Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Studies

Aim. This systematic review is aimed at investigating the biomechanical stress that develops in the maxillofacial prostheses (MFP) and supporting structures and methods to optimize it. Design and Methods. A literature survey was conducted for full-text English articles which used FEA to examine the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed A. Mousa, Johari Yap Abdullah, Nafij B. Jamayet, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Adam Husein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6419774
id doaj-163c413e3e9f4e7d82f771a648552f1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-163c413e3e9f4e7d82f771a648552f1a2021-08-30T00:01:16ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61412021-01-01202110.1155/2021/6419774Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element StudiesMohammed A. Mousa0Johari Yap Abdullah1Nafij B. Jamayet2Mohammad Khursheed Alam3Adam Husein4Prosthodontic UnitCraniofacial Imaging LaboratoryDivision of Restorative DentistryDepartment of Preventive DentistryProsthodontic UnitAim. This systematic review is aimed at investigating the biomechanical stress that develops in the maxillofacial prostheses (MFP) and supporting structures and methods to optimize it. Design and Methods. A literature survey was conducted for full-text English articles which used FEA to examine the stress developed in conventional and implant-assisted MFPs from January 2010 to December 2020. Results. 87 articles were screened to get an update on the desired information. 74 were excluded based on a complete screening, and finally, 13 articles were recruited for complete reviewing. Discussion. The MFP is subjected to stress, which is reflected in the form of compressive and tensile strengths. The stress is mainly concentrated the resection line and around the apices of roots of teeth next to the defect. Diversity of designs and techniques were introduced to optimize the stress distribution, such as modification of the clasp design, using materials with different mechanical properties for dentures base and retainer, use of dental (DI) and/or zygomatic implants (ZI), and free flap reconstruction before prosthetic rehabilitation. Conclusion. Using ZI in the defective side of the dentulous maxillary defect and defective and nondefective side of the edentulous maxillary defect was found more advantageous, in terms of compression and tensile stress and retention, when compared with DI and free flap reconstruction.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6419774
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammed A. Mousa
Johari Yap Abdullah
Nafij B. Jamayet
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Adam Husein
spellingShingle Mohammed A. Mousa
Johari Yap Abdullah
Nafij B. Jamayet
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Adam Husein
Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Studies
BioMed Research International
author_facet Mohammed A. Mousa
Johari Yap Abdullah
Nafij B. Jamayet
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Adam Husein
author_sort Mohammed A. Mousa
title Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Studies
title_short Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Studies
title_full Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Studies
title_fullStr Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Studies
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Studies
title_sort biomechanical stress in obturator prostheses: a systematic review of finite element studies
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6141
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Aim. This systematic review is aimed at investigating the biomechanical stress that develops in the maxillofacial prostheses (MFP) and supporting structures and methods to optimize it. Design and Methods. A literature survey was conducted for full-text English articles which used FEA to examine the stress developed in conventional and implant-assisted MFPs from January 2010 to December 2020. Results. 87 articles were screened to get an update on the desired information. 74 were excluded based on a complete screening, and finally, 13 articles were recruited for complete reviewing. Discussion. The MFP is subjected to stress, which is reflected in the form of compressive and tensile strengths. The stress is mainly concentrated the resection line and around the apices of roots of teeth next to the defect. Diversity of designs and techniques were introduced to optimize the stress distribution, such as modification of the clasp design, using materials with different mechanical properties for dentures base and retainer, use of dental (DI) and/or zygomatic implants (ZI), and free flap reconstruction before prosthetic rehabilitation. Conclusion. Using ZI in the defective side of the dentulous maxillary defect and defective and nondefective side of the edentulous maxillary defect was found more advantageous, in terms of compression and tensile stress and retention, when compared with DI and free flap reconstruction.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6419774
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedamousa biomechanicalstressinobturatorprosthesesasystematicreviewoffiniteelementstudies
AT johariyapabdullah biomechanicalstressinobturatorprosthesesasystematicreviewoffiniteelementstudies
AT nafijbjamayet biomechanicalstressinobturatorprosthesesasystematicreviewoffiniteelementstudies
AT mohammadkhursheedalam biomechanicalstressinobturatorprosthesesasystematicreviewoffiniteelementstudies
AT adamhusein biomechanicalstressinobturatorprosthesesasystematicreviewoffiniteelementstudies
_version_ 1721186061496877056