Comparative analysis of “APTT vs RVVT” based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation

Background: Thrombophilia is a hypercoagulable state characterized by increased venous thrombosis. The most common cause of heritable thrombophilia is Factor V Leiden (FVR506Q) homozygous state, with a relative risk of 10–80 times as compared to normal individuals and Lupus anticoagulant is the most...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mirza Asif Baig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijpmonline.org/article.asp?issn=0377-4929;year=2020;volume=63;issue=2;spage=247;epage=250;aulast=Baig
id doaj-1643dc9913cf4257802c52eb088a56fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1643dc9913cf4257802c52eb088a56fa2020-11-25T02:56:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology0377-49292020-01-0163224725010.4103/IJPM.IJPM_899_19Comparative analysis of “APTT vs RVVT” based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutationMirza Asif BaigBackground: Thrombophilia is a hypercoagulable state characterized by increased venous thrombosis. The most common cause of heritable thrombophilia is Factor V Leiden (FVR506Q) homozygous state, with a relative risk of 10–80 times as compared to normal individuals and Lupus anticoagulant is the most common cause of acquired thrombophilia. The main objective of this study is to compare the sensitivity of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) vs dilute Russell viper venom test (DRVVT) based APCR assays with predilution in Factor V-deficient plasma for diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation. Materials And Methods: The coagulometer used for APCR test was Sysmex CS-5100. APTT reagent used is Pathrombin SL supplied by Siemens. All data were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired students t-test and a P value <0.05 was considered as statistical significance. Results: A total of 300 cases of APCR (200 cases of Factor V Leiden mutation was confirmed by PCR and 100 acquired) were studied. The sensitivity of screening APTT-based APCR for detection of Factor V Leiden mutation is 67% and for the noncarrier state, it is 62%. The sensitivity of modified APTT and DRVVT with predilution in FV-deficient plasma for detection of Factor V Leiden mutation is 82% and 84%, respectively and for acquired causes, it is 48% and 86%, respectivelyConclusion: Screening APTT test has increased in activated protein C resistance (APCR) due to Factor V Leiden mutation as well as acquired causes such as patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants, warfarin, lupus anticoagulants, and oral contraceptive pills which are independent risk factors of venous thrombosis. Modified DRVVT with predilution in FV-deficient plasma is more sensitive than screening and modified APTT-based APCR test in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation and the former test can distinguish homozygous and heterozygous states from normal individuals.http://www.ijpmonline.org/article.asp?issn=0377-4929;year=2020;volume=63;issue=2;spage=247;epage=250;aulast=Baigactivated protein c resistanceactivated partial thromboplastin timefactor v leiden mutationlupus anticoagulant
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mirza Asif Baig
spellingShingle Mirza Asif Baig
Comparative analysis of “APTT vs RVVT” based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
activated protein c resistance
activated partial thromboplastin time
factor v leiden mutation
lupus anticoagulant
author_facet Mirza Asif Baig
author_sort Mirza Asif Baig
title Comparative analysis of “APTT vs RVVT” based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation
title_short Comparative analysis of “APTT vs RVVT” based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation
title_full Comparative analysis of “APTT vs RVVT” based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of “APTT vs RVVT” based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of “APTT vs RVVT” based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation
title_sort comparative analysis of “aptt vs rvvt” based activated protein c resistance assay in the diagnosis of factor v leiden mutation
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
issn 0377-4929
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background: Thrombophilia is a hypercoagulable state characterized by increased venous thrombosis. The most common cause of heritable thrombophilia is Factor V Leiden (FVR506Q) homozygous state, with a relative risk of 10–80 times as compared to normal individuals and Lupus anticoagulant is the most common cause of acquired thrombophilia. The main objective of this study is to compare the sensitivity of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) vs dilute Russell viper venom test (DRVVT) based APCR assays with predilution in Factor V-deficient plasma for diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation. Materials And Methods: The coagulometer used for APCR test was Sysmex CS-5100. APTT reagent used is Pathrombin SL supplied by Siemens. All data were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired students t-test and a P value <0.05 was considered as statistical significance. Results: A total of 300 cases of APCR (200 cases of Factor V Leiden mutation was confirmed by PCR and 100 acquired) were studied. The sensitivity of screening APTT-based APCR for detection of Factor V Leiden mutation is 67% and for the noncarrier state, it is 62%. The sensitivity of modified APTT and DRVVT with predilution in FV-deficient plasma for detection of Factor V Leiden mutation is 82% and 84%, respectively and for acquired causes, it is 48% and 86%, respectivelyConclusion: Screening APTT test has increased in activated protein C resistance (APCR) due to Factor V Leiden mutation as well as acquired causes such as patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants, warfarin, lupus anticoagulants, and oral contraceptive pills which are independent risk factors of venous thrombosis. Modified DRVVT with predilution in FV-deficient plasma is more sensitive than screening and modified APTT-based APCR test in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation and the former test can distinguish homozygous and heterozygous states from normal individuals.
topic activated protein c resistance
activated partial thromboplastin time
factor v leiden mutation
lupus anticoagulant
url http://www.ijpmonline.org/article.asp?issn=0377-4929;year=2020;volume=63;issue=2;spage=247;epage=250;aulast=Baig
work_keys_str_mv AT mirzaasifbaig comparativeanalysisofapttvsrvvtbasedactivatedproteincresistanceassayinthediagnosisoffactorvleidenmutation
_version_ 1724712236175327232