Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature

This article in the descriptive style introduces with adaptation of hermeneutics of reception to Latin poetry in Charles Martindale’s book “Redeeming the text: Latin poetry and the hermeneutics of reception”. The following five ideas of Martindale’s reception theory are 1) a contingent and continuou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jovita Dikmonienė
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University 2007-01-01
Series:Literatūra (Vilnius)
Online Access:http://www.literatura.flf.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Lit_49_3_8-21.pdf
id doaj-15ef703352de46379c9dc97e8ee6c989
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15ef703352de46379c9dc97e8ee6c9892020-11-25T00:31:03ZdeuVilnius University Literatūra (Vilnius)0258-08021648-11432007-01-01493821Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literatureJovita DikmonienėThis article in the descriptive style introduces with adaptation of hermeneutics of reception to Latin poetry in Charles Martindale’s book “Redeeming the text: Latin poetry and the hermeneutics of reception”. The following five ideas of Martindale’s reception theory are 1) a contingent and continuously supplemented understanding of the meaning of the text being read, 2) continuously (re)interpreted contexts, 3) history as intersubjective stories about the past, 4) doubting the radical canon criticism, and 5) a dialogue with classical texts.Martindale argues that the text does not have any fixed meaning given by the author. On this stance, he does not agree with Jauss and Gadamer. Martindale compares interpretation of a literary work to performance of a piece of music: each new reading of the same text becomes a new concretization” and differs from any other manner of reading.Martindale notes that when studying ancient literature we cannot approach the pure, non-interpreted facts. Different people interpret one and the same fact differently, depending on their values, experience, and interests.Martindale does not agree with Fish’s theory of interpretative communities, arguing that only the critic himself hides behind the “implied reader” construction. He agrees with theories of dialogue of Bakhtin and Gadamer, with Derridean deconstruction. Martindale suggests understanding reading as an acquaintance and dialogue with the author of the text, which is influenced by the différance. Such a dialogue actualises the ancient literary work and enables passing it on to future generations.http://www.literatura.flf.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Lit_49_3_8-21.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jovita Dikmonienė
spellingShingle Jovita Dikmonienė
Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature
Literatūra (Vilnius)
author_facet Jovita Dikmonienė
author_sort Jovita Dikmonienė
title Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature
title_short Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature
title_full Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature
title_fullStr Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature
title_full_unstemmed Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature
title_sort charleso martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra | charles martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature
publisher Vilnius University
series Literatūra (Vilnius)
issn 0258-0802
1648-1143
publishDate 2007-01-01
description This article in the descriptive style introduces with adaptation of hermeneutics of reception to Latin poetry in Charles Martindale’s book “Redeeming the text: Latin poetry and the hermeneutics of reception”. The following five ideas of Martindale’s reception theory are 1) a contingent and continuously supplemented understanding of the meaning of the text being read, 2) continuously (re)interpreted contexts, 3) history as intersubjective stories about the past, 4) doubting the radical canon criticism, and 5) a dialogue with classical texts.Martindale argues that the text does not have any fixed meaning given by the author. On this stance, he does not agree with Jauss and Gadamer. Martindale compares interpretation of a literary work to performance of a piece of music: each new reading of the same text becomes a new concretization” and differs from any other manner of reading.Martindale notes that when studying ancient literature we cannot approach the pure, non-interpreted facts. Different people interpret one and the same fact differently, depending on their values, experience, and interests.Martindale does not agree with Fish’s theory of interpretative communities, arguing that only the critic himself hides behind the “implied reader” construction. He agrees with theories of dialogue of Bakhtin and Gadamer, with Derridean deconstruction. Martindale suggests understanding reading as an acquaintance and dialogue with the author of the text, which is influenced by the différance. Such a dialogue actualises the ancient literary work and enables passing it on to future generations.
url http://www.literatura.flf.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Lit_49_3_8-21.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jovitadikmoniene charlesomartindaleiorecepcijosteorijairantikineliteraturacharlesmartindalesreceptiontheoryandancientliterature
_version_ 1725324049080385536