Defensive Jurisprudence and Productivity Goals: Jabuticaba Consumerist

This paper analyzes the application of so-called procedural defensive jurisprudence that values exacerbated rationalization of the judiciary activities, preventing the processing of judicial review in the higher courts, and its consequences in consumeristas indemnity processes. It analyzes the press...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miguel Luiz Barros Barreto de Oliveira, Thiago Rodrigues Pereira
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) 2016-10-01
Series:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/562
Description
Summary:This paper analyzes the application of so-called procedural defensive jurisprudence that values exacerbated rationalization of the judiciary activities, preventing the processing of judicial review in the higher courts, and its consequences in consumeristas indemnity processes. It analyzes the pressure to which judges are subjected, especially because of the need to comply with productivity goals. The construction work suggests the misconception of these imposed judicial policies to decrease the procedural stock since that attack the problem on screen superficially and do not solve the basic question.
ISSN:2525-9822
2525-9822