Performance Comparison between Neutralization Tailings and Flotation Tailings Used for Backfill Mix and Mechanism Analysis
A comparison test of different tailings used for underground backfill was conducted, using neutralized tailings from BIOX and flotation tailings of Jinfeng Mine. Laboratory comparison test results show that, with neutralized tailings, when the cement dosage is at 19%, backfill UCS after 7 days, 14 d...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1087269 |
id |
doaj-16423468474547508ddbd9ccdbe68c7c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-16423468474547508ddbd9ccdbe68c7c2020-11-24T23:11:34ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84341687-84422016-01-01201610.1155/2016/10872691087269Performance Comparison between Neutralization Tailings and Flotation Tailings Used for Backfill Mix and Mechanism AnalysisBin Han0Wei Sun1Shaofeng Yu2Chao Liu3Song Yao4Jianxun Wu5School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, ChinaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaA comparison test of different tailings used for underground backfill was conducted, using neutralized tailings from BIOX and flotation tailings of Jinfeng Mine. Laboratory comparison test results show that, with neutralized tailings, when the cement dosage is at 19%, backfill UCS after 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days are 105%–163%, 80%–102%, and 33%–43%, respectively, which are higher than those of flotation tailings. When the cement dosage is at 12%, backfill UCS after 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days are 58%–77%, 50%–60%, and 28%–51%, respectively, which are higher than those of flotation tailings. Slurry fluidity of neutralized tailings is lower than that of flotation tailings, while, in these two tailings, the difference of slump and diffusivity values is less than 6%, which is not a significant difference in slurry fluidity. The reason for neutralized tailings showing higher UCS is as follows: during backfill curing, neutralization tailings produce abundant crystals of CaSO4·2H2O in interlaced structure which helps in combining aggregates closely; CaSO4·2H2O hydrates with C3A C4AF contained in the cement and forms clavate cement bacillus which works as a micro reinforcing steel bar. The test proved that neutralized tailings are more optimal for backfilling.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1087269 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bin Han Wei Sun Shaofeng Yu Chao Liu Song Yao Jianxun Wu |
spellingShingle |
Bin Han Wei Sun Shaofeng Yu Chao Liu Song Yao Jianxun Wu Performance Comparison between Neutralization Tailings and Flotation Tailings Used for Backfill Mix and Mechanism Analysis Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
author_facet |
Bin Han Wei Sun Shaofeng Yu Chao Liu Song Yao Jianxun Wu |
author_sort |
Bin Han |
title |
Performance Comparison between Neutralization Tailings and Flotation Tailings Used for Backfill Mix and Mechanism Analysis |
title_short |
Performance Comparison between Neutralization Tailings and Flotation Tailings Used for Backfill Mix and Mechanism Analysis |
title_full |
Performance Comparison between Neutralization Tailings and Flotation Tailings Used for Backfill Mix and Mechanism Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Performance Comparison between Neutralization Tailings and Flotation Tailings Used for Backfill Mix and Mechanism Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance Comparison between Neutralization Tailings and Flotation Tailings Used for Backfill Mix and Mechanism Analysis |
title_sort |
performance comparison between neutralization tailings and flotation tailings used for backfill mix and mechanism analysis |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
issn |
1687-8434 1687-8442 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
A comparison test of different tailings used for underground backfill was conducted, using neutralized tailings from BIOX and flotation tailings of Jinfeng Mine. Laboratory comparison test results show that, with neutralized tailings, when the cement dosage is at 19%, backfill UCS after 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days are 105%–163%, 80%–102%, and 33%–43%, respectively, which are higher than those of flotation tailings. When the cement dosage is at 12%, backfill UCS after 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days are 58%–77%, 50%–60%, and 28%–51%, respectively, which are higher than those of flotation tailings. Slurry fluidity of neutralized tailings is lower than that of flotation tailings, while, in these two tailings, the difference of slump and diffusivity values is less than 6%, which is not a significant difference in slurry fluidity. The reason for neutralized tailings showing higher UCS is as follows: during backfill curing, neutralization tailings produce abundant crystals of CaSO4·2H2O in interlaced structure which helps in combining aggregates closely; CaSO4·2H2O hydrates with C3A C4AF contained in the cement and forms clavate cement bacillus which works as a micro reinforcing steel bar. The test proved that neutralized tailings are more optimal for backfilling. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1087269 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT binhan performancecomparisonbetweenneutralizationtailingsandflotationtailingsusedforbackfillmixandmechanismanalysis AT weisun performancecomparisonbetweenneutralizationtailingsandflotationtailingsusedforbackfillmixandmechanismanalysis AT shaofengyu performancecomparisonbetweenneutralizationtailingsandflotationtailingsusedforbackfillmixandmechanismanalysis AT chaoliu performancecomparisonbetweenneutralizationtailingsandflotationtailingsusedforbackfillmixandmechanismanalysis AT songyao performancecomparisonbetweenneutralizationtailingsandflotationtailingsusedforbackfillmixandmechanismanalysis AT jianxunwu performancecomparisonbetweenneutralizationtailingsandflotationtailingsusedforbackfillmixandmechanismanalysis |
_version_ |
1725603803998191616 |