Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux
Conservation laws are usually studied in the context of suffcient regularity conditionsimposed on the flux function, usually C<sup>2</sup> and uniform convexity. Some results are proven with theaid of variational methods and a unique minimizer such as Hopf-Lax and Lax-Oleinik. We show th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AIMS Press
2018-03-01
|
Series: | AIMS Mathematics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/Math.2018.1.96/fulltext.html |
id |
doaj-16a88c6f975c405cb382bf04e9fa4311 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-16a88c6f975c405cb382bf04e9fa43112020-11-25T02:26:57ZengAIMS PressAIMS Mathematics2473-69882018-03-01319613010.3934/Math.2018.1.96Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex fluxCarey Caginalp0University of Pittsburgh, Mathematics Department, 301 Thackeray Hall, Pittsburgh PA 15260Conservation laws are usually studied in the context of suffcient regularity conditionsimposed on the flux function, usually C<sup>2</sup> and uniform convexity. Some results are proven with theaid of variational methods and a unique minimizer such as Hopf-Lax and Lax-Oleinik. We show thatmany of these classical results can be extended to a flux function that is not necessarily smooth oruniformly or strictly convex. Although uniqueness a.e. of the minimizer will generally no longerhold, by considering the greatest (or supremum, where applicable) of all possible minimizers, wecan successfully extend the results. One specific nonlinear case is that of a piecewise linear fluxfunction, for which we prove existence and uniqueness results. We also approximate it by a smoothed,superlinearized version parameterized by <em>ε</em> and consider the characterization of the minimizers for thesmooth version and limiting behavior as <em>ε</em> ↓ 0 to that of the sharp, polygonal problem. In proving akey result for the solution in terms of the value of the initial condition, we provide a stepping stone toanalyzing the system under stochastic processes, which will be explored further in a future paper.http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/Math.2018.1.96/fulltext.htmlconservation laws| Hopf-Lax-Oleinik| shocks| variational problems in differential equations| minimization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carey Caginalp |
spellingShingle |
Carey Caginalp Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux AIMS Mathematics conservation laws| Hopf-Lax-Oleinik| shocks| variational problems in differential equations| minimization |
author_facet |
Carey Caginalp |
author_sort |
Carey Caginalp |
title |
Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux |
title_short |
Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux |
title_full |
Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux |
title_fullStr |
Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux |
title_sort |
minimization solutions to conservation laws with non-smooth and non-strictly convex flux |
publisher |
AIMS Press |
series |
AIMS Mathematics |
issn |
2473-6988 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Conservation laws are usually studied in the context of suffcient regularity conditionsimposed on the flux function, usually C<sup>2</sup> and uniform convexity. Some results are proven with theaid of variational methods and a unique minimizer such as Hopf-Lax and Lax-Oleinik. We show thatmany of these classical results can be extended to a flux function that is not necessarily smooth oruniformly or strictly convex. Although uniqueness a.e. of the minimizer will generally no longerhold, by considering the greatest (or supremum, where applicable) of all possible minimizers, wecan successfully extend the results. One specific nonlinear case is that of a piecewise linear fluxfunction, for which we prove existence and uniqueness results. We also approximate it by a smoothed,superlinearized version parameterized by <em>ε</em> and consider the characterization of the minimizers for thesmooth version and limiting behavior as <em>ε</em> ↓ 0 to that of the sharp, polygonal problem. In proving akey result for the solution in terms of the value of the initial condition, we provide a stepping stone toanalyzing the system under stochastic processes, which will be explored further in a future paper. |
topic |
conservation laws| Hopf-Lax-Oleinik| shocks| variational problems in differential equations| minimization |
url |
http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/Math.2018.1.96/fulltext.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT careycaginalp minimizationsolutionstoconservationlawswithnonsmoothandnonstrictlyconvexflux |
_version_ |
1724844983905681408 |