Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires

Background: Coated archwires have been introduced to improve esthetics during orthodontic treatment. Theaim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the load–deflection characteristics and force levels of six brands of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires using palatal and gingival d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hind D Abaas, Akram F Al-Huwaizi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad 2015-06-01
Series:Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
Online Access:https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/728
id doaj-16a1d22e02a24a8fb74c1e9db1aac0d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16a1d22e02a24a8fb74c1e9db1aac0d62021-09-02T21:58:17ZengCollege of Dentistry/ University of BaghdadJournal of Baghdad College of Dentistry2311-52702015-06-01272Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwiresHind D AbaasAkram F Al-HuwaiziBackground: Coated archwires have been introduced to improve esthetics during orthodontic treatment. Theaim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the load–deflection characteristics and force levels of six brands of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires using palatal and gingival deflection. Materials and methods: Ten round wires (0.016 inch) and ten rectangular wires (0.019x0.025 inch) were obtained from each of six brands (G&H, Opal, Ortho Technology, Dany, Hubit and Astar Companies). The load-deflection properties of these archwires were evaluated by the modified bending test usinga readymade dental arch model in both palatal and gingival directions at 37°C temperature using a universal material testing machine. Forces generated at maximum loading of 2mm and at unloading of 1.5mm were measured. Results: All the wires showed hysteresis and significant differences in their load deflection curves, but these differences were more evident in round wires than in rectangular wires where G&H wires showed the widest loading- unloading deflection curves. The maximum loading force of round wires in gingival deflection were higher than by palatal deflection. The force decline during unloading (plateau gap) ranged between 18 to 34% for round wires and 17 to 37% for rectangular wires. Conclusion: Coated epoxy wires (G&H, Opal, Astar and Ortho Technology) produced lower forces compared to polymer (Dany) and Teflon (Hubit) coated round and rectangular archwire. https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/728
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hind D Abaas
Akram F Al-Huwaizi
spellingShingle Hind D Abaas
Akram F Al-Huwaizi
Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires
Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
author_facet Hind D Abaas
Akram F Al-Huwaizi
author_sort Hind D Abaas
title Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires
title_short Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires
title_full Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires
title_fullStr Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires
title_full_unstemmed Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires
title_sort load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires
publisher College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad
series Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
issn 2311-5270
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Background: Coated archwires have been introduced to improve esthetics during orthodontic treatment. Theaim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the load–deflection characteristics and force levels of six brands of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires using palatal and gingival deflection. Materials and methods: Ten round wires (0.016 inch) and ten rectangular wires (0.019x0.025 inch) were obtained from each of six brands (G&H, Opal, Ortho Technology, Dany, Hubit and Astar Companies). The load-deflection properties of these archwires were evaluated by the modified bending test usinga readymade dental arch model in both palatal and gingival directions at 37°C temperature using a universal material testing machine. Forces generated at maximum loading of 2mm and at unloading of 1.5mm were measured. Results: All the wires showed hysteresis and significant differences in their load deflection curves, but these differences were more evident in round wires than in rectangular wires where G&H wires showed the widest loading- unloading deflection curves. The maximum loading force of round wires in gingival deflection were higher than by palatal deflection. The force decline during unloading (plateau gap) ranged between 18 to 34% for round wires and 17 to 37% for rectangular wires. Conclusion: Coated epoxy wires (G&H, Opal, Astar and Ortho Technology) produced lower forces compared to polymer (Dany) and Teflon (Hubit) coated round and rectangular archwire.
url https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/728
work_keys_str_mv AT hinddabaas loaddeflectioncharacteristicsandforcelevelsofcoatednickeltitaniumorthodonticarchwires
AT akramfalhuwaizi loaddeflectioncharacteristicsandforcelevelsofcoatednickeltitaniumorthodonticarchwires
_version_ 1717818969840156672