The influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic Stem cell Transplantation (HSCT) can negatively impact the psychosocial well-being of the patient. Social support is a complex term that has been variably used to encompass perceived and objective support, including caregiver presence. Social support has been associated wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Beattie, Sophie Lebel, Jason Tay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3630123?pdf=render
id doaj-160b2776f62b45e39cb74cabe0fe55e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-160b2776f62b45e39cb74cabe0fe55e02020-11-25T02:33:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0184e6158610.1371/journal.pone.0061586The influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.Sara BeattieSophie LebelJason TayBACKGROUND: Hematopoietic Stem cell Transplantation (HSCT) can negatively impact the psychosocial well-being of the patient. Social support is a complex term that has been variably used to encompass perceived and objective support, including caregiver presence. Social support has been associated with superior psychosocial outcomes; however the influence of social support on HSCT survival remains unclear. We sought to summarize the literature on the influence of social support on HSCT survival. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, CINAHL, AND PSYCINFO WERE SEARCHED USING THE FOLLOWING SEARCH CATEGORIES/CONCEPTS: 1) HSCT, 2) Social support, 3) Caregiver, 4) Survival, and 5) Treatment outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 6 relevant studies: 4 publications, 1 dissertation, and 1 abstract. Three studies were retrospective and 3, prospective. Sample size ranged between 92-272 with a mean/median patient age between 30-55 yrs. The duration of follow-up ranged between 13.3-48 months. Social support was measured inconsistently: 2 by retrospective investigator assessment, 2 as patients' perceived support, 1 as caregiver presence, and 1 included caregiver presence and retrospective investigator assessment. The 4 published studies and 1 abstract demonstrate an association between better social support and survival. However, the unpublished dissertation, with the largest sample size found no association. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of evidence examining social support with HSCT survival. Available studies are older, with the most recent publication in 2005. A heterogeneous group of HSCT patients were studied with variable follow-up times. Further, covariates were variably considered in HSCT survival analyses and we suggest that there may be publication bias, given the negative unpublished study with the largest sample size. Prospective studies using validated scales are necessary to better assess the influence of social support on HSCT mortality. Given the potential for improved HSCT survival with better social support, HSCT centres should routinely provide HSCT recipients and their caregivers with enhanced psychosocial services.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3630123?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sara Beattie
Sophie Lebel
Jason Tay
spellingShingle Sara Beattie
Sophie Lebel
Jason Tay
The influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sara Beattie
Sophie Lebel
Jason Tay
author_sort Sara Beattie
title The influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.
title_short The influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.
title_full The influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.
title_fullStr The influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.
title_full_unstemmed The influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.
title_sort influence of social support on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survival: a systematic review of literature.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic Stem cell Transplantation (HSCT) can negatively impact the psychosocial well-being of the patient. Social support is a complex term that has been variably used to encompass perceived and objective support, including caregiver presence. Social support has been associated with superior psychosocial outcomes; however the influence of social support on HSCT survival remains unclear. We sought to summarize the literature on the influence of social support on HSCT survival. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, CINAHL, AND PSYCINFO WERE SEARCHED USING THE FOLLOWING SEARCH CATEGORIES/CONCEPTS: 1) HSCT, 2) Social support, 3) Caregiver, 4) Survival, and 5) Treatment outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 6 relevant studies: 4 publications, 1 dissertation, and 1 abstract. Three studies were retrospective and 3, prospective. Sample size ranged between 92-272 with a mean/median patient age between 30-55 yrs. The duration of follow-up ranged between 13.3-48 months. Social support was measured inconsistently: 2 by retrospective investigator assessment, 2 as patients' perceived support, 1 as caregiver presence, and 1 included caregiver presence and retrospective investigator assessment. The 4 published studies and 1 abstract demonstrate an association between better social support and survival. However, the unpublished dissertation, with the largest sample size found no association. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of evidence examining social support with HSCT survival. Available studies are older, with the most recent publication in 2005. A heterogeneous group of HSCT patients were studied with variable follow-up times. Further, covariates were variably considered in HSCT survival analyses and we suggest that there may be publication bias, given the negative unpublished study with the largest sample size. Prospective studies using validated scales are necessary to better assess the influence of social support on HSCT mortality. Given the potential for improved HSCT survival with better social support, HSCT centres should routinely provide HSCT recipients and their caregivers with enhanced psychosocial services.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3630123?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sarabeattie theinfluenceofsocialsupportonhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationsurvivalasystematicreviewofliterature
AT sophielebel theinfluenceofsocialsupportonhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationsurvivalasystematicreviewofliterature
AT jasontay theinfluenceofsocialsupportonhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationsurvivalasystematicreviewofliterature
AT sarabeattie influenceofsocialsupportonhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationsurvivalasystematicreviewofliterature
AT sophielebel influenceofsocialsupportonhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationsurvivalasystematicreviewofliterature
AT jasontay influenceofsocialsupportonhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationsurvivalasystematicreviewofliterature
_version_ 1724813527505436672