Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Spatial Effects

The author specifies an empirical framework of neoclassical growth model in order to examine impact of transport infrastructure on economic growth in Russian regions during period of 2000-2013. Two different effects of infrastructure are considered. First, infrastructure is viewed as part of region...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2015-09-01
Series:Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
Subjects:
Online Access:http://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/3_2015/SE.2015.3.057-073.Isaev.pdf
id doaj-16572cfccc7844b1ae584b165af4181d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16572cfccc7844b1ae584b165af4181d2020-11-25T01:35:47ZrusEconomic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesProstranstvennaâ Èkonomika1815-98342587-59572015-09-013577310.14530/se.2015.3.057-073Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Spatial EffectsArtyom Gennadyevich Isaev0Economic Research Institute FEB RAS The author specifies an empirical framework of neoclassical growth model in order to examine impact of transport infrastructure on economic growth in Russian regions during period of 2000-2013. Two different effects of infrastructure are considered. First, infrastructure is viewed as part of region’s own production function. Second, infrastructure generates spillover effect on adjacent regions’ economic performance which can be negative or positive. Results imply that road infrastructure has a positive influence on regional growth, but sign of railroad infrastructure coefficient depends on whether or not congestion effect is considered. Negative spillover effect is shown to exist in the case of road infrastructure. This apparently means that rapid road infrastructure development in some regions moves mobile factors of production away from adjacent regions retarding their economic development. The spillover effect of railroad infrastructure is significant and negative again only if congestion effect is considered. The results of estimation for the Far East and Baikal Regions separately demonstrate no significant effect of both types of infrastructure for economic performance and negative spillover effect of road infrastructurehttp://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/3_2015/SE.2015.3.057-073.Isaev.pdfregional growthtransport infrastructurespatial externalitiesRussian regionsgeneralized method of moments
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev
spellingShingle Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev
Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Spatial Effects
Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
regional growth
transport infrastructure
spatial externalities
Russian regions
generalized method of moments
author_facet Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev
author_sort Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev
title Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Spatial Effects
title_short Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Spatial Effects
title_full Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Spatial Effects
title_fullStr Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Spatial Effects
title_full_unstemmed Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Spatial Effects
title_sort transport infrastructure and economic growth: spatial effects
publisher Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
issn 1815-9834
2587-5957
publishDate 2015-09-01
description The author specifies an empirical framework of neoclassical growth model in order to examine impact of transport infrastructure on economic growth in Russian regions during period of 2000-2013. Two different effects of infrastructure are considered. First, infrastructure is viewed as part of region’s own production function. Second, infrastructure generates spillover effect on adjacent regions’ economic performance which can be negative or positive. Results imply that road infrastructure has a positive influence on regional growth, but sign of railroad infrastructure coefficient depends on whether or not congestion effect is considered. Negative spillover effect is shown to exist in the case of road infrastructure. This apparently means that rapid road infrastructure development in some regions moves mobile factors of production away from adjacent regions retarding their economic development. The spillover effect of railroad infrastructure is significant and negative again only if congestion effect is considered. The results of estimation for the Far East and Baikal Regions separately demonstrate no significant effect of both types of infrastructure for economic performance and negative spillover effect of road infrastructure
topic regional growth
transport infrastructure
spatial externalities
Russian regions
generalized method of moments
url http://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/3_2015/SE.2015.3.057-073.Isaev.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT artyomgennadyevichisaev transportinfrastructureandeconomicgrowthspatialeffects
_version_ 1725066330011336704