Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis
On November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on Novem...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2002-10-01
|
Series: | Emerging Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/8/10/02-0398_article |
id |
doaj-166467b97a4f4918a19f86e239133992 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-166467b97a4f4918a19f86e2391339922020-11-24T22:16:01ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592002-10-018101083108710.3201/eid0810.020398Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracisEyasu H. TeshaleJohn A. PainterGregory A. BurrPaul S. MeadScott V. WrightLarry F. CsehRonald ZabrockiRick CollinsKathy A. KelleyJames L. HadlerDavid L. SwerdlowOn November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on November 19, the center was sampled again on November 21 and 25 by using dry and wet swabs. All samples were again negative for B. anthracis. On November 28, guided by information from epidemiologic investigation, we sampled the site extensively with wet wipes and surface vacuum sock samples (using HEPA vacuum). Of 212 samples, 6 (3%) were positive, including one from a highly contaminated sorter. Subsequently B. anthracis was also detected in mail-sorting bins used for the patient’s carrier route. These results suggest cross-contaminated mail as a possible source of anthrax for the inhalational anthrax patient in Connecticut. In future such investigations, extensive sampling guided by epidemiologic data is imperative.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/8/10/02-0398_articleanthraxBacillus anthracisenvironmental samplingHEPA vacuum sockpostal facilitysurface sampling |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eyasu H. Teshale John A. Painter Gregory A. Burr Paul S. Mead Scott V. Wright Larry F. Cseh Ronald Zabrocki Rick Collins Kathy A. Kelley James L. Hadler David L. Swerdlow |
spellingShingle |
Eyasu H. Teshale John A. Painter Gregory A. Burr Paul S. Mead Scott V. Wright Larry F. Cseh Ronald Zabrocki Rick Collins Kathy A. Kelley James L. Hadler David L. Swerdlow Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis Emerging Infectious Diseases anthrax Bacillus anthracis environmental sampling HEPA vacuum sock postal facility surface sampling |
author_facet |
Eyasu H. Teshale John A. Painter Gregory A. Burr Paul S. Mead Scott V. Wright Larry F. Cseh Ronald Zabrocki Rick Collins Kathy A. Kelley James L. Hadler David L. Swerdlow |
author_sort |
Eyasu H. Teshale |
title |
Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_short |
Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_full |
Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_fullStr |
Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_sort |
environmental sampling for spores of bacillus anthracis |
publisher |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
series |
Emerging Infectious Diseases |
issn |
1080-6040 1080-6059 |
publishDate |
2002-10-01 |
description |
On November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on November 19, the center was sampled again on November 21 and 25 by using dry and wet swabs. All samples were again negative for B. anthracis. On November 28, guided by information from epidemiologic investigation, we sampled the site extensively with wet wipes and surface vacuum sock samples (using HEPA vacuum). Of 212 samples, 6 (3%) were positive, including one from a highly contaminated sorter. Subsequently B. anthracis was also detected in mail-sorting bins used for the patient’s carrier route. These results suggest cross-contaminated mail as a possible source of anthrax for the inhalational anthrax patient in Connecticut. In future such investigations, extensive sampling guided by epidemiologic data is imperative. |
topic |
anthrax Bacillus anthracis environmental sampling HEPA vacuum sock postal facility surface sampling |
url |
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/8/10/02-0398_article |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eyasuhteshale environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT johnapainter environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT gregoryaburr environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT paulsmead environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT scottvwright environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT larryfcseh environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT ronaldzabrocki environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT rickcollins environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT kathyakelley environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT jameslhadler environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT davidlswerdlow environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis |
_version_ |
1725791772668329984 |