A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions

Francisco Batel Marques,1,2 Ana Penedones,1,2 Diogo Mendes,1,2 Carlos Alves,1,2 1CHAD – Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research, AIBILI – Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, 2School of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Batel Marques F, Penedones A, Mendes D, Alves C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2016-08-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-review-of-observational-studies-evaluating-costs-of-adver-peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
id doaj-1665f3a59a314a1c9a2576637c673843
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1665f3a59a314a1c9a2576637c6738432020-11-25T00:25:42ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812016-08-01Volume 841342628555A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactionsBatel Marques FPenedones AMendes DAlves CFrancisco Batel Marques,1,2 Ana Penedones,1,2 Diogo Mendes,1,2 Carlos Alves,1,2 1CHAD – Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research, AIBILI – Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, 2School of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Introduction: The growing evidence of the increased frequency and severity of adverse drug events (ADEs), besides the negative impact on patient’s health status, indicates that costs due to ADEs may be steadily rising. Observational studies are an important tool in pharmacovigilance. Despite these studies being more susceptible to bias than experimental designs, they are more competent in assessing ADEs and their associated costs.Objective: To identify and characterize the best available evidence on ADE-associated costs.Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from 1995 to 2015. Observational studies were included. The methodological quality of selected studies was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration tool for experimental and observational studies. Studies were classified according to the setting analyzed in “ambulatory”, “hospital”, or both. Costs were classified as “direct” and “indirect”. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The total incremental cost per patient with ADE was estimated.Results: Twenty-nine (94%) longitudinal observational studies and two (7%) cross-sectional studies were included. Twenty-three (74%) studies were assessed with the highest methodological quality score. The studies were mainly conducted in the US (61%). Twenty (65%) studies evaluated any therapeutic group. Twenty (65%) studies estimated costs of ADEs leading to or prolonging hospitalization. The “direct costs” were evaluated in all studies, whereas only two (7%) also estimated the “indirect costs”. The “direct costs” in ambulatory ranged from €702.21 to €40,273.08, and the in hospital from €943.40 to €7,192.36.Discussion: Methodological heterogeneities were identified among the included studies, such as design, type of ADEs, suspected drugs, and type and structure of costs. Despite such discrepancies, the financial burden associated with ADE costs was found to be high. In the light of the present findings, validated methods to measure ADE-associated costs need future research efforts. Keywords: drug costs, health care costs, drug-related side effects and adverse reactions, reviewhttps://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-review-of-observational-studies-evaluating-costs-of-adver-peer-reviewed-article-CEORDrug CostsHealth Care CostsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsReview
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Batel Marques F
Penedones A
Mendes D
Alves C
spellingShingle Batel Marques F
Penedones A
Mendes D
Alves C
A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Drug Costs
Health Care Costs
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Review
author_facet Batel Marques F
Penedones A
Mendes D
Alves C
author_sort Batel Marques F
title A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions
title_short A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions
title_full A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions
title_fullStr A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions
title_sort systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions
publisher Dove Medical Press
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
issn 1178-6981
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Francisco Batel Marques,1,2 Ana Penedones,1,2 Diogo Mendes,1,2 Carlos Alves,1,2 1CHAD – Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research, AIBILI – Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, 2School of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Introduction: The growing evidence of the increased frequency and severity of adverse drug events (ADEs), besides the negative impact on patient’s health status, indicates that costs due to ADEs may be steadily rising. Observational studies are an important tool in pharmacovigilance. Despite these studies being more susceptible to bias than experimental designs, they are more competent in assessing ADEs and their associated costs.Objective: To identify and characterize the best available evidence on ADE-associated costs.Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from 1995 to 2015. Observational studies were included. The methodological quality of selected studies was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration tool for experimental and observational studies. Studies were classified according to the setting analyzed in “ambulatory”, “hospital”, or both. Costs were classified as “direct” and “indirect”. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The total incremental cost per patient with ADE was estimated.Results: Twenty-nine (94%) longitudinal observational studies and two (7%) cross-sectional studies were included. Twenty-three (74%) studies were assessed with the highest methodological quality score. The studies were mainly conducted in the US (61%). Twenty (65%) studies evaluated any therapeutic group. Twenty (65%) studies estimated costs of ADEs leading to or prolonging hospitalization. The “direct costs” were evaluated in all studies, whereas only two (7%) also estimated the “indirect costs”. The “direct costs” in ambulatory ranged from €702.21 to €40,273.08, and the in hospital from €943.40 to €7,192.36.Discussion: Methodological heterogeneities were identified among the included studies, such as design, type of ADEs, suspected drugs, and type and structure of costs. Despite such discrepancies, the financial burden associated with ADE costs was found to be high. In the light of the present findings, validated methods to measure ADE-associated costs need future research efforts. Keywords: drug costs, health care costs, drug-related side effects and adverse reactions, review
topic Drug Costs
Health Care Costs
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Review
url https://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-review-of-observational-studies-evaluating-costs-of-adver-peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
work_keys_str_mv AT batelmarquesf asystematicreviewofobservationalstudiesevaluatingcostsofadversedrugreactions
AT penedonesa asystematicreviewofobservationalstudiesevaluatingcostsofadversedrugreactions
AT mendesd asystematicreviewofobservationalstudiesevaluatingcostsofadversedrugreactions
AT alvesc asystematicreviewofobservationalstudiesevaluatingcostsofadversedrugreactions
AT batelmarquesf systematicreviewofobservationalstudiesevaluatingcostsofadversedrugreactions
AT penedonesa systematicreviewofobservationalstudiesevaluatingcostsofadversedrugreactions
AT mendesd systematicreviewofobservationalstudiesevaluatingcostsofadversedrugreactions
AT alvesc systematicreviewofobservationalstudiesevaluatingcostsofadversedrugreactions
_version_ 1725347334083051520