Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis

On November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on Novem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eyasu H. Teshale, John A. Painter, Gregory A. Burr, Paul S. Mead, Scott V. Wright, Larry F. Cseh, Ronald Zabrocki, Rick Collins, Kathy A. Kelley, James L. Hadler, David L. Swerdlow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002-10-01
Series:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/8/10/02-0398_article
id doaj-166467b97a4f4918a19f86e239133992
record_format Article
spelling doaj-166467b97a4f4918a19f86e2391339922020-11-24T22:16:01ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592002-10-018101083108710.3201/eid0810.020398Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracisEyasu H. TeshaleJohn A. PainterGregory A. BurrPaul S. MeadScott V. WrightLarry F. CsehRonald ZabrockiRick CollinsKathy A. KelleyJames L. HadlerDavid L. SwerdlowOn November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on November 19, the center was sampled again on November 21 and 25 by using dry and wet swabs. All samples were again negative for B. anthracis. On November 28, guided by information from epidemiologic investigation, we sampled the site extensively with wet wipes and surface vacuum sock samples (using HEPA vacuum). Of 212 samples, 6 (3%) were positive, including one from a highly contaminated sorter. Subsequently B. anthracis was also detected in mail-sorting bins used for the patient’s carrier route. These results suggest cross-contaminated mail as a possible source of anthrax for the inhalational anthrax patient in Connecticut. In future such investigations, extensive sampling guided by epidemiologic data is imperative.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/8/10/02-0398_articleanthraxBacillus anthracisenvironmental samplingHEPA vacuum sockpostal facilitysurface sampling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eyasu H. Teshale
John A. Painter
Gregory A. Burr
Paul S. Mead
Scott V. Wright
Larry F. Cseh
Ronald Zabrocki
Rick Collins
Kathy A. Kelley
James L. Hadler
David L. Swerdlow
spellingShingle Eyasu H. Teshale
John A. Painter
Gregory A. Burr
Paul S. Mead
Scott V. Wright
Larry F. Cseh
Ronald Zabrocki
Rick Collins
Kathy A. Kelley
James L. Hadler
David L. Swerdlow
Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis
Emerging Infectious Diseases
anthrax
Bacillus anthracis
environmental sampling
HEPA vacuum sock
postal facility
surface sampling
author_facet Eyasu H. Teshale
John A. Painter
Gregory A. Burr
Paul S. Mead
Scott V. Wright
Larry F. Cseh
Ronald Zabrocki
Rick Collins
Kathy A. Kelley
James L. Hadler
David L. Swerdlow
author_sort Eyasu H. Teshale
title Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis
title_short Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis
title_full Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis
title_fullStr Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis
title_sort environmental sampling for spores of bacillus anthracis
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
series Emerging Infectious Diseases
issn 1080-6040
1080-6059
publishDate 2002-10-01
description On November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on November 19, the center was sampled again on November 21 and 25 by using dry and wet swabs. All samples were again negative for B. anthracis. On November 28, guided by information from epidemiologic investigation, we sampled the site extensively with wet wipes and surface vacuum sock samples (using HEPA vacuum). Of 212 samples, 6 (3%) were positive, including one from a highly contaminated sorter. Subsequently B. anthracis was also detected in mail-sorting bins used for the patient’s carrier route. These results suggest cross-contaminated mail as a possible source of anthrax for the inhalational anthrax patient in Connecticut. In future such investigations, extensive sampling guided by epidemiologic data is imperative.
topic anthrax
Bacillus anthracis
environmental sampling
HEPA vacuum sock
postal facility
surface sampling
url https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/8/10/02-0398_article
work_keys_str_mv AT eyasuhteshale environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT johnapainter environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT gregoryaburr environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT paulsmead environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT scottvwright environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT larryfcseh environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT ronaldzabrocki environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT rickcollins environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT kathyakelley environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT jameslhadler environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
AT davidlswerdlow environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis
_version_ 1725791772668329984