Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the corticosteroids for uveal effusion syndrome (UES). Methods: Retrospective series of 104 eyes with UES treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS), periocular corticosteroids (PCS), topical corticosteroids (TCS), or observation (OBS). Main outcome...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carol L Shields, Kelsey Roelofs, Maura Di Nicola, Kareem Sioufi, Arman Mashayekhi, Jerry A Shields
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2017;volume=65;issue=11;spage=1093;epage=1104;aulast=Shields
id doaj-1619fac0aa6d41d3be5ac175796dd0cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1619fac0aa6d41d3be5ac175796dd0cc2020-11-24T23:46:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892017-01-0165111093110410.4103/ijo.IJO_752_17Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lectureCarol L ShieldsKelsey RoelofsMaura Di NicolaKareem SioufiArman MashayekhiJerry A ShieldsPurpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the corticosteroids for uveal effusion syndrome (UES). Methods: Retrospective series of 104 eyes with UES treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS), periocular corticosteroids (PCS), topical corticosteroids (TCS), or observation (OBS). Main outcome measure was UES resolution. Results: Of 104 eyes, treatment included OCS (n = 27), PCS (n = 12), TCS (n = 11), and OBS (n = 54). A comparison of the four groups (OCS vs. PCS vs. TCS vs. OBS) revealed differences in those managed with OCS versus OBS as younger (66 vs. 72 years, P = 0.049), PCS versus OBS as male (100% vs. 54%, P = 0.002), PCS versus OBS with decreased visual acuity (VA)/visual field (91% vs. 51%, P = 0.018), and OBS versus OCS as asymptomatic (28% vs. 0%, P = 0.001). Of the 59 with follow-up information, management included OCS (n = 21), PCS (n = 12), TCS (n = 6), and OBS (n = 20). There were differences in initial VA <20/400 in PCS versus OBS (42% vs. 5%, P = 0.018), effusion thickness in TCS versus OCS (7 vs. 3 mm, P = 0.004), and serous retinal detachment in PCS versus OBS (100% vs. 30%, P < 0.001) and PCS versus OCS (100% vs. 57%, P = 0.012). Regarding outcomes, VA showed less worsening in OCS versus OBS (0% vs. 30%, P = 0.008) and OCS versus PCS (0% vs. 33%, P = 0.012). There was no difference in rate of effusion resolution or effusion recurrence. Overall, using combination of corticosteroid therapies, effusion resolution was achieved in 56/59 (95%) cases and the need for surgical management with scleral windows was necessary in only 3/59 (5%) cases. Complications included cataract (n = 9) and no instance of steroid-induced glaucoma. Conclusion: Management of UES is complex and depends on disease severity. Using various corticosteroid delivery routes, UES control was achieved in 95%, and scleral window surgery was required in only 5%. A trial of corticosteroids can benefit patients with UES.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2017;volume=65;issue=11;spage=1093;epage=1104;aulast=ShieldsChoroidcorticosteroidsdetachmenteffusionmelanomapseudomelanomauveauveal effusion syndrome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carol L Shields
Kelsey Roelofs
Maura Di Nicola
Kareem Sioufi
Arman Mashayekhi
Jerry A Shields
spellingShingle Carol L Shields
Kelsey Roelofs
Maura Di Nicola
Kareem Sioufi
Arman Mashayekhi
Jerry A Shields
Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Choroid
corticosteroids
detachment
effusion
melanoma
pseudomelanoma
uvea
uveal effusion syndrome
author_facet Carol L Shields
Kelsey Roelofs
Maura Di Nicola
Kareem Sioufi
Arman Mashayekhi
Jerry A Shields
author_sort Carol L Shields
title Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_short Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_full Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_fullStr Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_full_unstemmed Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_sort uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: response to corticosteroids – the 2017 axel c. hansen lecture
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the corticosteroids for uveal effusion syndrome (UES). Methods: Retrospective series of 104 eyes with UES treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS), periocular corticosteroids (PCS), topical corticosteroids (TCS), or observation (OBS). Main outcome measure was UES resolution. Results: Of 104 eyes, treatment included OCS (n = 27), PCS (n = 12), TCS (n = 11), and OBS (n = 54). A comparison of the four groups (OCS vs. PCS vs. TCS vs. OBS) revealed differences in those managed with OCS versus OBS as younger (66 vs. 72 years, P = 0.049), PCS versus OBS as male (100% vs. 54%, P = 0.002), PCS versus OBS with decreased visual acuity (VA)/visual field (91% vs. 51%, P = 0.018), and OBS versus OCS as asymptomatic (28% vs. 0%, P = 0.001). Of the 59 with follow-up information, management included OCS (n = 21), PCS (n = 12), TCS (n = 6), and OBS (n = 20). There were differences in initial VA <20/400 in PCS versus OBS (42% vs. 5%, P = 0.018), effusion thickness in TCS versus OCS (7 vs. 3 mm, P = 0.004), and serous retinal detachment in PCS versus OBS (100% vs. 30%, P < 0.001) and PCS versus OCS (100% vs. 57%, P = 0.012). Regarding outcomes, VA showed less worsening in OCS versus OBS (0% vs. 30%, P = 0.008) and OCS versus PCS (0% vs. 33%, P = 0.012). There was no difference in rate of effusion resolution or effusion recurrence. Overall, using combination of corticosteroid therapies, effusion resolution was achieved in 56/59 (95%) cases and the need for surgical management with scleral windows was necessary in only 3/59 (5%) cases. Complications included cataract (n = 9) and no instance of steroid-induced glaucoma. Conclusion: Management of UES is complex and depends on disease severity. Using various corticosteroid delivery routes, UES control was achieved in 95%, and scleral window surgery was required in only 5%. A trial of corticosteroids can benefit patients with UES.
topic Choroid
corticosteroids
detachment
effusion
melanoma
pseudomelanoma
uvea
uveal effusion syndrome
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2017;volume=65;issue=11;spage=1093;epage=1104;aulast=Shields
work_keys_str_mv AT carollshields uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT kelseyroelofs uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT mauradinicola uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT kareemsioufi uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT armanmashayekhi uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT jerryashields uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
_version_ 1725492948371505152