« Quoiqu’il en coûte ? »
The objective of this contribution is to analyze the measures already applied and those still under debate in the face of the socio-economic crisis resulting from the great lockdown. After defining the structural framework - neo-liberal hyper-financialization - within which economic policy choices h...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association Recherche & Régulation
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Revue de la Régulation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/18679 |
id |
doaj-1675dce751954be8906c1d161b08bd20 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1675dce751954be8906c1d161b08bd202021-08-03T00:41:55ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962021-05-012910.4000/regulation.18679« Quoiqu’il en coûte ? »Solène Morvant-RouxJean-Michel ServetAndré TiranThe objective of this contribution is to analyze the measures already applied and those still under debate in the face of the socio-economic crisis resulting from the great lockdown. After defining the structural framework - neo-liberal hyper-financialization - within which economic policy choices have been made and will be implemented, we suggest that solutions generally asserted as breaking with the past are in fact fully dominated/framed by it. Our argument focuses on the flagship measure of public debt. We argue that these instruments of economic policy are unable to question the existing political and economic order, show a limited capacity for transformation and cannot constitute progressive alternatives to a system still dominated by economic and financial orthodoxy.http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/18679great lockdownneoliberalismmonetary creationfinancialized debt |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Solène Morvant-Roux Jean-Michel Servet André Tiran |
spellingShingle |
Solène Morvant-Roux Jean-Michel Servet André Tiran « Quoiqu’il en coûte ? » Revue de la Régulation great lockdown neoliberalism monetary creation financialized debt |
author_facet |
Solène Morvant-Roux Jean-Michel Servet André Tiran |
author_sort |
Solène Morvant-Roux |
title |
« Quoiqu’il en coûte ? » |
title_short |
« Quoiqu’il en coûte ? » |
title_full |
« Quoiqu’il en coûte ? » |
title_fullStr |
« Quoiqu’il en coûte ? » |
title_full_unstemmed |
« Quoiqu’il en coûte ? » |
title_sort |
« quoiqu’il en coûte ? » |
publisher |
Association Recherche & Régulation |
series |
Revue de la Régulation |
issn |
1957-7796 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
The objective of this contribution is to analyze the measures already applied and those still under debate in the face of the socio-economic crisis resulting from the great lockdown. After defining the structural framework - neo-liberal hyper-financialization - within which economic policy choices have been made and will be implemented, we suggest that solutions generally asserted as breaking with the past are in fact fully dominated/framed by it. Our argument focuses on the flagship measure of public debt. We argue that these instruments of economic policy are unable to question the existing political and economic order, show a limited capacity for transformation and cannot constitute progressive alternatives to a system still dominated by economic and financial orthodoxy. |
topic |
great lockdown neoliberalism monetary creation financialized debt |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/18679 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT solenemorvantroux quoiquilencoute AT jeanmichelservet quoiquilencoute AT andretiran quoiquilencoute |
_version_ |
1721224632298635264 |