Approximating Catalyst Effectiveness Factors with Reaction Rate Profiles

A novel approximate solution for catalyst effectiveness factors is presented. It is based on carefully selected approximate reaction rate profiles, instead of typical assumption of composition profiles inside the catalyst. This formulation allows analytical solution of the approximate model, leading...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ville Alopaeus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Catalysts
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/9/3/255
id doaj-16b2e3de13c0488e9e4f08d31c55f36c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16b2e3de13c0488e9e4f08d31c55f36c2020-11-24T21:41:35ZengMDPI AGCatalysts2073-43442019-03-019325510.3390/catal9030255catal9030255Approximating Catalyst Effectiveness Factors with Reaction Rate ProfilesVille Alopaeus0Department of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, PO Box 11000, FI-00076 AALTO, FinlandA novel approximate solution for catalyst effectiveness factors is presented. It is based on carefully selected approximate reaction rate profiles, instead of typical assumption of composition profiles inside the catalyst. This formulation allows analytical solution of the approximate model, leading to a very simple iterative solution for effectiveness factor for general nonlinear reaction stoichiometry and arbitrary catalyst particle shape. The same model can be used with all practical Thiele modulus values, including multicomponent systems with inert compounds. Furthermore, the correct formulation of the underlying physical model equation is discussed. It is shown that an incorrect but often-used model formulation where convective mass transfer has been neglected may lead to much higher errors than the present approximation. Even with a correctly formulated physical model, rigorous discretization of the catalyst particle volume may have unexpectedly high numerical errors, even exceeding those with the present approximate solution. The proposed approximate solution was tested with a number of examples. The first was an equimolar reaction with first order kinetics, for which analytical solutions are available for the standard catalyst particle geometries (slab, long cylinder, and sphere). Then, the method was tested with a second order reaction in three cases: 1) with one pure reactant, 2) with inert present, and 3) with two reactants and non-stoichiometric surface concentrations. Finally, the method was tested with an industrially relevant catalytic toluene hydrogenation including Maxwell-Stefan formulation for the diffusion fluxes. In all the tested systems, the results were practically identical when compared to the analytical solutions or rigorous finite volume solution of the same problem.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/9/3/255reactive systemseffectiveness factordiffusionconvectioncatalystdiscretization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ville Alopaeus
spellingShingle Ville Alopaeus
Approximating Catalyst Effectiveness Factors with Reaction Rate Profiles
Catalysts
reactive systems
effectiveness factor
diffusion
convection
catalyst
discretization
author_facet Ville Alopaeus
author_sort Ville Alopaeus
title Approximating Catalyst Effectiveness Factors with Reaction Rate Profiles
title_short Approximating Catalyst Effectiveness Factors with Reaction Rate Profiles
title_full Approximating Catalyst Effectiveness Factors with Reaction Rate Profiles
title_fullStr Approximating Catalyst Effectiveness Factors with Reaction Rate Profiles
title_full_unstemmed Approximating Catalyst Effectiveness Factors with Reaction Rate Profiles
title_sort approximating catalyst effectiveness factors with reaction rate profiles
publisher MDPI AG
series Catalysts
issn 2073-4344
publishDate 2019-03-01
description A novel approximate solution for catalyst effectiveness factors is presented. It is based on carefully selected approximate reaction rate profiles, instead of typical assumption of composition profiles inside the catalyst. This formulation allows analytical solution of the approximate model, leading to a very simple iterative solution for effectiveness factor for general nonlinear reaction stoichiometry and arbitrary catalyst particle shape. The same model can be used with all practical Thiele modulus values, including multicomponent systems with inert compounds. Furthermore, the correct formulation of the underlying physical model equation is discussed. It is shown that an incorrect but often-used model formulation where convective mass transfer has been neglected may lead to much higher errors than the present approximation. Even with a correctly formulated physical model, rigorous discretization of the catalyst particle volume may have unexpectedly high numerical errors, even exceeding those with the present approximate solution. The proposed approximate solution was tested with a number of examples. The first was an equimolar reaction with first order kinetics, for which analytical solutions are available for the standard catalyst particle geometries (slab, long cylinder, and sphere). Then, the method was tested with a second order reaction in three cases: 1) with one pure reactant, 2) with inert present, and 3) with two reactants and non-stoichiometric surface concentrations. Finally, the method was tested with an industrially relevant catalytic toluene hydrogenation including Maxwell-Stefan formulation for the diffusion fluxes. In all the tested systems, the results were practically identical when compared to the analytical solutions or rigorous finite volume solution of the same problem.
topic reactive systems
effectiveness factor
diffusion
convection
catalyst
discretization
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/9/3/255
work_keys_str_mv AT villealopaeus approximatingcatalysteffectivenessfactorswithreactionrateprofiles
_version_ 1725921230274428928