Cross-limb interference during motor learning.

It is well known that following skill learning, improvements in motor performance may transfer to the untrained contralateral limb. It is also well known that retention of a newly learned task A can be degraded when learning a competing task B that takes place directly after learning A. Here we inve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benedikt Lauber, Jesper Lundbye-Jensen, Martin Keller, Albert Gollhofer, Wolfgang Taube, Christian Leukel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3849090?pdf=render
id doaj-1622d40010d54fc69635b7ac4cb2f7ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1622d40010d54fc69635b7ac4cb2f7ec2020-11-25T02:22:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8103810.1371/journal.pone.0081038Cross-limb interference during motor learning.Benedikt LauberJesper Lundbye-JensenMartin KellerAlbert GollhoferWolfgang TaubeChristian LeukelIt is well known that following skill learning, improvements in motor performance may transfer to the untrained contralateral limb. It is also well known that retention of a newly learned task A can be degraded when learning a competing task B that takes place directly after learning A. Here we investigate if this interference effect can also be observed in the limb contralateral to the trained one. Therefore, five different groups practiced a ballistic finger flexion task followed by an interfering visuomotor accuracy task with the same limb. Performance in the ballistic task was tested before the training, after the training and in an immediate retention test after the practice of the interference task for both the trained and the untrained hand. After training, subjects showed not only significant learning and interference effects for the trained limb but also for the contralateral untrained limb. Importantly, the interference effect in the untrained limb was dependent on the level of skill acquisition in the interfering motor task. These behavioural results of the untrained limb were accompanied by training specific changes in corticospinal excitability, which increased for the hemisphere ipsilateral to the trained hand following ballistic training and decreased during accuracy training of the ipsilateral hand. The results demonstrate that contralateral interference effects may occur, and that interference depends on the level of skill acquisition in the interfering motor task. This finding might be particularly relevant for rehabilitation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3849090?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benedikt Lauber
Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
Martin Keller
Albert Gollhofer
Wolfgang Taube
Christian Leukel
spellingShingle Benedikt Lauber
Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
Martin Keller
Albert Gollhofer
Wolfgang Taube
Christian Leukel
Cross-limb interference during motor learning.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Benedikt Lauber
Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
Martin Keller
Albert Gollhofer
Wolfgang Taube
Christian Leukel
author_sort Benedikt Lauber
title Cross-limb interference during motor learning.
title_short Cross-limb interference during motor learning.
title_full Cross-limb interference during motor learning.
title_fullStr Cross-limb interference during motor learning.
title_full_unstemmed Cross-limb interference during motor learning.
title_sort cross-limb interference during motor learning.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description It is well known that following skill learning, improvements in motor performance may transfer to the untrained contralateral limb. It is also well known that retention of a newly learned task A can be degraded when learning a competing task B that takes place directly after learning A. Here we investigate if this interference effect can also be observed in the limb contralateral to the trained one. Therefore, five different groups practiced a ballistic finger flexion task followed by an interfering visuomotor accuracy task with the same limb. Performance in the ballistic task was tested before the training, after the training and in an immediate retention test after the practice of the interference task for both the trained and the untrained hand. After training, subjects showed not only significant learning and interference effects for the trained limb but also for the contralateral untrained limb. Importantly, the interference effect in the untrained limb was dependent on the level of skill acquisition in the interfering motor task. These behavioural results of the untrained limb were accompanied by training specific changes in corticospinal excitability, which increased for the hemisphere ipsilateral to the trained hand following ballistic training and decreased during accuracy training of the ipsilateral hand. The results demonstrate that contralateral interference effects may occur, and that interference depends on the level of skill acquisition in the interfering motor task. This finding might be particularly relevant for rehabilitation.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3849090?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT benediktlauber crosslimbinterferenceduringmotorlearning
AT jesperlundbyejensen crosslimbinterferenceduringmotorlearning
AT martinkeller crosslimbinterferenceduringmotorlearning
AT albertgollhofer crosslimbinterferenceduringmotorlearning
AT wolfgangtaube crosslimbinterferenceduringmotorlearning
AT christianleukel crosslimbinterferenceduringmotorlearning
_version_ 1724862312316141568