Circles of Consensus: The Preservation of Cultural Diversity through Political Processes

Western modern culture has expanded at the universal level and has thereby become a threat to other cultures, particularly those of chthonic communities. But these cultures have progressively recognized its worth as a source of richness, which can be very useful in facing future challenges to humani...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jordi Jaria i Manzano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2012-01-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.182/
id doaj-160951aebdb248d591f24d73c0e35bc9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-160951aebdb248d591f24d73c0e35bc92020-11-25T03:53:47ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2012-01-01819210510.18352/ulr.182177Circles of Consensus: The Preservation of Cultural Diversity through Political ProcessesJordi Jaria i Manzano0Universitat Rovira i Virgili, TarragonaWestern modern culture has expanded at the universal level and has thereby become a threat to other cultures, particularly those of chthonic communities. But these cultures have progressively recognized its worth as a source of richness, which can be very useful in facing future challenges to humanity. Moreover, in terms of human dignity and the equality of all human beings, Western modern culture has to be recognized as having an intrinsic value as well. Given these facts, we must find a way to protect this cultural diversity in an effective manner. It is obvious that assimilationist or isolationist models are not satisfactory. So I propose a third way. I call it an integrationist or a deep approach. It consists of giving political density to cultural diversity through the design of federalist strategies that have, as a result, the definition of different levels of decision (circles of consensus). After having exposed my model, I will pay attention to the recent constitutional experiences in Ecuador and Bolivia, where some new developments in this sense are intended. I compare these models with my proposal and, finally, I analyze the main problems that a deep approach to preserving cultural diversity has to face up to.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.182/cultural diversityfederalismdemocracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jordi Jaria i Manzano
spellingShingle Jordi Jaria i Manzano
Circles of Consensus: The Preservation of Cultural Diversity through Political Processes
Utrecht Law Review
cultural diversity
federalism
democracy
author_facet Jordi Jaria i Manzano
author_sort Jordi Jaria i Manzano
title Circles of Consensus: The Preservation of Cultural Diversity through Political Processes
title_short Circles of Consensus: The Preservation of Cultural Diversity through Political Processes
title_full Circles of Consensus: The Preservation of Cultural Diversity through Political Processes
title_fullStr Circles of Consensus: The Preservation of Cultural Diversity through Political Processes
title_full_unstemmed Circles of Consensus: The Preservation of Cultural Diversity through Political Processes
title_sort circles of consensus: the preservation of cultural diversity through political processes
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Western modern culture has expanded at the universal level and has thereby become a threat to other cultures, particularly those of chthonic communities. But these cultures have progressively recognized its worth as a source of richness, which can be very useful in facing future challenges to humanity. Moreover, in terms of human dignity and the equality of all human beings, Western modern culture has to be recognized as having an intrinsic value as well. Given these facts, we must find a way to protect this cultural diversity in an effective manner. It is obvious that assimilationist or isolationist models are not satisfactory. So I propose a third way. I call it an integrationist or a deep approach. It consists of giving political density to cultural diversity through the design of federalist strategies that have, as a result, the definition of different levels of decision (circles of consensus). After having exposed my model, I will pay attention to the recent constitutional experiences in Ecuador and Bolivia, where some new developments in this sense are intended. I compare these models with my proposal and, finally, I analyze the main problems that a deep approach to preserving cultural diversity has to face up to.
topic cultural diversity
federalism
democracy
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.182/
work_keys_str_mv AT jordijariaimanzano circlesofconsensusthepreservationofculturaldiversitythroughpoliticalprocesses
_version_ 1724476625502863360