting” strategies that prepare the symbolic and material ground for future rhetorical success. The essay draws examples from American political rhetoric, especially that of Donald Trump, to illuminate these strategies. The essay concludes by considering the challenges and prospects of such strategies.
url http://resrhetorica.com/index.php/RR/article/view/356
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkerountree leadingoverthelongrunrhetoricalconsequentialismandrhetoricalleadership
_version_ 1724245867141005312