Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences
Introduction: A Danish integrated mental health care and vocational intervention was developed to support the return-to-work process for people with common mental disorders. Shared decision making was a core element of the intervention to ensure a person-centred approach. The study aim is to describ...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2020-11-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Integrated Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ijic.org/articles/5509 |
id |
doaj-165073fe755448c1b9288dccff3fe0c9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-165073fe755448c1b9288dccff3fe0c92020-12-10T13:35:13ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562020-11-0120410.5334/ijic.55094878Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and ExperiencesKathrine Hoffmann Pii0Lisbeth Hybholt1Rie Mandrup Poulsen2Lene Falgaard Eplov3Mathias Meijer4University College Copenhagen, Institute of Nursing and Nutrition, CopenhagenCentre for Relationships and De-escalation, Mental Health Services Region Zealand, Slagelse; Mental Health Services East, Psychiatry Region Zealand, RoskildeCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health – CORE, Rehabilitation, Recovery and Shared Care, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services in Capital Region of Denmark, HellerupCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health – CORE, Rehabilitation, Recovery and Shared Care, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services in Capital Region of Denmark, HellerupUniversity College Copenhagen, Institute of Nursing and Nutrition, CopenhagenIntroduction: A Danish integrated mental health care and vocational intervention was developed to support the return-to-work process for people with common mental disorders. Shared decision making was a core element of the intervention to ensure a person-centred approach. The study aim is to describe how shared decision making was practiced and experienced and to discuss its potential in this integrated care context. Theory and methods: Shared decision making practice and experience was studied in participant observation (n = 20), interviews (n = 12), focus groups interviews (n = 2), and shared plan documents (n = 12). Research methods and analyses were guided by theoretically defined ideals of shared decision making. Results: Shared decision making constituted a general value rather than a structured method in practice. Clients experienced a more person-centred collaboration with professionals, compared to the regular vocational system. Contextual factors regarding vocational legislation and the intervention design influenced the decision latitude. Conclusion: Shared decision making has the potential to support a person-centred approach in integrated services. However, we recommend clarifying decisions applicable for shared decision making, to ensure thorough training, develop and test decision aids, and ensure supportive organisational conditions for shared decision making in interprofessional collaboration.https://www.ijic.org/articles/5509shared decision makingintegrated caremental health carevocational rehabilitationcommon mental disorders |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kathrine Hoffmann Pii Lisbeth Hybholt Rie Mandrup Poulsen Lene Falgaard Eplov Mathias Meijer |
spellingShingle |
Kathrine Hoffmann Pii Lisbeth Hybholt Rie Mandrup Poulsen Lene Falgaard Eplov Mathias Meijer Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences International Journal of Integrated Care shared decision making integrated care mental health care vocational rehabilitation common mental disorders |
author_facet |
Kathrine Hoffmann Pii Lisbeth Hybholt Rie Mandrup Poulsen Lene Falgaard Eplov Mathias Meijer |
author_sort |
Kathrine Hoffmann Pii |
title |
Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences |
title_short |
Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences |
title_full |
Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences |
title_fullStr |
Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences |
title_sort |
shared decision making in an integrated mental health and vocational rehabilitation intervention: stakeholder practices and experiences |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
International Journal of Integrated Care |
issn |
1568-4156 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Introduction: A Danish integrated mental health care and vocational intervention was developed to support the return-to-work process for people with common mental disorders. Shared decision making was a core element of the intervention to ensure a person-centred approach. The study aim is to describe how shared decision making was practiced and experienced and to discuss its potential in this integrated care context. Theory and methods: Shared decision making practice and experience was studied in participant observation (n = 20), interviews (n = 12), focus groups interviews (n = 2), and shared plan documents (n = 12). Research methods and analyses were guided by theoretically defined ideals of shared decision making. Results: Shared decision making constituted a general value rather than a structured method in practice. Clients experienced a more person-centred collaboration with professionals, compared to the regular vocational system. Contextual factors regarding vocational legislation and the intervention design influenced the decision latitude. Conclusion: Shared decision making has the potential to support a person-centred approach in integrated services. However, we recommend clarifying decisions applicable for shared decision making, to ensure thorough training, develop and test decision aids, and ensure supportive organisational conditions for shared decision making in interprofessional collaboration. |
topic |
shared decision making integrated care mental health care vocational rehabilitation common mental disorders |
url |
https://www.ijic.org/articles/5509 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kathrinehoffmannpii shareddecisionmakinginanintegratedmentalhealthandvocationalrehabilitationinterventionstakeholderpracticesandexperiences AT lisbethhybholt shareddecisionmakinginanintegratedmentalhealthandvocationalrehabilitationinterventionstakeholderpracticesandexperiences AT riemandruppoulsen shareddecisionmakinginanintegratedmentalhealthandvocationalrehabilitationinterventionstakeholderpracticesandexperiences AT lenefalgaardeplov shareddecisionmakinginanintegratedmentalhealthandvocationalrehabilitationinterventionstakeholderpracticesandexperiences AT mathiasmeijer shareddecisionmakinginanintegratedmentalhealthandvocationalrehabilitationinterventionstakeholderpracticesandexperiences |
_version_ |
1724387325925916672 |