Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux

Conservation laws are usually studied in the context of suffcient regularity conditionsimposed on the flux function, usually C<sup>2</sup> and uniform convexity. Some results are proven with theaid of variational methods and a unique minimizer such as Hopf-Lax and Lax-Oleinik. We show th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carey Caginalp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2018-03-01
Series:AIMS Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/Math.2018.1.96/fulltext.html
id doaj-16a88c6f975c405cb382bf04e9fa4311
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16a88c6f975c405cb382bf04e9fa43112020-11-25T02:26:57ZengAIMS PressAIMS Mathematics2473-69882018-03-01319613010.3934/Math.2018.1.96Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex fluxCarey Caginalp0University of Pittsburgh, Mathematics Department, 301 Thackeray Hall, Pittsburgh PA 15260Conservation laws are usually studied in the context of suffcient regularity conditionsimposed on the flux function, usually C<sup>2</sup> and uniform convexity. Some results are proven with theaid of variational methods and a unique minimizer such as Hopf-Lax and Lax-Oleinik. We show thatmany of these classical results can be extended to a flux function that is not necessarily smooth oruniformly or strictly convex. Although uniqueness a.e. of the minimizer will generally no longerhold, by considering the greatest (or supremum, where applicable) of all possible minimizers, wecan successfully extend the results. One specific nonlinear case is that of a piecewise linear fluxfunction, for which we prove existence and uniqueness results. We also approximate it by a smoothed,superlinearized version parameterized by <em>ε</em> and consider the characterization of the minimizers for thesmooth version and limiting behavior as <em>ε</em> ↓ 0 to that of the sharp, polygonal problem. In proving akey result for the solution in terms of the value of the initial condition, we provide a stepping stone toanalyzing the system under stochastic processes, which will be explored further in a future paper.http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/Math.2018.1.96/fulltext.htmlconservation laws| Hopf-Lax-Oleinik| shocks| variational problems in differential equations| minimization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carey Caginalp
spellingShingle Carey Caginalp
Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux
AIMS Mathematics
conservation laws| Hopf-Lax-Oleinik| shocks| variational problems in differential equations| minimization
author_facet Carey Caginalp
author_sort Carey Caginalp
title Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux
title_short Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux
title_full Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux
title_fullStr Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux
title_full_unstemmed Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux
title_sort minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux
publisher AIMS Press
series AIMS Mathematics
issn 2473-6988
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Conservation laws are usually studied in the context of suffcient regularity conditionsimposed on the flux function, usually C<sup>2</sup> and uniform convexity. Some results are proven with theaid of variational methods and a unique minimizer such as Hopf-Lax and Lax-Oleinik. We show thatmany of these classical results can be extended to a flux function that is not necessarily smooth oruniformly or strictly convex. Although uniqueness a.e. of the minimizer will generally no longerhold, by considering the greatest (or supremum, where applicable) of all possible minimizers, wecan successfully extend the results. One specific nonlinear case is that of a piecewise linear fluxfunction, for which we prove existence and uniqueness results. We also approximate it by a smoothed,superlinearized version parameterized by <em>ε</em> and consider the characterization of the minimizers for thesmooth version and limiting behavior as <em>ε</em> ↓ 0 to that of the sharp, polygonal problem. In proving akey result for the solution in terms of the value of the initial condition, we provide a stepping stone toanalyzing the system under stochastic processes, which will be explored further in a future paper.
topic conservation laws| Hopf-Lax-Oleinik| shocks| variational problems in differential equations| minimization
url http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/Math.2018.1.96/fulltext.html
work_keys_str_mv AT careycaginalp minimizationsolutionstoconservationlawswithnonsmoothandnonstrictlyconvexflux
_version_ 1724844983905681408