Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study

Background: Previous work has demonstrated that the recording of acute health outcomes, such as myocardial infarction (MI), may be suboptimal in primary healthcare databases. Aim: To assess the completeness and accuracy of the recording of stroke in UK primary care. Design & setting: A populatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ann Morgan, Sarah-Jo Sinnott, Liam Smeeth, Caroline Minassian, Jennifer Quint
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-04-01
Series:BJGP Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjgpopen.org/content/5/2/BJGPO.2020.0117
id doaj-15f09d4ad4964ebf991b631976108d3c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15f09d4ad4964ebf991b631976108d3c2021-04-27T18:16:59ZengRoyal College of General PractitionersBJGP Open2398-37952021-04-015210.3399/BJGPO.2020.0117Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort studyAnn Morgan0Sarah-Jo Sinnott1Liam Smeeth2Caroline Minassian3Jennifer Quint4Department of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UKFaculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UKFaculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UKFaculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UKDepartment of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UKBackground: Previous work has demonstrated that the recording of acute health outcomes, such as myocardial infarction (MI), may be suboptimal in primary healthcare databases. Aim: To assess the completeness and accuracy of the recording of stroke in UK primary care. Design & setting: A population-based longitudinal cohort study. Method: Cases of stroke were identified separately in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) primary care records and linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). The recording of events in the same patient across the two datasets was compared. The reliability of strategies to identify fatal strokes in primary care and hospital records was also assessed. Results: Of the 75 674 stroke events that were identified in either CPRD or HES data during the period of the study, 54 929 (72.6%) were recorded in CPRD and 51 013 (67.4%) were recorded in HES. Two-fifths (n = 30 268) of all recorded strokes were found in both datasets (allowing for a time window of 120 days). Among these 'matched' strokes the subtype was recorded accurately in approximately 75% of CPRD records (compared with coding in HES); however, 43.5% of ischaemic strokes in HES were coded as 'non-specific' strokes in CPRD data. Furthermore, 48.2% had same-day recordings, and 56.2% were date-matched within ±1 day. Conclusion: The completeness and accuracy of stroke recording is improved by the use of linked hospital and primary care records. For studies that have a time-sensitive research question, the use of linked, as opposed to stand-alone, CPRD data is strongly recommended.https://bjgpopen.org/content/5/2/BJGPO.2020.0117primary health careelectronic health recordsclinical practice research datalinkstroke
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ann Morgan
Sarah-Jo Sinnott
Liam Smeeth
Caroline Minassian
Jennifer Quint
spellingShingle Ann Morgan
Sarah-Jo Sinnott
Liam Smeeth
Caroline Minassian
Jennifer Quint
Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study
BJGP Open
primary health care
electronic health records
clinical practice research datalink
stroke
author_facet Ann Morgan
Sarah-Jo Sinnott
Liam Smeeth
Caroline Minassian
Jennifer Quint
author_sort Ann Morgan
title Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study
title_short Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study
title_full Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study
title_fullStr Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Concordance in the recording of stroke across UK primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study
title_sort concordance in the recording of stroke across uk primary and secondary care datasets: a population-based cohort study
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
series BJGP Open
issn 2398-3795
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Background: Previous work has demonstrated that the recording of acute health outcomes, such as myocardial infarction (MI), may be suboptimal in primary healthcare databases. Aim: To assess the completeness and accuracy of the recording of stroke in UK primary care. Design & setting: A population-based longitudinal cohort study. Method: Cases of stroke were identified separately in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) primary care records and linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). The recording of events in the same patient across the two datasets was compared. The reliability of strategies to identify fatal strokes in primary care and hospital records was also assessed. Results: Of the 75 674 stroke events that were identified in either CPRD or HES data during the period of the study, 54 929 (72.6%) were recorded in CPRD and 51 013 (67.4%) were recorded in HES. Two-fifths (n = 30 268) of all recorded strokes were found in both datasets (allowing for a time window of 120 days). Among these 'matched' strokes the subtype was recorded accurately in approximately 75% of CPRD records (compared with coding in HES); however, 43.5% of ischaemic strokes in HES were coded as 'non-specific' strokes in CPRD data. Furthermore, 48.2% had same-day recordings, and 56.2% were date-matched within ±1 day. Conclusion: The completeness and accuracy of stroke recording is improved by the use of linked hospital and primary care records. For studies that have a time-sensitive research question, the use of linked, as opposed to stand-alone, CPRD data is strongly recommended.
topic primary health care
electronic health records
clinical practice research datalink
stroke
url https://bjgpopen.org/content/5/2/BJGPO.2020.0117
work_keys_str_mv AT annmorgan concordanceintherecordingofstrokeacrossukprimaryandsecondarycaredatasetsapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT sarahjosinnott concordanceintherecordingofstrokeacrossukprimaryandsecondarycaredatasetsapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT liamsmeeth concordanceintherecordingofstrokeacrossukprimaryandsecondarycaredatasetsapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT carolineminassian concordanceintherecordingofstrokeacrossukprimaryandsecondarycaredatasetsapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT jenniferquint concordanceintherecordingofstrokeacrossukprimaryandsecondarycaredatasetsapopulationbasedcohortstudy
_version_ 1721505624702844928