The Place of Human Dignity in Environmental Adjudication

Abstract A number of scholars have argued that addressing the significant environmental problems we face today is not merely a matter of finding technical or technological solutions, it also requires that we interrogate our assumptions about the nature of our own humanness and come to terms with wha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dina Lupin Townsend
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) 2016-01-01
Series:Oslo Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2016/01/the_place_of_human_dignity_in_environmental_adjudication
id doaj-16acf3d18c8e4e9d818774920c0eccf2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16acf3d18c8e4e9d818774920c0eccf22020-11-25T03:10:11ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992016-01-013275010.5617/oslaw394618948693The Place of Human Dignity in Environmental AdjudicationDina Lupin TownsendAbstract A number of scholars have argued that addressing the significant environmental problems we face today is not merely a matter of finding technical or technological solutions, it also requires that we interrogate our assumptions about the nature of our own humanness and come to terms with what this means for how we behave towards nature. This paper argues that human rights courts engage in questions of human nature and value through their use of the concept of ‘human dignity’ and, as a result, it is a concept that may have an important role to play in human rights cases of an environmental nature. Historically, however, dignity is a concept concerned with the superiority of humanity to the rest of nature, and one thought to be anthropocentric and antithetical to environmental concerns. This paper considers whether human dignity might nevertheless have a beneficial role to play in environmental adjudication by considering its role in legal adjudication from a pragmatic perspective. This paper considers an approach to dignity proposed by Jeff Malpas – one that sees humans as embedded in and constituted by place – and examines whether this approach might impact on the course of judicial reasoning in environmental cases.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2016/01/the_place_of_human_dignity_in_environmental_adjudicationHuman dignityplaceenvironmentjudicial reasoningHumandignityjudicialreasoning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dina Lupin Townsend
spellingShingle Dina Lupin Townsend
The Place of Human Dignity in Environmental Adjudication
Oslo Law Review
Human dignity
place
environment
judicial reasoning
Humandignity
judicialreasoning
author_facet Dina Lupin Townsend
author_sort Dina Lupin Townsend
title The Place of Human Dignity in Environmental Adjudication
title_short The Place of Human Dignity in Environmental Adjudication
title_full The Place of Human Dignity in Environmental Adjudication
title_fullStr The Place of Human Dignity in Environmental Adjudication
title_full_unstemmed The Place of Human Dignity in Environmental Adjudication
title_sort place of human dignity in environmental adjudication
publisher Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
series Oslo Law Review
issn 2387-3299
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Abstract A number of scholars have argued that addressing the significant environmental problems we face today is not merely a matter of finding technical or technological solutions, it also requires that we interrogate our assumptions about the nature of our own humanness and come to terms with what this means for how we behave towards nature. This paper argues that human rights courts engage in questions of human nature and value through their use of the concept of ‘human dignity’ and, as a result, it is a concept that may have an important role to play in human rights cases of an environmental nature. Historically, however, dignity is a concept concerned with the superiority of humanity to the rest of nature, and one thought to be anthropocentric and antithetical to environmental concerns. This paper considers whether human dignity might nevertheless have a beneficial role to play in environmental adjudication by considering its role in legal adjudication from a pragmatic perspective. This paper considers an approach to dignity proposed by Jeff Malpas – one that sees humans as embedded in and constituted by place – and examines whether this approach might impact on the course of judicial reasoning in environmental cases.
topic Human dignity
place
environment
judicial reasoning
Humandignity
judicialreasoning
url https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2016/01/the_place_of_human_dignity_in_environmental_adjudication
work_keys_str_mv AT dinalupintownsend theplaceofhumandignityinenvironmentaladjudication
AT dinalupintownsend placeofhumandignityinenvironmentaladjudication
_version_ 1724660072762572800