Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg

An unreferenced statement on page 608 is challenged as being incorrect. FSC and PEFC are competitors and issues on the differences between the programs are often arguable. We do agree that a small portion of the statement could have been more clearly stated, but the intent of the statement was essen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas J. Straka, Patricia A. Layton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2010-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
n/a
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/8/2621/
id doaj-1681851968f94ca4a1af37c6f9775b77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1681851968f94ca4a1af37c6f9775b772020-11-25T00:49:46ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502010-08-01282621262510.3390/su2082621Response to Comments of Ben GunnebergThomas J. StrakaPatricia A. LaytonAn unreferenced statement on page 608 is challenged as being incorrect. FSC and PEFC are competitors and issues on the differences between the programs are often arguable. We do agree that a small portion of the statement could have been more clearly stated, but the intent of the statement was essentially correct. The original article contained 80 references and not every sentence could be referenced. We include 18 additional references below to strengthen and clarify our statement. http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/8/2621/n/a
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas J. Straka
Patricia A. Layton
spellingShingle Thomas J. Straka
Patricia A. Layton
Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg
Sustainability
n/a
author_facet Thomas J. Straka
Patricia A. Layton
author_sort Thomas J. Straka
title Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg
title_short Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg
title_full Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg
title_fullStr Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg
title_full_unstemmed Response to Comments of Ben Gunneberg
title_sort response to comments of ben gunneberg
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2010-08-01
description An unreferenced statement on page 608 is challenged as being incorrect. FSC and PEFC are competitors and issues on the differences between the programs are often arguable. We do agree that a small portion of the statement could have been more clearly stated, but the intent of the statement was essentially correct. The original article contained 80 references and not every sentence could be referenced. We include 18 additional references below to strengthen and clarify our statement.
topic n/a
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/8/2621/
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasjstraka responsetocommentsofbengunneberg
AT patriciaalayton responsetocommentsofbengunneberg
_version_ 1725251231735087104